Fyrd Argentus's Crabapple Tree does protect to multirandom creature(s) of Fyrd Argentus and:
- Protection effect: 1170
- Magnolia Tree will be protected by Crabapple Tree with 1170 defence for next 2 rounds, but caster looses 1170 vitality and remains with 5256 vitality
- Protection effect: 1170
- The Landlord will be protected by Crabapple Tree with 1170 defence for next 2 rounds, but caster looses 1170 vitality and remains with 4256 vitality
- Protection effect: 1170
- Imperial Aramor will be protected by Crabapple Tree with 1170 defence for next 2 rounds, but caster looses 1170 vitality and remains with 856 vitality

****** So 5256 minus 1170 is what....4256?
****** So 4256 minus 1170 is what.... 856?

i'd lie if i said i was 100% certain, because i have no target to test on right now, but i think that the 'and remains with' goes for the protected, not the protecting creature.
I'll edit once i find a matching target to test on^^

confirmed, the remaining VE comes from the creatures that were protected, not the creature that protected... it's just written a little confusing

Edited September 21, 201015 yr by Burns

So if you're right Burns, the bug is that it is checking the wrong creature. You should get status on the ve that changed - i.e., the caster.

[quote name='Fyrd Argentus' timestamp='1286113708' post='69559']
So if you're right Burns, the bug is that it is checking the wrong creature. You should get status on the ve that changed - i.e., the caster.
[/quote]

There is no bug there, there is just too less information (is it said : for your own sake).
Anyway, say thank you for that much info as it is as 2 months ago the damage to itself was missing too.


In time, the logs will be more comprehensible, but unfortunately there will be too much information.

Thank you then. Onwards and upwards!

closed and moved