Miq

2 x Pimp age 112 (Highest bid 3sc each) TS age 68 will sell to highest bidder on 21. Dec

Nutcracker 10sc You could but up some reserves or something so one would have an idea what is satisfying bid.

[quote name='Chewett' timestamp='1290932562' post='73534'] Logically someone would keep a list, or who can be contacted and who wants cards so they can be found easier. [/quote] Some sort of a list would be nice indeed. I mean i'd be in but i Really am not a pm person

So: Angien III sold to Throm for 4 sc TS sold to Kamisha for 12 sc Angien II sold to anonymous for 1 sc Jokers will be sacced Winners please contact me ingame Mod's please close Miq

True love has always been interesting.

I Joker Age 498 [claw2] [emeraldglare] II Angien Age 353 [emeraldglare] III Angien Age 190 [claw2] [kellethafire] [enlightning] [emeraldglare] Curent bid 4 sc IV Tormented Soul Age 201 [claw2] [emeraldglare] [blooddrop1] Current bid 11 sc V Joker Age 300 [claw1] [emeraldglare] Will be sold to highest bidder in 5 days.

when i say regen i mean the regen timer (just in case) You disagree that the timer and the max ap are the most relevant bonuses? Also the lands could have big stat bonus if all the citizens are one the land (at case of war?)

I agree the alliances should have different bonuses. some have short regen other lots of max and so on.

So i had yesterday a thought about the citizenship without an alliance (i did vote for making the citizenship functional myself). The thing is right now citizenship is all essentially good without bad. So what i want to propose is that the bonuses to be shifted. The timer and max ap/ep (dunno about the land regen) to go to alliance and the remaining land bonuses be influenced by the oneness of the land. just an idea. Miq

Surely a work of some degree of genius if noone can find the origin of the live feed. Maybe a door to door raid through MD?

0011000010001101101111010000111101 Tho now we need also the transcript of the questions behind the numbers. edit: letters also INTJ

Honestly i doubt that any vets or older players in general are spreading the way. But you see the new players keep together and if one knows all know. I had the pleasure of being antisocial enough not to speak much in my time (and also ignoring everything). In general if there is nobody to tell or show them wrong then that is the obvious course the young will take. You can't keep the information, just teach others to respect rules of spoilers. Miq

If you are abusing what is getting banned you probably deserve it. If you are not then you don't really care.

I'll add my voice to moving him to mp5.

[quote name='Prince Marvolo' date='22 August 2010 - 12:40 PM' timestamp='1282470055' post='66771'] @ Miq: because you are referring to the Savelites: What do YOU have to do with it? Do you know ANY other alliances that want to leave their land? No This whole idea is pretty pointless really… because no one WANTS to move, and the Savelites won’t move either. If you are talking about that Rhaegar could move it… 1 word: History [/quote] If no one wants to move then why the concern. I had no intention to make this a argument over savelites and princ. This is something that i feel would be a nice new addition to the game. SS why should it be so easy to overthrow a leader? Burns atm has 29k loyalty thats not exactly easy. If the other leaders go out of the ally to use regen or i don't know what and thus lose points it's their and their kings fault same if the leader can't control who comes in his alliance..... That is exactly what i would like to see. People working to keep what they have. Miq

Firs, the fact that they are land alliances does not mean that they are for granted. You'll become a king without an army. You can always buy an army or create a militia. This is why i also suggested an king only alliance. (i got most of this idea when you wrote that you might ask the savelite alliance removed). Yrth and Grido have a better point here but I for example don't see why Mur should be involved in everything. Princ could have asked Mur to move it and vote in alliance. I'd just think it much more beautiful if the mechanism would be in the game not in the god. I know this might create a big mess but in the end it would make the politics more intricate and people more careful leaving alliance just for some gain. Miq

Ave, I wanted to success a slight change in how all the alliances work. Considering that now the kings have ultimate power over the alliances i'd like to see that the the allies can escape a land. That is the leader can start a escape and would require for example 50% of the members to agree to run. The ally in it's fullness can run to any land or become landless (getting hostile land penalties anywhere) but getting an ok from the new land king is a must as he can excommunicate you. Along with that the sceptres of excom. should get a timer of say 24h so that the alliance leader has some time to organise a escape if he so manages. (the timer should also be on leaving the land so that the king would have a chance of enforcing his will. but i haven't really figured how yet) I think that would help the loyalty (not the loyalty points) of players one way or another, and also force kings to manage his alliances better if he wishes to keep them. Also the kings in my mind should not be members of big alliances. So i'd success a small alliance for each king called the Court or the Throne (with something like 2-5 seats). Feel free to disagree. Miq

Close this topic please. Anyone interested in these creatures find me in game.

I see the vampire and it stayed the same after shuffle. Also i accidentally clicked the change button on it and was denied (luckily). PS now i see the unicorn out of the blue

5 sc

[quote name='death ray' date='12 August 2010 - 11:18 PM' timestamp='1281644302' post='65972'] 10 silver? for drach. [/quote] I'm not that desperate

My services for a month.