Aeoshattr

There is a fictionist's house in the lands of the east...also, there's a Night Keeper you can (?) ask (and other vets).

jumping on the back of this, MP6 is supposed to be an accomplishment, a show of support and of people coming together, the realm as it stands right now is divided in where it wants to show its support, everyone has their own stances, beliefs, mentors and goals, and the current state of mp6 reflects this, i feel like changing the amount of adepts required to become mp6 diminishes that accomplishment a little. while mp6 is a great thing to have around, its really helpful with the loyalty, being able to summon, and as a show of solidarity and common ground, i feel like right now we dont have the activity to justify much, if any of this. 
i would love to be mp6 again, but the activity and the realm being so divided in its goals with the split support of the people wanting to be mp6 make it not really a feasible possibility at the moment, people will support who they support, and that should be respected. 
 

As the title says, would it be possible to have a tickbox to be able to prevent certain creatures from showing up in the altar sacrifice interface? I'm thinking that this could be something that appears in the creatures tab, next to the heal button of each creature maybe. New creatures would by default be unhidden.
I always live with the fear that I'll accidentally (and permanently as fork) sacrifice an important critter.

As the title says, would it be possible to have a tickbox to be able to prevent certain creatures from showing up in the altar sacrifice interface? I'm thinking that this could be something that appears in the creatures tab, next to the heal button of each creature maybe. New creatures would by default be unhidden.
I always live with the fear that I'll accidentally (and permanently as fork) sacrifice an important critter.

I'll host for you Aeo.
Z

Had a bit of trouble exiting Necrovion as planned on the 24th and I couldn't postpone the event for later in the night as I ended up feeling quite unwell. Apologies for any inconvenience caused. Thank you very kindly Lin, Mag, Sunny, Z!
I must come with further "bad news". I will be unable to host on the 12th of September, as I have academic matters that I must attend to and are likely to eat up my whole day. If anyone would be interested in hosting, please contact me and I'll do my best to provide materials and suggestions (maybe scripts, if necessary).
 

Well, if I don't post here it's like I didn't wish you happy birthday! Happy birthday Lin, hope your day went great.

You've linked to the exact post where Mur states depletion is not officially punishable. There is also an announcement regarding land rules. This shows a clear difference between that situation and this one - but those things aren't 'real' enough for you? I'm not entirely sure what you're getting at here?
Z

There is a clear difference between the cases you want to compare. In one, there are rules and expectations, in the other, there aren't. Read what Mallos said. Your constant linking of them does not change that and each time you try to explain it, what you do is explain why it is justified to bring any matter to a tribunal. You're right, it is. It is also the tribunal's right to throw something out. That's a judgement in it's own right. You've had one. You just don't like it.
Clearly people took issue with this when the announcement went up, as they have said they spoke with higher bodies. They got responses, and did not go public. It is now 5 months later, and because you have a personal experience you don't like, you are now making it a matter of public interest. Seems a little off to me. Again, you are totally within your right to do it.
The why you keep going on about is obvious if you just take an objective position on it, they shouldn't have to explain it to you - and I'm not about to.
Z

My two cents on the subject, I was not around for the events that transpired... so I have a bit of an outsider perspective. 
I do not see where it is abusive or misuse of power. People were killed and as such there are consequences to any actions taken. Why are you surprised at this? When you (Aethon) have used abilities available at your disposal to further your goals. 
 
As for the spells themselves, just as Mallos said by posting the announcement made on the creation of the spells. 
 
I think Azull and Syrian were within the bounds of their roles and powers to react in such a way. 
 
 
 

I don't see the situations as the same at all. I also fail to see how this current situation is an abuse, whether in inverted commas or not?
Z
 

This is a complete farce. One of the judges is openly biased, as per her own post in the previous topic, thus there is no way this is going to be a fair trial. Not to mention that the whole base for this is just... obscene. 
What's next? Players who were killed should ask for the killing tools of their murderer to be removed (or 'restricted'), and for them to be revived, because this is a restricted, limited power and it was done to them unwillingly? People who were locked in chaos? People who lost alliances, because it was done to them unwillingly? 
MD is unfair. Many people have unique, or very restricted powers. Up until now, you lot were defending the freedom of use of such powers, what happened to that?

@Aeoshattr
I promised myself not to reply, but it seems Lashtal has some good words to heed!
 

I forgot about that! Well done @Mallos
Thank sweetie Aeo for pointing it out!

This is a complete farce. One of the judges is openly biased, as per her own post in the previous topic, thus there is no way this is going to be a fair trial. Not to mention that the whole base for this is just... obscene. 
What's next? Players who were killed should ask for the killing tools of their murderer to be removed (or 'restricted'), and for them to be revived, because this is a restricted, limited power and it was done to them unwillingly? People who were locked in chaos? People who lost alliances, because it was done to them unwillingly? 
MD is unfair. Many people have unique, or very restricted powers. Up until now, you lot were defending the freedom of use of such powers, what happened to that?

This is a complete farce. One of the judges is openly biased, as per her own post in the previous topic, thus there is no way this is going to be a fair trial. Not to mention that the whole base for this is just... obscene. 
What's next? Players who were killed should ask for the killing tools of their murderer to be removed (or 'restricted'), and for them to be revived, because this is a restricted, limited power and it was done to them unwillingly? People who were locked in chaos? People who lost alliances, because it was done to them unwillingly? 
MD is unfair. Many people have unique, or very restricted powers. Up until now, you lot were defending the freedom of use of such powers, what happened to that?

This is a complete farce. One of the judges is openly biased, as per her own post in the previous topic, thus there is no way this is going to be a fair trial. Not to mention that the whole base for this is just... obscene. 
What's next? Players who were killed should ask for the killing tools of their murderer to be removed (or 'restricted'), and for them to be revived, because this is a restricted, limited power and it was done to them unwillingly? People who were locked in chaos? People who lost alliances, because it was done to them unwillingly? 
MD is unfair. Many people have unique, or very restricted powers. Up until now, you lot were defending the freedom of use of such powers, what happened to that?

This is a complete farce. One of the judges is openly biased, as per her own post in the previous topic, thus there is no way this is going to be a fair trial. Not to mention that the whole base for this is just... obscene. 
What's next? Players who were killed should ask for the killing tools of their murderer to be removed (or 'restricted'), and for them to be revived, because this is a restricted, limited power and it was done to them unwillingly? People who were locked in chaos? People who lost alliances, because it was done to them unwillingly? 
MD is unfair. Many people have unique, or very restricted powers. Up until now, you lot were defending the freedom of use of such powers, what happened to that?

This is a complete farce. One of the judges is openly biased, as per her own post in the previous topic, thus there is no way this is going to be a fair trial. Not to mention that the whole base for this is just... obscene. 
What's next? Players who were killed should ask for the killing tools of their murderer to be removed (or 'restricted'), and for them to be revived, because this is a restricted, limited power and it was done to them unwillingly? People who were locked in chaos? People who lost alliances, because it was done to them unwillingly? 
MD is unfair. Many people have unique, or very restricted powers. Up until now, you lot were defending the freedom of use of such powers, what happened to that?

This is a complete farce. One of the judges is openly biased, as per her own post in the previous topic, thus there is no way this is going to be a fair trial. Not to mention that the whole base for this is just... obscene. 
What's next? Players who were killed should ask for the killing tools of their murderer to be removed (or 'restricted'), and for them to be revived, because this is a restricted, limited power and it was done to them unwillingly? People who were locked in chaos? People who lost alliances, because it was done to them unwillingly? 
MD is unfair. Many people have unique, or very restricted powers. Up until now, you lot were defending the freedom of use of such powers, what happened to that?

Following my last topic on this subject, and the obvious agreement from some, I'd like to kindly request for an official judgement on the Nomad's 'Bring in' spells.
I'd personally like to see some form of usage rules implemented, rather than complete removal of the spell. I'd also like to ask for myself and Mallos to be removed from NC, as there is no possible route for use to escape aside dying reviving, and we were dragged in unwillingly.
@dst @Burns
-A
 

He completed my quest and used a consumable item he was awarded for completing it. I would appreciate you not making assumptions and accusations. Both him and Jubaris, actually, entered nightmode through the same means at the same time, both using up their consumables for it.
This would be probably the third thing you're trying to smear on me for whatever reason, which I did not do. Apologies would be nice

He completed my quest and used a consumable item he was awarded for completing it. I would appreciate you not making assumptions and accusations. Both him and Jubaris, actually, entered nightmode through the same means at the same time, both using up their consumables for it.
This would be probably the third thing you're trying to smear on me for whatever reason, which I did not do. Apologies would be nice

He completed my quest and used a consumable item he was awarded for completing it. I would appreciate you not making assumptions and accusations. Both him and Jubaris, actually, entered nightmode through the same means at the same time, both using up their consumables for it.
This would be probably the third thing you're trying to smear on me for whatever reason, which I did not do. Apologies would be nice

False! There is no way to check if a player was online or not other than with a print screen. So at this point all I have is your word. And of course you will "swear" that he was online. You also tend to forget that idle players cannot do anything because they are IDLE. Furthermore, there is a well known bug which shows a player as non-idle for a period of time before they vanish.
Now, one thing that is not clear to me: YOU were in night mode??? So aeoshattr helped you even more to set this up??? So not only azull and sy are involved but aeo has a finger in this pie...
Good for you lashy-boy! Good for you getting away with an abuse. Luckily you'll think twice before repeating the same scenario. Same with azull and syrian.