DARK DEMON

1) Lash killed mur because he had to act in accordance with his nature 2) Lash wanted to see if Mur being alive or dead really mattered or made a difference 3) Lash killed Mur to be an opposing force to a god (god slayer) 4) The graveyard was running out of bones/skulls 5) Necrovians needed more outside-people to visit Necrovion... the hard way... 6) Lash represents death, and loves Mur, and hence to love Mur better/further, he had to embrace him

This is nonsense... I sent the PM before I saw this.

Do we only have one shot or will you tell us each time if what we have deciphered is correct or not? Also, can we submit one by one, in sync with the first question^^?

Happy birthday :)

No, lol :)) This is interesting

Oh, and double freeze can indeed hit the same slot twice, I've seen it happen, though obviously not much... Oh look, it just happened TWICE now, in a row: http://storenow.net/my/?f=fe33ecf12880c8146031934f39963193 http://storenow.net/my/?f=54e16bf565ee7c8ebaa2b513a62ed5ed

For Rophs' info, creatureboost is a percentage boost to fellow creatures, eg 20% at lowest level, that keeps increasing with each level, reaching perhaps 80% at max level of the creature. <--- just an example

Freezes are not OP. They can get extremely unlucky and annoying if many of 'em hit the same creatures. Its a do or die situation, really. If your freeze hits correctly, the defender can't do anything back. If your freeze does not hit correctly, the defender will freeze your crits and you can't do anything during the attack. The problem in my opinion is the fact that freeze completely neglects skill and is only based on luck. You can see this when the SAME rituals of attacker and defender show different outcomes due to different freeze hits. We should look for a solution for that, rather than trying to nerf freeze or antifreeze.

Lol, GG's are the strongest when paired up with rusty, imo ^_^

YES. Any freeze can land on any slot regardless of all other factors. This is why I was ranting earlier. It makes combat based more and more on luck and not on skill. In other words, you can attack a person with the same ritual 4 times but it will fail, but the 5th time with the same def it may succeed because of freeze landing on the right areas and not repeating/missing. This ruins all the "skill" part of it. That's what I've noticed this BHC, really.

This will be tested today. And yes you are right, the defender can have all his creatures frozen with no chance of antifreeze except tokens. The chances are not "thaaat" small if you have 2 double-freeze creatures and 4 single freeze.

Nothing at all works if a defender's creature/s are frozen by the attacker and there is no way to antifreeze it. No auras, no freeze and no antifreeze will be shown by the frozen creature. Its completely removed from the fight, in other words. The only way to bring it back is to have another creature, which is safe and has not been frozen by the attacker, to land its antifreeze on the frozen creature. And this is what I tested today, though by myself. I'd love to do it with you guys again :)

No, currently it does not, if the creature with antifreeze gets frozen by the attacker. Just an example: I attack with 1 rusty only, defender has 1 rein for def. My rusty freezes the rein first, because I'm the attacker. Now the rein's triple antifreeze will not work, it won't even ever happen. Are you aware of this? Because from what you say here: It shows that you are not aware and you have misunderstood what I was trying to say earlier.

I'm sorry, but this is totally insane. This will make most defenders' antifreeze completely useless because the attacker is now more likely to freeze the defender's antifreeze creatures first. Basically, your proposition would mean that there are more chances of all 6 defenders' creatures getting frozen, nothing else. Your second bullet point is equally not thought of, Rophs, because defenders' creatures will never have a chance to antifreeze in the first place; they'll already be frozen beforehand because attacker's freeze would apply before theirs. Rant: I really love how people are so much into freeze. Lets face it, apart from grinders and those with high stats and lots of tokens, we usually say that no stats/ve makes it a fair skill test, but it doesn't! As long as freeze exists, it will never be. Freeze is what is against the combat system's rule that every ritual has a counter ritual, because any ritual can be made to fail because of freeze, whether stats exist or not. Rophs' idea will only make this worse.

Happy birthday, Chewy! :D

This is not entirely true, as I have seen in my recent fights. In many cases, not just once, if defender had one creature with antifreeze/skill drain/vitality drain, and that very creature was frozen, there is no way of it getting antifrozen except tokens, nor would the skill/vit drain take place. Similarly, if defender had 2 creatures with antifreeze/skill drain/vit drain, and both got frozen by the attacker, there is no way the two could get antifrozen except tokens, nor would they cause skill/vit drain, if the remaining creatures in the defender's ritual did not have antifreeze that landed on them. Same is the case for more than 2^^

I would like to participate :)

Yes

Request---can it please be run later, maybe at sometime between 18ST and 23ST? During this time I've noticed comparatively greater activity in the realm in general. I really want to participate and cannot be available before 16ST :( From observation, 13ST is one of the least active times in the day for most people, and events like trivia aren't fun if there aren't any people.

15 silver for 7, 14 silver for 13

1 gold 11 silver for both angiens (13 silver each)

1 gold 5 silver for both angiens ---> 10 silver for each angien

1 gold for both angiens

Because you didn't favor me in this case? I don't turn against people just because of such petty things, and with people like you I don't turn against them at all. I do not look for favors. In the past in many matters you have not favored me, did I do anything? I always listened, but remained adamant, yes, because of the above stated reason. The only reason I told you to let me go was because I still cared for you and since I kept hurting you, I thought that would be best. It was the only course of action I could take because no matter how many times I tried, I failed to convince you that this is just how I am and I never mean offense unless its truly obvious. Yes, you didn't fail to understand, I failed to show. I'm in the wrong, are you happy now?

Of course, I don't openly take names like you do, but I think for your case I should next time, and forever always :D And once again, you prove ME right that you actually do think I care about my rep. Honestly, its the fact that someone can use the neg rep system wrongly like this that I gather data, not for my ego. No one -has- to think the way you do, dst -_- Individual links are not data...? Right, so why can't I go and "reconsider later" (as you said) and go about neg repping dst's last 200 posts, deciding that they are stupid? Why not, its my wish to use it however I like, right? In this case too, you'd have to decide whether my reason that "I find her posts stupid" is valid or not, but you'll most probably decide its not because its obvious I'm spamming. When its not too obvious, you can't/refuse to make that decision? Why? Its just my manner of speaking, Chewy, I cannot help it. You and dst may find it stupid or offensive at times, but I don't, because I never mean it, and anyone really who actually takes a liiiittle time to understand will realize this too. And the fact that dst is solely against this part of me, and choose this part of me as a reason to dislike me and a reason to ignore/dislike the actual content of my post, is the exact reason I will remain adamant and continue to be as I am.