Jump to content

Aethon

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    377

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Aethon

  2. Fusioneers disbanding and states previous to it

    in Fusioneers

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Grido said:

    In simple terms, Blackshade has done many things against Golemus, and myself, and nothing for it. If I recall correctly (and do correct me, if I'm wrong) he said the actions against the land were because he was being laughed at and ignored, and it was to wake the land up to act as he had previously suggested. Can't remember precisely what he had suggested, but I do recall it being incredibly unlikely to happen, even with backing - which I spoke to him about at the time.

    I may have logs if you require them.

  3. Judgment on Nomad Bring-In

    in General Forum

    Posted · Edited by Aethon

    On ‎29‎/‎08‎/‎2016 at 4:07 PM, Burns said:

    General rules is not exactly what judges are for, it's more of a case-by-case thing... What you're looking for is a parliament's job :))

    I'll happily give some input and lay out what i'd definitely rule as abuse (if proven), but i'm not going to bind all future rulings to this discussion. So, if you want a post from me, it'll be all the things you definitely can't do as far as i'm concerned, but that doesn't mean that the things that are not on the list are okay in all cases.

    If you find something like that helpful, i'll try my best to provide a useful list... But i don't consider this the job of judges.

     

    28 minutes ago, Burns said:

    At longer consideration, and after Chew pointing out the obvious to me, i'll have to withdraw my previous post. There's too much risk of people considering everything that doesn't make it on the list to be okay, so i can't provide one.

    Sorry to get your hopes up.

    It's intriguing how a few people say they've had a word with Chew and Mur about this, received dismissive answers and then you decide to not announce your opinions after Chew gets involved, yet refused to give any answers on a public topic and decided to message you in private...

    Guess we'll just have to keep wasting those casts! :D

  11. Guardian of Tools, Mallos (Tribunal pub)

    in The Caretakers

    Posted

    On ‎25‎/‎08‎/‎2016 at 11:51 PM, Fang Archbane said:

    Mallos was not in the wrong.

     

    And if anyone would like to prove otherwise, please, waste your time making a lawsuit over this while we use our time efficiently.

     

    On ‎19‎/‎08‎/‎2016 at 7:55 AM, Mallos said:

    To defend the pub in the east with my tools as a Caretaker of the Tribunal, I have already spoken with phantasm the current pub owner ingame and by pm on my thoughts long ago. I had come to the conclusion you may grab as many tools from the pub as you would wish, as long as I do not catch you transferring them to alts that are your own (through way of giving them to your friends and they hoard them all too and give them to your alts perhaps?).

    Essentially don't take all the liquor or I will be mad.


    (I was hoping I wouldn't have to be the first to open a topic like this as mine is rather inconsequential in the current context of MD)

    On ‎25‎/‎08‎/‎2016 at 3:50 PM, Mallos said:

    Ok so I thought I was going crazy but maybe nadrolski is trying to top me.

    nadrolski.jpg

    Mallos took his first action with the tool legislators! It wasn't even his own tool though... I don't know why he's giving it to me.

     

    On ‎25‎/‎08‎/‎2016 at 10:00 PM, Mallos said:

    I'm sorry but I can't make a statement for MB lands as this would be above my line of command for that area. But since I have the tool I might as well do their land a favor?

    So - not his tool to use, not the area he is guardian of, admits he can't make a statement for the land - yet did it to do them a "favor" (apparently MB are unable of speaking to their own citizens, if that's the case?) - and has also stated "banned Nad for why not". Yet he's not in the wrong?

    Goodness me Fang, I'm so so happy you ran off and I didn't have to work with you in the end. Your stupidity baffles me.

  12. Judgment on Nomad Bring-In

    in General Forum

    Posted · Edited by Aethon

    Following my last topic on this subject, and the obvious agreement from some, I'd like to kindly request for an official judgement on the Nomad's 'Bring in' spells.

    I'd personally like to see some form of usage rules implemented, rather than complete removal of the spell. I'd also like to ask for myself and Mallos to be removed from NC, as there is no possible route for use to escape aside dying reviving, and we were dragged in unwillingly.

    @dst @Burns

    -A

     

  15. Bring in on Non-Rulers?

    in General Forum

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, Aeoshattr said:

    You're mistaking the new bringin with the old bringin. New one is given to kings and ex-kings who actually have lands. With Azull and Sy not having a land... guess you'll have to place the blame for them having the old, land-independent bringin on those who left 'em landless, eh?

    They made themselves landless (and chose to keep it that way - Azull even preferred it)

    And also
     

    Quote

    The two leaders of the nomads, Syrian and Azull, have been given 20 non regeneratable casts of bringin, This replaces the permanent bringin spell Azull had and represents the fading of their kingship powers

    Their kingship powers were over NC, not all of MD.

  16. Bring in on Non-Rulers?

    in General Forum

    Posted · Edited by Aethon

    After being summoned to Necro twice by Azull, I thought I'd ask; Why do Syrian and Azull have bring-in?

    This isn't the first time they've used their Bring-ins on people outside of their nomad group either (they're using Lashtal as their free murder machine). Considering this spell is given to rulers and only for their citizens, why do two ex-rulers have 20 casts of the spell and why does it work for anyone?

    Ok, so it may be given as a gift for ruling, doing well, etc, etc, but the spell should only work on those with the nomad flag. They have no rulership and no actual citizens...so I don't understand why they'd still be allowed to have it and such free reign with it?

    If they're going to have it, at least put some restrictions on it...

     

  18. Guardian of Tools, Mallos (Tribunal pub)

    in The Caretakers

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Mallos said:

    I banned him with his tool, because he was depleting water below the 66% range. To my current knowledge the water in this location will not replenish to full the next day, when I can determine if this is true or not I will allow nadrolski to have buckets again.

    So you've suddenly become the Guardian of another spot? Although it was specifically stated you may only guard one?

    And perhaps you should make a statement relating to the rules of MB if so? As currently you're just doing another Nad.

  19. Guardian of Tools, Mallos (Tribunal pub)

    in The Caretakers

    Posted

    On ‎19‎/‎08‎/‎2016 at 7:55 AM, Mallos said:

    To defend the pub in the east with my tools as a Caretaker of the Tribunal

    So why did you ban Nadrolski?

    The whole reason of making these "rules and procedures" were to stop random banning. Why make a statement of your rules and then go ahead and ban someone (that isn't even doing anything related to the pub) for no reason other than "cause why not"?

    Honestly Mallos, you're becoming more and more of a Flopshade...

     

  24. Guardian of Tools

    in New Player Roles and Legends

    Posted

    I hate to be a party pooper but...can't we just leave it as it is and just ask the  current land leaders to make a rule set up for their guardian's?

    Otherwise this'll just become another area started and not finished and thus time wasted which could have been used in more important areas (like finishing tutorial/a25...)

    The system isn't bad mechanically, it's just none of the players have really bothered announcing any rules; it's just another item to add to an inventory for power/monopoly at the moment.

×
×
  • Create New...