Grido Posted August 31, 2012 Report Posted August 31, 2012 I would suggest that a player is able to rearrange (manually) the order of creatures within their bestiaries. I mean both within a single one, and should you have more than one, between books. If they're for collating and such, surely you should be able to rearrange them into a more appealing order? Watcher and Liberty4life 1 1 Quote
Peace Posted September 5, 2012 Report Posted September 5, 2012 I remember trying to do this with my shades and swordsmen but eventually they were immortalized based on ID. Also, the description is a one time thing and any mistakes you do there can't be changed. Quote
Grido Posted September 5, 2012 Author Report Posted September 5, 2012 which is why I would propose the change, so that it doesn't matter which order you sacrifice them in, as you'd then be able to arrange them nicely later Quote
Seigheart Posted September 5, 2012 Report Posted September 5, 2012 I don't think either should be changed. It is a book to immortalize your creatures. If you can't proofread your submission, don't submit it. Simple, no? Watcher, dst and The Warrior 1 2 Quote
Grido Posted September 5, 2012 Author Report Posted September 5, 2012 I wasn't suggesting rewriting the reason or whatever. I was suggesting placing the pages in a different order, like with a scrap book you would be able to take a page out of one, and put it into another, or swap round the order of them. Fine with not changing the text, but why are you against the idea or rearranging the order of them? Ivorak and Watcher 1 1 Quote
Seigheart Posted September 5, 2012 Report Posted September 5, 2012 Because, its a timeline of when you sacrificed the creatures. It shouldn't change. dst, The Warrior, Watcher and 2 others 1 4 Quote
Grido Posted September 5, 2012 Author Report Posted September 5, 2012 Why not just stick a timestamp on it then? Why does it have to be in chron order? Quote
Seigheart Posted September 5, 2012 Report Posted September 5, 2012 Because, when you write a book, you write from the start, and then continue along until you reach the finish. dst, Liberty4life, Menhir and 1 other 4 Quote
Watcher Posted September 5, 2012 Report Posted September 5, 2012 [quote name='Seigheart' timestamp='1346878231' post='121474'] Because, when you write a book, you write from the start, and then continue along until you reach the finish. [/quote] It is obvious you have never written a book before. (Zl-eye-f)-nea, The Warrior, ignnus and 4 others 5 2 Quote
Peace Posted September 5, 2012 Report Posted September 5, 2012 Also, I don't know how many creatures you have immortalized, Seigheart, but in my case of six, I did not sacrrifice them in the order you see them and I know that from the sequences of each text given. The creatures where displayed by order of ID if you had noticed them. So, for me I do like this idea. Quote
Seigheart Posted September 6, 2012 Report Posted September 6, 2012 Odd, mine were in order of when I sacced them, which also relates to their id, so I never noticed. And no, I have not written an actual novel before. But when I write in a book, I write on the first page, and when it's full, I move to the second, etc. I also read it that was as well. dst, ignnus and The Warrior 3 Quote
No one Posted September 6, 2012 Report Posted September 6, 2012 From my point of view: why not. Order them but inside a single book. I don't know if it is possible, but there should be a way to merge books so that you can increase it's size Watcher and Grido 1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.