Grido Posted July 27, 2009 Report Posted July 27, 2009 I can see problems arising in the future with people having permanent access into LR through the back entrance.. The back entrance is an RPC clickable item, meaning it can be used to put quest information on it. If someone buys the perma access Wish from the shop then they will not be able to use the clickable as they would just go through into LR when they click it, this would then stop them from being able to complete any quests using that item without help of some form... Could simply say "well don't use it as a clickable" then in which case why is it one? umm, yeah Any thoughts on that at all? ~1am Ramblings of a Crazy man.
Ignatious Posted July 27, 2009 Report Posted July 27, 2009 As the saying goes - be careful what you wish for. Nex and Prince Marvolo 1 1
Nex Posted July 27, 2009 Report Posted July 27, 2009 that's what i initially thought too, but i figured it'd be relatively easy to fix this problem by either: 1. adding an option to the rpc item that is unlocked by chosing the wish which lets you enter loreroot via back entrance. since you'd first get the normal rpc-item menu you could still do quests involving this item. 2. use an alt that doesn't have this wish to do the part of the quest that involves this item.
Grido Posted July 28, 2009 Author Report Posted July 28, 2009 1st idea sounds good, not sure how easy/hard it would be to implement it though second means the player would *have* to have an alt which is kinda bad
Udgard Posted July 28, 2009 Report Posted July 28, 2009 And that doesn't always work.. if a quest involves giving certain trigger keys, alts would be unusable for that quest.
Prince Marvolo Posted July 28, 2009 Report Posted July 28, 2009 What about making an arrow there instead of clicking the RPC Clickable item
Death Bell Posted July 28, 2009 Report Posted July 28, 2009 marvolo has a good point... have a arrow there only the people who wished for the back door entrance is allowed if others click it says... cant allow you
Liberty4life Posted July 28, 2009 Report Posted July 28, 2009 well whole passage seams a funny rpc item.... i mean road and few trees what kind of item is that, in my opinion that should not be item at all, same with marind balcony thing Kyphis the Bard 1
Death Bell Posted July 28, 2009 Report Posted July 28, 2009 [quote name='Liberty4life' date='28 July 2009 - 08:41 PM' timestamp='1248793890' post='38108'] well whole passage seams a funny rpc item.... i mean road and few trees what kind of item is that, in my opinion that should not be item at all, same with marind balcony thing [/quote] yes i agree with liberty
Phantom Orchid Posted September 5, 2009 Report Posted September 5, 2009 I have a couple of cents of input to throw in... When I obtained permanent access to LR back entrance through wish-shop I was under the impression that this was the spell which 'opens the gates' - and through which others would be allowed entrance through, briefly, as the spell allows. My character was banking on this for roleplay purposes; for I would not have spent a wishpoint on this had I known it 'only' gave [i]me[/i] thru access. Blessings, Poe
Root Admin Chewett Posted September 5, 2009 Root Admin Report Posted September 5, 2009 [quote name='Phantom Orchid' date='05 September 2009 - 09:33 PM' timestamp='1252182801' post='40961'] I have a couple of cents of input to throw in... When I obtained permanent access to LR back entrance through wish-shop I was under the impression that this was the spell which 'opens the gates' - and through which others would be allowed entrance through, briefly, as the spell allows. My character was banking on this for roleplay purposes; for I would not have spent a wishpoint on this had I known it 'only' gave [i]me[/i] thru access. Blessings, Poe [/quote] Actually you assumed it did something it did not, its not really anyones fault that you assumed you would get the spell to open it, Rather than permanent access as it said
Windy Posted September 6, 2009 Report Posted September 6, 2009 Personally, I think the back entrance should have guardians blocking it like the front entrance. If the back exit is easily entered, why bother? Let people work for it.
Sparrhawk Posted September 6, 2009 Report Posted September 6, 2009 Well technically people do still have to work to enter the back entrance unless they are spelled in and the people that have the spells earnt them, On the other side to spend a wishpoint to gain perm access is still working for it you have to pass a wishpoint worthy quest before hand which in my opinion is alot harder than defeating a couple of guards if there were guards at the back aswell alot would enter that way with ease.
Udgard Posted September 6, 2009 Report Posted September 6, 2009 [quote name='Leucretia' date='06 September 2009 - 07:03 AM' timestamp='1252195414' post='40967'] Personally, I think the back entrance should have guardians blocking it like the front entrance. If the back exit is easily entered, why bother? Let people work for it. [/quote] Maybe if someone gets KC back from retirement...
Root Admin Chewett Posted September 6, 2009 Root Admin Report Posted September 6, 2009 [quote name='Udgard' date='06 September 2009 - 05:40 AM' timestamp='1252212029' post='40974'] Maybe if someone gets KC back from retirement... [/quote] even if he came back from retirement would he really guard LR? since they did kick him out and all, Rather unfairly also. Kyphis the Bard 1
Udgard Posted September 6, 2009 Report Posted September 6, 2009 (edited) Actually, one person offended him, and he left (I still can't understand what he <edit: the offender> was thinking). Loreroot never kicked him. (And by hierarchy, he had the authority to kick everyone in GotR, not otherwise) Edited September 6, 2009 by Udgard Kyphis the Bard 1
Shadowseeker Posted September 6, 2009 Report Posted September 6, 2009 Getting that spell to open lore is different..you spend one to walk in by yourself, whereas buying it would mean you can let others pass as well, just like with necro. And the name itself stated it as it is, so well..bad luck I guess. Kyphis the Bard 1
Windy Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 As Windy I see the pros and cons of the back entrance. Personally, I think access to the back entrance should be for Lorerootians and COE only and for one good reason. It is a shorter route to GGG and saves a whole lot of AP. Especially now when we are all trying to get 100 Bursts! XD Kyphis the Bard 1
Udgard Posted October 17, 2009 Report Posted October 17, 2009 Is this issue solved yet? This one really keeps me from buying the perm access from the shop xD
Death Bell Posted October 17, 2009 Report Posted October 17, 2009 just buy the perm back entrance access man. I don't think it will be made just for lore root people since already many have bought the back entrance wish. Watcher and dst 1 1
Pipstickz Posted October 17, 2009 Report Posted October 17, 2009 Why would it be for just Lorerootians? :/ Kyphis the Bard and Jubaris 2
Grido Posted October 17, 2009 Author Report Posted October 17, 2009 err, Bell, did you read what the topic was about? because if you did, your responce makes no sense
Death Bell Posted October 17, 2009 Report Posted October 17, 2009 errr grido i was answering to udgard actually. "Is this issue solved yet? [b][u]This one really keeps me from buying the perm access from the shop xD [/u][/b]"
Grido Posted October 17, 2009 Author Report Posted October 17, 2009 (edited) and i was asking what you were on about, udgard is talking about what the topic is about, to refresh your memory; [quote]I can see problems arising in the future with people having permanent access into LR through the back entrance.. The back entrance is an RPC clickable item, meaning it can be used to put quest information on it. If someone buys the perma access Wish from the shop then they will not be able to use the clickable as they would just go through into LR when they click it, this would then stop them from being able to complete any quests using that item without help of some form... Could simply say "well don't use it as a clickable" then in which case why is it one? umm, yeah Any thoughts on that at all? ~1am Ramblings of a Crazy man.[/quote] and your comment seemed to have no relevance to it Edited October 17, 2009 by Grido
Death Bell Posted October 17, 2009 Report Posted October 17, 2009 okay i don't wanna argue.. my bad. sorry
Recommended Posts