i wasnt talking about medicine reggie. I was talking about SUrgery. I never took up medicine because i couldnt see what I was doing. It is all based on assumption that a particular drug works in a particular way. In my field If I cut something I know that cutting it will cause a certain effect. Because its right infront of my eyes. I know that if an artery is cut it will bleed whereas when a nerve is cut it wont. MD is not like that. If there is an angien at the necro gates, I dont know if its a guardian, if its a balancing agent, or if its just there for beautification. I present a hundred theories and if mur says one of my theories is correct, does that mean that the 99 other theories i considered are wrong? Thats why I like combat. If I attack with a certain crit in a certain way I know what it will do. I know its absolute. I know that if I pick up a memory stone with a detector how many memory stones it will pick up and how much gain i'll get in my skill. Its absolute. Its fixed. Rest isnt. I dont know what the faceless angien signifies, I dont know what the crowned angien signifies, there are so many cultures with so many different beliefs. MD is built on one person's imagination. One who expands his imagination sometimes basing on the opinions of other people who look at his creation through different eyes. IS MD research absolute? Can I be certain that I am looking at a picture through the eyes of the creator? No. Not really. And thats what makes me so demotivated when it comes to research.
When there is an assumption about a lost artifact that has been found, sure people guess about the pictures painted on it and the shape that has been carved. But nothing is confirmed till there is documented proof through the creator's eyes. When a critic comments on a piece of poetry and its assumed meanings after the poet has passed away, how can one be sure that it is exactly what the poet wants to convey? I find that very uncomfortable.