Root Admin Muratus del Mur Posted April 15, 2007 Root Admin Report Posted April 15, 2007 The principle of balance does not reffer only to good and evil. It generaly stands for all things opposite and applies both to individual situations and other inferior Principles. Balance can NOT be broken, but it can be bent to one side or another, thus modifying the entire nature of the situation or the objects involved. For example, water puts out fire and fire evaporates water; this balance is never broken, but it can be altered, by giving more influence to one of the sides. The balance should be fully understood in order for one to be aware one is controlling it. Each situation, object or action is formed by parts, that have opposites. Most things are not pure by birth, thus they don't have a well shaped opposite. But the criteriae, the things are built upon, do have well known opposites. The first step consists of understanding the criteriae in order to find their opposites. It is difficult to use the Balance in one's favour, and it usually it becomes an art of chance and presumption. The most helpful thing that could be obtained through understanding the opposite is to fully understand the initial criteria. An opposite reveals a lot about the original's nature and ways of how to protect or destroy it.
Morrighan Posted October 10, 2007 Report Posted October 10, 2007 I CHOSE THAT! I just had a feeling that it was a vital principle....I could be wrong....
Tissy Posted December 21, 2007 Report Posted December 21, 2007 I think balance would be crucial when you encounter a oppo much stronger than you. Or I may put it like this:when weak versus strong,light versus darkness,syntropy versus enthropy,and maybe time versus cyclicity(like line versus circle),between two things opposite to each other,balance plays as a key factor. Sorry for my poor English and I'll be grateful when someone can rectify my thought as well as my English expression.
Root Admin Muratus del Mur Posted January 7, 2008 Author Root Admin Report Posted January 7, 2008 yes you have a good point there
Lan Manderagoran Posted February 8, 2008 Report Posted February 8, 2008 I chose balance, Darkness and Enthropy. do you think those would be a good combo? It seems like balance might compliment enthropy while darkness undeshadowed both, does that sound right?
Dalorian Posted July 15, 2008 Report Posted July 15, 2008 Ive chosen Enthropy, sythropy, Light, balance and time.. Im pretty sure I have a Powerful combination here...
Faraday Posted July 15, 2008 Report Posted July 15, 2008 Ive chosen Enthropy, sythropy, Light, balance and time.. Im pretty sure I have a Powerful combination here... Nice choices....i chose cyclicity, element, balance, syntropy and transposition. I didn't chose light or dark as i was not ready to choose which one i wanted lol I sort of wanted to be neutral. And i really have no idea wot my choices mean, as i find the explainations too complex for me lol But i really like it when individuals give their understanding, as it helps me to understand. So feel free to analyse my choices lol
Paradigma Posted July 16, 2008 Report Posted July 16, 2008 I chose Balance, light and darkness, + syntropy and entropy B) The balance main power!
axomas Posted July 18, 2008 Report Posted July 18, 2008 I chose principle of darkness, principle of light and balance as well. When I was choosing I was thinking something of the balance between good and bad, day and night, light and dark, something similar to "yin" and "yang" And I chose imagination to make all this more "alive, illusionary, imaginable, practicable" (didnt find the word, lol)
Sol Posted July 19, 2008 Report Posted July 19, 2008 @axomas I believe it that way too... The Ying and Yang symbol means that both sides are opposites but also compliments each other, when one side decreases the other side increases.
Recommended Posts