Manda

First off, I never denied anything to you Chewett.

What you just said, was an outright lie.

[quote]
[b]Original message:[/b]
Killing you? Why do you think it was I that killed you? O.o
Original message RE~2: Comments?
you killed me, aelis passed you the dagger, and you killed me

Dont play the fool.

[b]Your reply to this message:[/b]
Well, either way, you are dead. Are you angry?[/quote]

Anyways, this is not what the topic is about.

Chewett is right, on most accounts.

Death needs to be changed. Right now, as the Wookie has stated, community efforts are not a guarenteed way to save someone. Those with items with revival powers are not using them for fear of retribution, or simple greed.

We need a more concrete way of guarenteed revival than player cooperation, or the Council. Both are incredibly unreliable.

[quote name='Tarquinus' timestamp='1339148555' post='114059']
I don't follow you, Chewy. Shouldn't bother with what? My opinion is and always has been that talk is not enough.
[/quote]

My post was mainly a reply to Pip, I was under the impression he was saying there is no point doing anything if the council are too busy/lazy to check things happening. I also agree with you that talk and specifically this post, will not be enough

If there is anything i can do to aid the alliance, please feel free to ask me for anything.

I am completely ignoring the fact that the alliances were removed. It has happened, i feel we should all move on.

However, i do feel the rule is incorrect and that it should be changed.

I shall be opening this poll, i shall also be writing to the council with the results of the poll and asking them to consider removing Murs Rule, I do not think it fits.

The poll does not specify if the rule should have the number changed, But whether the concept of disbanding alliances based on member count.

Please vote on this matters and do not turn this into a "return X alliance back" thread. What has happened has happened. Both alliances were started to be "hibernated" so there is a chance to regain them if we, the community, wants to. But we should speak out and say we do not feel a rule should be applied.

I'd just like to point out that current morph prices are at an all time low, before this topic vanishes somewhere. I've bought one for 15gc...which is lower than I ever expected.

There has been some frustration among CoE players about the loyalty mechanic and some negative undercurrents in the MD community in general. That said, I think Lord Pip's coup did much to awaken us to our disconnection from the game, and more importantly, its "reality". I am not talking about "roleplaying", as much as I like it, but about the nature of MD as an experience, as allegory, and as a means of communicating in a different way from what you usually find on the Internet.

In my view the CoE still exists. It doesn't have official status (i.e. a badge), but it started without one. Several people have shown that they still believe in what the CoE stands for, and I think it is time I came out of my semi-dormant state to show my support.

But this is more than a matter simply of popularity. There are two issues: belief and focus. As to the first, we believe in fairness, the sharing of knowledge, and the development of [i]character[/i] - not in the sense of a character in a game, but in the sense of a person's ethics, behavior, and beliefs. As to the second, I have felt for almost a year now that the CoE has needed to change its focus with respect to the reality of MD as it has been revealed. We will show you entertaining (we hope) characters on the way, but I think we should examine what "the moon" means to MagicDuel and why the sun never sets. The CoE is not a collection of cultists devoted to a rock floating in space.

For a time we were the largest alliance in MD. There's no reason that can't happen again. I fully support Amoran's petition, but I would like to say that I appreciate the idea that changes happen in MD because they are earned.

I support this.

I support it fully.

I will be honest. I have not been active recently, but I was absolutely disgusted to log in and find that the once 30 member-strong alliance: The Children of the Eclipse, the thing that I and so many others had put so much effort into was disbanded...

Due to lack of members?

Was there not a request placed by Pipstickz to the Council to have the member count reduced so that it could be returned to us?

I have chosen to try one last time.. to give one last small effort toward regaining our alliance.

I petition that the Children of the Eclipse be returned once and for all to the members who worked so hard for it to be what it had been. Please post if you support this effort. I know it is a stretch, but I believe that there are those in the community who would want to see the Children of the Eclipse alliance revived and returned to it's founding members.

Please post if you support this effort.

well dont know how Eon back in just 1 min to the Temple and the other min was on MDP and again, have two leaders or was draged?¿

He can have it.

[s][b]Morph[/b] - 25 GC[/s] (for the record - 18 GC + 10 SC)
[b]Supercharged Heat Stone[/b] - 5 GC
[b]Weaken Stone[/b]

Other offers considered, but please be reasonable.

6 sc for all pimps

The BHC is over

First Place: Eon
Second Place: *Lightsage*
Third Place: Lone Wolf

I don't have any CTC's or the gold, so I recommend you email the council.

well dont know how Eon back in just 1 min to the Temple and the other min was on MDP and again, have two leaders or was draged?¿

hey can i have some but cheaper ?

Under the current circumstances I believe to be in a position to guarantee first placein MP5 HC.

The conditions you'll have to meet are as follows:

1. Be online/idle 24/7 during the HC (a little less could be up for discussion)

2. General willingness to follow directions (eg. accept a creature for transfer, change def rit etc.)

Offers may be made by forum PM, this is not an auction. If I accept an over no further negotiations will take place.

well dont know how Eon back in just 1 min to the Temple and the other min was on MDP and again, have two leaders or was draged?¿

well dont know how Eon back in just 1 min to the Temple and the other min was on MDP and again, have two leaders or was draged?¿

If we take the 20gc/use as a standard - I didn't notice anyone offer to use theirs for less.

The combined value of every creature you list in that post equates to 3, maybe 4, uses by my count depending on generosity of buyer. So I would figure from what you offer, buying a revive item would be out, not that I can speak for others of course.

I realise I may sound ridiculously greedy here, but meh.

I wonder how many times Eon will be allowed to win the BHC.

Why not just cloak Eon day and night?

If Eon can't fight Eon can't win right?

Uhhh, I didn't realize he was in BHC. I sincerely apologize for that. O.o I was running through loreroot to recruit some creatures and I had a bunch of heat to blow. LS was right there.


Again, sorry.

I really can't see the problem here. A BHC will start with at least 2 participants. IF you have something against it, why then sign up?

It's that simple.

[url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5rRZdiu1UE"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5rRZdiu1UE[/url]

except he has already stated that Tribunal is off limits due to the high AP movement, it was why i was kicked out of BHC a while back. I was just curious since I have screenshots of Eon back at the Dominion gate. Seems pretty accessible by normal standards....if you have several hundred East loyalty

[quote name='phantasm' timestamp='1337772591' post='112676']
soo, do these rules about restricted areas also apply to Eon? Since hes currently going to win the BHC, and his ghost is all over TB, Eon doesn't have to apply himself to the rules??
[/quote]

From the first post:
[quote]In this BHC fighters will battle all throughout the realm, excluding locations like path keeper, Fields of Fear, Inside the GG mountain, and any other area that isn't normally accessible. I'll allow WP locations.[/quote]