dst Posted January 19, 2014 Report Posted January 19, 2014 The council could very well (partially) exist of representatives from such groups. For example the treasurer could be someone from the Treasure Keepers. The PC will then be able to make decisions that go beyond the individual groups, but should be able to delegate the work back to them, making it easier to actually get things done. Pointless. Bureaucratic. Time consuming. Ivorak, Sir Blut, Blackthorn and 3 others 3 3 Quote
Eagle Eye Posted January 20, 2014 Report Posted January 20, 2014 My opinion; what about another voting 4 public council Option 1 4 main lands Marind's bell Loreroot Golemus Golemicarum Necrovion The king of his Land can nominate of 1 or 2 member of his land. Hoping citizen is allowing or not Option 2 Marind's Bell Magicduel Archive Lands Golemus Golemicarum Loreroot The tribunal No Mands Land Underground We can choose by voting and pick 4 lands By voting of council/chewett/Mur or voting public voting Any additional pls edit dst 1 Quote
Ackshan Bemunah Posted January 20, 2014 Report Posted January 20, 2014 Let's just have the RPCs vote on it. Chewett and dst 2 Quote
Root Admin Chewett Posted January 20, 2014 Author Root Admin Report Posted January 20, 2014 Let's just have the RPCs vote on it.Unless im very much mistaken, you are trolling this again. Further trolling and I will have to ban you from any of my development/discussion posts again Ackshan. It gets very old becuase you do this to nearly everything.My opinion; what about another voting 4 public councilOption 14 main landsMarind's bellLorerootGolemus GolemicarumNecrovionThe king of his Land can nominate of 1 or 2 member of his land. Hoping citizen is allowing or notOption 2Marind's BellMagicduel Archive LandsGolemus GolemicarumLorerootThe tribunalNo Mands LandUndergroundWe can choose by voting and pick 4 landsBy voting of council/chewett/Mur or voting public votingAny additional pls editSurely option 2 is very likely to lead to option one just due to the vast differences in population of the main lands and other lands? Pipstickz and Ackshan Bemunah 1 1 Quote
Rophs Posted January 20, 2014 Report Posted January 20, 2014 There are other things that MD needs more than PC. I'd personally rather see more work done on AUTUMN2050 as opposed to a second trial of PC. Quote
Ackshan Bemunah Posted January 20, 2014 Report Posted January 20, 2014 Unless im very much mistaken, you are trolling this again. Further trolling and I will have to ban you from any of my development/discussion posts again Ackshan. It gets very old becuase you do this to nearly everything. (Despite multiple long discussions about it, I don't know where you're getting this perception. You seem to call "trolling" anything where you missed the real intention, even if you later find it.) In terms of kings voting on a council whose purpose is essentially to have MD create things meaningful, or "to manage, organise, and do things in MD"...well, that's also what the kings do, that's what the RPCs do. It might seem logical to have people who know how to do something decide who has that ability, but in this case it might not be the best plan. They don't really need to form a council, but I do believe it would be good to have some central organisation. (Normal council could take on that role, but because they're unknown there also is a certain distance to the normal folks.) (notable that the RPCs did their job individually...not in a council, though there were some meetings, not very productive ones.) And since from our conversation it seems to bother you...yes, it's what they do, even though they don't exist right now. If they exist again, it would be what they do, again. (I really try not to wear masks here. It bothers me, a lot, when you think you see the opposite of that, and I wish you knew better. If you think it's spam, call it spam, take it out, warn me.) -- Separately: The biggest problem with these positions seems to be that they break a person's energy cycle. If someone doesn't have opportunity to recharge from MD within MD, they become inactive, simple as that, then there's nothing to pull them back except whatever the world happens to throw at them to remind them of us. (anyone who finds this interesting, ask to see ackshan's knowledge doc.) Why not elect 2 members to PC and have Chew/Mur appoint 2 members? The appointed member could be changed as needed and could replace Chewy having to spend so much time with the PC. That way the interests of the players and the admin are represented in decision making process. I also think that anytime a member of the PC, whether elected or appointed needs to stand down, a new member should be elected/appointed in their place. Not necessarily. We can handle periods of inactivity, the problem is when the role itself makes them afraid/reluctant to come back when they have to/want to leave. To my eyes the lack of this problem is why kings have worked out so far. Chewett and dst 2 Quote
Rophs Posted January 20, 2014 Report Posted January 20, 2014 (edited) Ackshan there are no longer any "official' RPCs. Dig deep into the announcements and read up on what happened during "The Festival of Pain". Mur demoted them all. (Except maybe Grido because he appears as an RPC on the Top WP list for some reason, and so do Peace, Raven, and yrth) Edited January 20, 2014 by Rophs Chewett and Ackshan Bemunah 1 1 Quote
Ackshan Bemunah Posted January 20, 2014 Report Posted January 20, 2014 Ackshan there are no longer any "official' RPCs. Dig deep into the announcements and read up on what happened during "The Festival of Pain". Mur demoted them all. (Except maybe Grido because he appears as an RPC on the Top WP list for some reason, and so do Peace, Raven, and yrth) I've read it, Rophs. yes, it's what they do, even though they don't exist right now. If they exist again, it would be what they do, again. dst and Chewett 2 Quote
Root Admin Chewett Posted January 20, 2014 Author Root Admin Report Posted January 20, 2014 (Despite multiple long discussions about it, I don't know where you're getting this perception. You seem to call "trolling" anything where you missed the real intention, even if you later find it.)Here I publically apologise for calling the first post trolling. Ackshan explained his point more clearly here, and now we can all discuss it rather than it being a spammish comment that looks like he thinks RPC's are still around.And since from our conversation it seems to bother you...yes, it's what they do, even though they don't exist right now. If they exist again, it would be what they do, again.I disagree entirely here. They were removed becuase the structure didnt work. Why remake an organisation that didnt work? I am considering remaking the RPC structure but I most definately will not be remaking it like it was. Your tense structure is plainly wrong also. Its what they did, not do. (I really try not to wear masks here. It bothers me, a lot, when you think you see the opposite of that, and I wish you knew better. If you think it's spam, call it spam, take it out, warn me.)I did call it out? Unsure what you mean here. Ackshan there are no longer any "official' RPCs. Dig deep into the announcements and read up on what happened during "The Festival of Pain". Mur demoted them all. (Except maybe Grido because he appears as an RPC on the Top WP list for some reason, and so do Peace, Raven, and yrth)Agreed here Rophs, And for information all RPC's were demoted, the WP list is coded badly so it only updates the names when the person gets a WP. Grido last got a WP back in the days he was RPC. This stands for all those who have odd/wrong playernames. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.