So, what happens now? Do we try to find an answer to these questions by talking about them?

murry will organize public debates, thats how i got it

Alright, awesome!

Sorry for dp. But props to Mur for his reply to DST's question.

ME?

i was hoping i caused enough "movement" in the realm in the last few days to keep you moving for a while.

What stops you from organising debates, organised debates/lectures about the opened questions?

What, you feel now like little children waiting for grownups to say START?


hmmmm .... i thought age is calculated in activedays O.o

i would hope for those that raised the questions to open up for debate the questions they raised, if they asked the question then i would think they want an answer to it, so the debate would be helpfull for them to discover the answer

...or something

Oh, did i forget to mention the reward is not given just like that?
I surely hope that too, it would be most interesting to hold debates on matters you reasly seek answers too not just want to tell others about them.

We could hold a competition after this, who runs the longest debate, meaning who can hold people the longest time interested in whats talked.

(i managed 9 hours yupyyyyyy .. no, i am not competing!)

Haha. I think the most ammount of posts will be a better judge of captivating questions. The responses would need to be real responses and not single sentence responses with no point.

it's soooo tempting to try and beat Mur's record, does the poser of the question need to be awake through it all?

Oh dude, just take something extremely controversial/taboo, which is bound to offend someone, making him or her flame the topic with posts. Nah it's better to see how long it lasts, better test. Cuz you know, topics can go offtopic quite often.

[quote name='Metal Bunny' post='34145' date='Jun 20 2009, 08:31 PM']Oh dude, just take something extremely controversial/taboo, which is bound to offend someone, making him or her flame the topic with posts. Nah it's better to see how long it lasts, better test. Cuz you know, topics can go offtopic quite often.[/quote]

Yah, true, but then you wouldn't count those posts, right?

Edit: Meh, answered my own question.

I suppose one could go on quality too. That however is subjective, so there would need to be a judge (Mur probably).

Edited June 23, 200917 yr by Guybrush Threepwood