nad, look what i quoted, you colored word "multiple" yoarself, i quoted "succesful multiple uses", and mine point was on whole phrase mainly on "succesful" part of it, now you even have public confirmation from bugs, but yeah in short mine point was that if somethin looks incriminating it doesnt means it actually is, or in this case, eyes can see wrong (or they cant see at all)
so in the end ya had one insufficent evidence which proved only that somethin is wrong, but which couldnt prove wut, ya gave answer to second question by yoar own indications, ya failed to provide evidence that proves yoar indication of no one "successfully using herb basket mutliple times in location with no herbs" (or in other words yoar screeny cant prove that chat lines are actually from given location)
ya sticked to most obvious possibility which wasnt the actual thing that happened, ya didnt had open enough mindset to see if there could be more possibilities that could have happened and instead ya just jumped to "conclusion", ya might ask yoarself question why others like chew didnt think the same as you
i hope this explains mine post well enough
and somebody forgot to lock this