Chewett

Demo should have been removed from friends, active days and items

Its a quest, to make quests. Everyone that signs up with have an oppertunity to run their quest. At the end of it the ones taht fit the criteria best win. If multiple fit it well then multiple will get wishpoints or similar rewards depending on their quest results. A good rating, in the new quest rating system. You already know how this works as you ran a quest during the MD Birthday if i am correct. I will judge the quests, along with some other people and hopefully the TK's, but i havent asked them yet. The best along with the rating system wins. The exact distribution of how the marks are awarded will not be disclosed. ----- Its not a race, because everyone will get a chance, i will close the registration once i feel an appropiate number of quests have been submitted and ran.

Work on this structural change finishes tonight hopefully.

This wasn't created to change it because I want to. Merely to explain now we could change it because previously it was based on a much more limited system.

How is it difficult?

It takes me nearly half a day or so to get to the herbs in LoTE, then i stay there until regroup so i can get loads of herbs. Getting there is a massive pain, you reset the tools too soon, it becomes impossible and not worth it.

Cool, so now non unique items should show when transferred

Probably both, mail bugs, will do it tonight :) Its also not a bug, its a known quantity. and designed that way.

I shall go around changing it to land score if you wish. If you want it offical. Because from me officially, its actually meant to be called land score. No one is right, it was called land score. Mur and i discussed this when i came out, i was very much in the mind of if you defect to a land, you do not have loyalty to your old land. And he pointed out its more accurately called land score. We also discussed ways to reduce the influence of old lands, meaning that land hoppers dont necessarily have a massive bonus. But we didnt get around to implementing it.

Looking into this further, it appears one section of the interface doesnt show trades of non unique items, and another does. Im in favour of showing non unique items in chat when trading via the rightbar, so im going to re-enable that. This is why im making it a nice function, so the interface is all in sync.

When I award on wp I shall decide if I will re run it.

while running quest, apply for voting, then i can start it when needed.

Who says it was to encourage it? I dont remember Mur saying this in any case.

I also remember this coming up before an also remember the general consensus being no. But I do like the idea of reducing the affects of landholdings being good.

ORLY? i traded something to soothing this morning and saw it come up? at GOE You know they only appear for items tagged as unique? This is copied over from the old system, and not something i have changed.

I have made you mp7 Dont use the illusions otherwise you will fall back to MP5 as i dont really want to be making you mp7 repeatedly.

That was part of his quest. Thats not a bug. We specifically put the chat like that, so his specific letter would stay there.

---------------------- Should be all working now A problem with late night coding :D

Yeah, as i said new code, lemme have a lookie :D ITC should work btw, thats on the old system still.

Im looking forward to both of your plans for a nice fun complex and easy to use for new players mechanic.

Bench really does need to A) be stopped floating but B) be moved somewhere that isnt MB gates, that scene has enough items thanks Requesting this, as King of MB :)

If everyone really wants a complex idea, then put forward a suggestion. But it needs to be easily worked out for new people, because being able to get the tools should not be hard.

We give users full access to coding javascript and html. Its not extreme and has been there for years. If you dont use the interface to change pages, some movements will ban you.

Im not sure we want this here, because redirecting the user to the wrong link will get them banned. as a FYI. I dont think the ability to do this, outweighs the fact you could end up banning your user.

Cool thanks, All cases should be working because i put a direct link into that file :)