True / False: 9. Would you deplete a location and why ?

[No one]

9. Would you deplete a location and why ?

If yes, then why ?
if not, then why not ?

This is part of larger investigation in "[url="http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/topic/13853-resources-thoughts-and-questions/"]Resources. Thoughts and questions[/url]"

_________________________________________
Please keep the answers simple and free of spam.
Please vote then please detail your answer.
Please do not delete / edit out your comment.

[Chewett]

no - because its stupid from a "collect as many X as possible " pov and greedy

[Burns]

I don't as long as the supplies are there. If i want something and know that the chance is slim for it (or me) to be there the next day, because somebody else would deplete or the location is hard to get to, i'd take it.

[nadrolski]

No.

Either i collect un-harvested harvest-able resources until safety level, or i'll pass for today and give chance to others.

[Udgard]

Normally no - I prefer to leave resources at optimum regen value (2/3).

But if the location is being purposely depleted by someone else, I might deplete it myself rather than wait only for others to deplete it.

[Shemhazaj]

[color=#808080][i]Normally no.[/i][/color]
[color=#808080][i]But I can think of some extreme "what if" scenarios that would make me reconsider.[/i][/color]
[color=#808080][i]That's why my vote is "yes and no"[/i][/color]

[Eagle Eye]

[color=#ff8c00]No, Because i don't too[/color]

[Seeker]

No, it's not as productive when collecting o.o

[DarkRaptor]

No. I would prefer that max regeneration of the resources are maintained.

[Nimrodel]

Nope. I rather prefer training than running around gathering stuff.