apophys Posted July 19, 2008 Report Posted July 19, 2008 I think it would be better to require about 200 BATTLES rather than 100 WINS. Btw, it would promote a balanced profile by punishing people who farm losses, as they wouldn't be able to upgrade their creatures as much.
Calyx of Isis Posted July 20, 2008 Report Posted July 20, 2008 I think it would be better to require about 200 BATTLES rather than 100 WINS. I have had this very thought, myself. Or even better, suppose the requirement were a minimum of 200 battles with a win/loss ratio between 35% and 65%. Or even 40% to 60%. But yes, when the issue is balanced evolution, a requirement for 100 wins is approximately a requirement for 200 combats.
Recommended Posts