Fate of the TK Ally

[Seigheart]

[quote name='Phantom Orchid' timestamp='1347931307' post='121982']

Remember though, an alliance is not one person *smiles*

[/quote]

TKs are exempt from that rule.

[color=#0000ff]Modified for split, Burns[/color]

Edited September 19, 2012 by Burns
mod note

[Phantom Orchid]

Ah, duly noted. I was not referring to a rule insomuch as attempting to invoke the the spirit of having an attitude of which: "hey, maybe things can be better if we work together."

And I'd still like to know why you quit Seig... but I respect the decision to tell or not as your own.

[Seigheart]

The reason is for me to know. No one particular person made me quit, there wasn't any particular incident that made me quit, nor were there any of you that made me quit. Simple as that.

I left for my own reasons, and there were many.

Lets just say that I stopped caring. (which will surprise many of you that I even cared in the first place)

That is all you will hear from me on this topic.

Edited September 18, 2012 by Seigheart

[Junior]

Good Job No one for making Seig quit.

[DARK DEMON]

[quote name='Etluc' timestamp='1348002448' post='122084']
Why must you all down-vote Seigheart?
[/quote]

I agree

He isn't as bad as I first thought he was, considering what people thought of him.

In fact, he isn't bad at all in my opinion

[Peace]

I do have a question though. Or more.

Why were all members of TKs expelled from the alliance?
Did Seigheart removed them or was it Fang?
Did they leave freely or because they lost their initial leader and oppose Fang's authority now?
Will Fang run the ally all by himself now?
Will the TKs be an alliance with the exception from the rule that an ally should have more than one member within it, or will Fang hire new members?

Edited September 19, 2012 by Peace

[Seigheart]

TKs are an exception from the Ally rule because it isn't an alliance in the normal sense.

I did indeed remove all the other TKs. They were inactive and felt that he should have a fresh start.

Fang will run the TKs as he sees fit. He will attempt to do it all by himself,

[Curiose]

With a 3 month trial period, he had better hope he does well.

[dst]

If he wants to run the ally by himself then he doesn't need an ally and TK should be disbanded. The purpose of an ally/guild/whatever is to gather people with the same objective under the same roof. Besides, the idea was tested in the past and failed badly (see all the complaints towards TKs and crass inefficiency that was governing).

[Curiose]

I agree with the disbandonment of the alliance, rather than the complete disbandonment of the TKs. If Fang is having problems with loyalty and keeping the aly... wouldn't it be easier to get rid of the ally? TKs worked fine without it originally. Don't see how it cant again.

[DARK DEMON]

Or Fang can at least have SOMEONE with him

[Fang Archbane]

Purely so DST does not have a reason to complain, the Ally will be full soon enough.

Rest easy knowing that DST.

Or dont.

Your call :3

[Ackshan Bemunah]

Will you be taking applications any time soon?

[Fang Archbane]

Yes o.o

Yes I will o.o...

But I think only one position will be open if my friend in mind accepts his already given offer, if he does not, then two spaces will be available O-O;

[ZenTao]

[font=times new roman,times,serif]Seigh, I'm sorry I was not around these past few months, you know why, but while the TK's were under your leadership I enjoyed working with you and I hope you feel the same, I will no longer be able to jump to you *sigh*[/font]

[Fang Archbane]

I enjoyed Seigs leadership as well :3

And he'll always stand as my friend, even when he falls, I'll just pick him back up ^3^

But fear not Zenny D:

Now you can jump to me *-*