Orlando Gardiner

Not that I bother that much, but isen't this spoiling either? I mean, sharing information about the game people would have to find out theirself? I was not even alloud to say I could give information regarding the Reindrach his abilities, so why are you alloud to give information whatever a angien is tainted or not?

just a small wondering of mine..

greetings, orlando.

http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/topic/6084-a-huuuge-md-chatbox/



not for the game, but for all of us! a huge chatbox (with sections?) which we can use to chit chat all the time, without spamming the forum or being on certain places in the game(and exspecially for everyone switching mp level who can't roam free!)

Well, as in my discription, For everyone who wants to chit chat. I mean, I am turning to mp5 right now(yes I know, I myself think I am great to)..

but the problem is, except for the mood panel on both the game and the forum, there is no way to keep on chatting. and even when you can't find eachother, it will be hard to keep track. well, it would also be a bit spoilish because it would be to easy to find everyone, with one big community speak and the ingame places will be used less as places of talking. But what would you think?

not a good idea to have a huge panel where we can talk? shoulden't be to much work, everyone contected to the forum should be able to log in with their forum account.

Will I be the only one using this, or are there others willing to join?

greetings, Orlando.

http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/topic/6084-a-huuuge-md-chatbox/



not for the game, but for all of us! a huge chatbox (with sections?) which we can use to chit chat all the time, without spamming the forum or being on certain places in the game(and exspecially for everyone switching mp level who can't roam free!)

It could be an option, if Mur actually had NOTHING to do besides eating out of his nose. otherwise, to much work for a bit of fun, where people wont look at a couple of weeks after release..

Chewett.., nice work. You DO know it was mainly about the tree right? You tended more care of the surroundings:P

Chewett.., nice work. You DO know it was mainly about the tree right? You tended more care of the surroundings:P

[quote name='Chewett' date='25 December 2009 - 08:06 PM' timestamp='1261771607' post='51045']
Perhaps you should level them, Anything more would be a spoiler
[/quote]

You're absolutly right.., but I am one of those impatient players..

[quote name='Chewett' date='25 December 2009 - 08:06 PM' timestamp='1261771607' post='51045']
Perhaps you should level them, Anything more would be a spoiler
[/quote]

You're absolutly right.., but I am one of those impatient players..

Chewett.., nice work. You DO know it was mainly about the tree right? You tended more care of the surroundings:P

His idea about the knight is pretty good, indeed giving them a weakness. but what if you give drachorns only the possibility to attack creatures with more than 20% of their vitality? that way it's useless to only have drachorns, because they can't finish of the job( something like their pride of attacking such a inferior creature). And you wont have to have special creatures with them, just others. bringing some more tactics's back into the game with drachorns.

I just simply agree. I mean, Doesen't the drachorn has his flaw? I suppose it has, but haven't been able to check it already. but it should just be harder to get them, instead if making a limit. like: you can still buy them for 51 credits. but it costs you 5000 honour and 500 loyalty and a wishpoint or so .., or less exspensive but you get the idea. you need to pay money, but you have to be a strong player to.

I just simply agree. I mean, Doesen't the drachorn has his flaw? I suppose it has, but haven't been able to check it already. but it should just be harder to get them, instead if making a limit. like: you can still buy them for 51 credits. but it costs you 5000 honour and 500 loyalty and a wishpoint or so .., or less exspensive but you get the idea. you need to pay money, but you have to be a strong player to.

I just simply agree. I mean, Doesen't the drachorn has his flaw? I suppose it has, but haven't been able to check it already. but it should just be harder to get them, instead if making a limit. like: you can still buy them for 51 credits. but it costs you 5000 honour and 500 loyalty and a wishpoint or so .., or less exspensive but you get the idea. you need to pay money, but you have to be a strong player to.

[quote name='Nex' date='08 December 2009 - 11:45 PM' timestamp='1260315915' post='49473']
[b]regarding alts/mains:[/b]
an obvious problem: how do you define alt and main? is the first char always the main? what if you mainly play your second or third, will you lose out on various possibilities because the first registered account would have had the chance to do this and that?

an example:
at least 3 of my chars could have been considered 'mains'. the first was mainly RP, the second, was originally used to test storymode and the finer points of battle mechanics and later became my 'main' for quite some time, then 'alt'-ish again when i started playing V.


[b]regarding alt abuse:[/b]
an easy if inelegant solution would be to limit age based WPs to wishes that can only really benefit the activator. no use to farm alts for WPs when your 'main' can't benefit from it. you could use them for RP purposes or to test certain options/wishes, which is one of the things alts [b]can[/b] be used for.
[/quote]


Well, there will be just one down side, indeed everyone's first account should count als main, meaning that only people who use another account than their first will lose a small benefit. I's just a choise you can make, no one forces you to use another account..

You wont be charged when the code you send is wrong, so that's not a possibility. But I have some problems to, but that's after recieving the code and when adjusting them it says it's wrong. than you have the possibility that is has gone up. I should contact Mur or whoever is in charge of the MD credit aspect, and ask them if they know what could have gone wrong, and how to recover your money..

When hearing everyone and think of it more clearly, I think there is no such thing as a good abuse-proof way of doing this. so it's either life with it or don't award the wishpoints. I mean, we can let mur do a lot of extra work by checking everything manually, but that would just be sick and annoying. he's trying to do something nice, we shoulden't punish him for that..

if there is no way Mur doesen't have to do much extra work, and no way to make it abuse-proof, than we should perhaps see of this plan, and do it the old fashion way..

[quote name='Nex' date='08 December 2009 - 11:45 PM' timestamp='1260315915' post='49473']
[b]regarding alts/mains:[/b]
an obvious problem: how do you define alt and main? is the first char always the main? what if you mainly play your second or third, will you lose out on various possibilities because the first registered account would have had the chance to do this and that?

an example:
at least 3 of my chars could have been considered 'mains'. the first was mainly RP, the second, was originally used to test storymode and the finer points of battle mechanics and later became my 'main' for quite some time, then 'alt'-ish again when i started playing V.


[b]regarding alt abuse:[/b]
an easy if inelegant solution would be to limit age based WPs to wishes that can only really benefit the activator. no use to farm alts for WPs when your 'main' can't benefit from it. you could use them for RP purposes or to test certain options/wishes, which is one of the things alts [b]can[/b] be used for.
[/quote]


Well, there will be just one down side, indeed everyone's first account should count als main, meaning that only people who use another account than their first will lose a small benefit. I's just a choise you can make, no one forces you to use another account..

[quote name='Nex' date='08 December 2009 - 11:45 PM' timestamp='1260315915' post='49473']
[b]regarding alts/mains:[/b]
an obvious problem: how do you define alt and main? is the first char always the main? what if you mainly play your second or third, will you lose out on various possibilities because the first registered account would have had the chance to do this and that?

an example:
at least 3 of my chars could have been considered 'mains'. the first was mainly RP, the second, was originally used to test storymode and the finer points of battle mechanics and later became my 'main' for quite some time, then 'alt'-ish again when i started playing V.


[b]regarding alt abuse:[/b]
an easy if inelegant solution would be to limit age based WPs to wishes that can only really benefit the activator. no use to farm alts for WPs when your 'main' can't benefit from it. you could use them for RP purposes or to test certain options/wishes, which is one of the things alts [b]can[/b] be used for.
[/quote]


Well, there will be just one down side, indeed everyone's first account should count als main, meaning that only people who use another account than their first will lose a small benefit. I's just a choise you can make, no one forces you to use another account..

I'm with you.

I mean, if you get skill dmg for losses, you probably decide not to want them, and log of.

in exchange, it iwll be harder to get wins.., so people try to protect their balance better.., by trying to lose as les as possible.., how? by logging of..


this is a spiral which has to be broken, otherwise people will log of more, and the whole fighting part of magicduel will be ruined..