Was inspired by this mood panel posting by Mallos and think it should be brought to question.



It's no secret I have my own reservations and distaste towards Sieg, and I have no qualms in rehashing those concerns here.

But in day 1 of his trial, he's goaded arguments and his impartiality is well in consideration of whether he is actually befit for the position.

I would never allow someone freely using slurs to have a position to moderate posts. The amount of damage they do to someone's person-- in game or not-- is atrocious.

Let us review:
This is the same man who stole artwork.
Repeated controversies in his time.
Baiting and continuously pushing arguments for the sake of.
Stating misinformation and when called out, playing the victim.

I understand that MD is running low on competent, capable people to manage, advertise, and assist it, but let's not forget who and what we're dealing with.

Edit: Edited to have a better screenshot of context.

Edited 16 hours ago16 hr by Curiose

Oh, I can't wait to see what happens with this. grabs some popcorn

Do you have any sort of proof? Or are you just spouting more nonsense off?

I didn't "steal" artwork. I claimed it was my own. Like 15 years ago. Get over it.

Edited 13 hours ago13 hr by Seigheart

While I know that Seigheart's past has not been without controversies, I have had nothing but pleasant interactions with him ever since returning to MD.

I also have fate in Chewett's judgement on this, there is no one with whom Seigheart has fight more over the 20 years of this game's existence than him. If Chewett believes Seigh deserves a chance, I see no reason not to give it to him.

It is always good to remain vigilant, but let's watch his actions, rather than get stuck on his past from many years ago.