i see the problem md is faced with.
in wodins case a detailed description of his ROLE/POSITION should be made to make sure the idea of the ROLE wodin ullr stays true. a possible way to explain the changes in his personality and acting could be:
the great warrior passed away, his soul extinguished, the abandoned armor a mark in the land.
people from near and far visit this "grave", where the desertet remains reminds of wodin ullr. the mourning of his friends, allys can hardly reflect the mourning of the land golemus itself, for it lost a loyal friend and protector...
ancient spirits of golemus, powers of the days of old claim the abandoned warriors finery, breathing new life in this shell. not the same, but with the same purpose, he arises. the purpose of his creation. to protect golemus! ....
when travelers arive at the place of wodins last rest, the armor cannot be found anymore.
just a whistle in the wind, in tongues long forgotten:
weil den helden vieler schlachten leichter schlummer überkommen,
hat das land, ihn zu ersetzen, seine rüstung umgenommen.
do not stand at his grave and cry
he is not here - he can not die!
not the best lines, but you get the idea. someone who wields the english language better, can surely make a very atmospheric description of the events.
so i would say that roles can be past on, with a detailed role-profile, but not personalities...
pretty much agreeing to what has been stated before