Chewett

When I award on wp I shall decide if I will re run it.

while running quest, apply for voting, then i can start it when needed.

Who says it was to encourage it? I dont remember Mur saying this in any case.

I also remember this coming up before an also remember the general consensus being no. But I do like the idea of reducing the affects of landholdings being good.

ORLY? i traded something to soothing this morning and saw it come up? at GOE You know they only appear for items tagged as unique? This is copied over from the old system, and not something i have changed.

I have made you mp7 Dont use the illusions otherwise you will fall back to MP5 as i dont really want to be making you mp7 repeatedly.

That was part of his quest. Thats not a bug. We specifically put the chat like that, so his specific letter would stay there.

---------------------- Should be all working now A problem with late night coding :D

Yeah, as i said new code, lemme have a lookie :D ITC should work btw, thats on the old system still.

Im looking forward to both of your plans for a nice fun complex and easy to use for new players mechanic.

Bench really does need to A) be stopped floating but B) be moved somewhere that isnt MB gates, that scene has enough items thanks Requesting this, as King of MB :)

If everyone really wants a complex idea, then put forward a suggestion. But it needs to be easily worked out for new people, because being able to get the tools should not be hard.

We give users full access to coding javascript and html. Its not extreme and has been there for years. If you dont use the interface to change pages, some movements will ban you.

Im not sure we want this here, because redirecting the user to the wrong link will get them banned. as a FYI. I dont think the ability to do this, outweighs the fact you could end up banning your user.

Cool thanks, All cases should be working because i put a direct link into that file :)

Because this isnt a quest, This is a simple game mechanic, that im looking for some input before it gets changed since we have new better tools. Its not intended to be complicated, its just resetting of items, something that every player should be able to get relatively easily. Which is espically important for upcoming autumnal quests. Its not going to be based on DNA.

Anything can be changed. The question is should it :)

As i said, working on items. Should be fixed?

As i said, working on items. Should be fixed?

Or, we can alternate, between one week knowing when it is, and one week not. so its even fairer? Then one week people generally have a good chance, then the other it can be group effort trying to get it.

Make a Decent quest Get participents Apply to use the new Quest rating system Get good rating Win WP ... PROFIT ------------- Have fun :) FAQ: Apply to use rating system - contact me with quest name, your ID and i shall provide a link. ideally via bugs at md email account

When i implemented the rain system i added a way of running any event, at any time. This means that a number of events that were stuck at specific times of the day, now could be random. This means we could, if we wanted to change the item regroup to be totally random. Pros of Totally random Makes it fairer generally stops groups of people hoarding tools Pros of distinct times Allows co-operation of gathering tools may be unfair to those whose times are bad. Changes we could make are: Random time, dont tell anyone when it is Random time, announce it in the previous weeks, so people know when Keep the current system What do people think?

Ideally, I dont do anything, and it all is fine, But i know im going to need to test it a couple times, so its going to mess things up. A seems like a drastic solution to really "stop" MD how MD is, to me B is less drastic, and will give some people chance to grab tools they might not have got.

A has no intention in letting them regen, thats a side affect Why?

Im going to be working on improving the item trading/movement system, another backend that needs some work. This means im going to be need to testing all methods of moving items, including shared regroup. I can either A) have no shared regroup this week, let me test it all and no one has shared items or B) You are lucky, and get a shared regroup every single time i run and test the script, meaning that you might hold an item for a day, to have it regroup. My working hours are going to be 20:00 to 24:00 and resets would occur during this period of time. Please provide opinions, im probably going to be doing B unless people really really want A for some reason.