Fenrir Greycloth

I am sure Jesus had naughty thoughts about women, doesn't make him any less good or whatever though does it? Just because I did something srupid once, does not mean I am a bad person. I paid for my mistake. I have been out of prison for two months now, have made major progress ig wise (despite the hard time people keep giving me)and done nothing to warrent this behaviour any further. I may not be the easiest person to get along with but if you asked me for help, I will help you, no matter if I am frustrated or not. Now can we get back on topic please?

Wth how do I cheat?

Now why is that?

Ahh yes I guess trust is a big issue. Especially when it's dealing with the exact locations of players and ctc codes.

I would gladly help out with the gm thing, spending a couple hours a day reading logs to prevent people from cheating, I wouldn't mind.

Burns I don't think it should be closed but a maturity check is needed. I shall wait till someone else can talk some sense into her. If at all possible.

Ummm actually I am quite the opposite. I don't do what everyone else does and honestly I coould call you the same for voicing someone elses opinions without knowing why. And isn't that exactly why this entire fiasco started?

First of all I was not aware of the being paid for the artworks, I did not quit either when I found our but this has nothing to do with that. Try dealing with this instead acting like the child you claim not to be. I was not actively seeking to destroy Mur and md'. I was not trying to get players to rebel against him. Honestly what you were doing is far worse. Grow up, take your medicine and go to bed and rest.

Yes burns I do. The original reason that was put there was because the storylune needed thoroughal testing. I believe it has been tested. If you read something in the game it does not necesarily mean it is right. For instance read the hc page and tell me how much of it is applicable now. What we have here is just a poor genral attitude to work and the right way of doing things and the easy wrong way. Mur cannot possibly police everything. That is what shoeps was for, to take care of normal game thongs so that mur could spend his time coding and developing. Perhaps this is something we should look into once more? Having a gm or two that can sift through the crap in a (mostly) unbiased way. They couldnhave a set ofnfuide lines to follow and work like an lho but with a bit more power. And if anyone thinks but look at the last gm, that person didn't have anyone to keep an eye on him. Perhaps that is a good reason to have several to keep each other in Check. Lhos could still be in place, but the gms would have more abilities to check on the honesty of players, deal with player squabbling, and other minor things.

Then they would ask an rpc for permission to make an alt I know this isn't a popular topic because a lot of people do it. An insane ammount do. But just because everyone does something does not mean it us right.

Well, it is not like we can just write a line of code and the problem is fixed. There will always need to be someone watching over the player base to make sure noone is cheating. That is one of the roles as a game manager I am afraid. Maybe we need another one?

But surely you won't sac a drachorns or bloopact or se other powerful creature. You can only get so many. Surely not all of you creatures that you use day to day are from trades? What I am guessing is that you did just as I described. And you are against it because those creatures are now useless. If you trade for a powerful creature you are not going to just give it up withoutt some serious thought. If you gave something up that is really valuable for that creature why sacc it later on? If none of the creatures you started plating with are with you right now, you probably sacced them all... But I really doubt anyone would just sacc a drachorns for a couple stat points. I have one creature I have yet to sacc and that is my bloodpact. I will not sacc him at all because he is essential to a lot of my rituals.

Wow your ego is almost as big as metal bunnys haha

The legit ones are acceptable! I don't want the removal of the ctc. But a way to stop people who do things like this from doing it. And unfortunately just stopping an alt from trading on the same ip won't work. We will need to have a way for the logs to stay with the creature itself and to recognise going back to it's original owners ip. Yes raven. When you trade for a creature, you don't trade purely to sacceifice it later on, but for it's strength as a creature. Why sacc a creature with a crap load of tokens on it? You wouldn't unless you really had to. As for bending the rules but and everything dst, there will always be a dst out there. Lol

Extra thought... What if we remove the stat gains made fe saccing creatures that were traded? Marvolo you like how people abuse the use of alts? Just because the current game mechanics allow me to make ten alts load them with critters and then wait for them to age does not mean I should. Sure, go ahead make alts to rp by yourself with or for a change of pace from your main but don't allow them to trade inbetween.

First of all, I don't want alts to be banned. I don't want them openly accepted. I know of several games that track the ips of it's players and post them on a log so that they can be monitered. Trading on between accounts that have ever used the same ip should not be possible. What I suggest doing is placing one of these logs in md' if there isn't one already. So that people can't make an alt load it with trees and wait for the trees to max their age and trade them to their main foe insane boosts in ve. Doing such things is not right for those players who play ligitimily. Or those who use alts to put tokens on the creatures they want. If the removal of the acceptance of alts isn't allowed than a way to stop the trading of creatures between accounts needs to be forbidden. Ever since the ctc came out there have been massive ammounts of ve boosts. I am not a professional coder, but I do see something that needs to be adressed.

I have been long against the use of alts, in every game I have evr played. For me the use of an alt to advance your rp is like outsourcing jobs to another country. I firmly believe that if you need another character to play to help further your current characters rp than you're not looking hard enough at other peoples rp. The whole point of a mmorpg is to be able to rp with others in a sumiliar "world". I am sure that certain cases are acceptable but the large majority if alts are being misused whether to get tokens on certain creatures, to spy on another alliance, or to manipulate people to do your bidding, or to complete the same quest twice for the reward. This is why I am asking for the removal of the acceptance of alternate characters. To many times have I seen the abuse of alts to win the head contest or to flame another character. I am asking for the complete removal of alts, except for the use of rpcs. They are the only people out there that have the real need to use alts. As for things like the training grounds I know that mrd and other rpcs can take care of those alts.

It's fine, Mur. We understand your frustration, but trying to help her when she does not want to be helped does not help. If shencontinues on this path deal with her in a way that you feel suitable. And I can't wait to see what you write;) (and thanks haha)

Mur, I hate to be the one with enough testicular frotitude to say this, but this has gone on far to long. We all know what amoran did, how she did it, and what kind of person she is. But going on further only makes you look bad, and by association, md' as well. By publicly ostracizing amoran you are just following through with her plans( intentional or not) of discrediting you and md'.

Pm him the forum lol

What lib says is true. What we need first for something like this is an unknown player who investigates things. Perhaps like a switch or spell to thir account that temporary name change. So that they may investigate secretly, and hopefully unbiased. As for the rewards, I think drachorns need to be limited to a certain ammount per person. The remaining drachorns can be placed in this reward system.

Lol thanks dst

Factions

Ok after seeing the responses of those I respect I will edit to be more of a guideline than a rant. I admit that it was a rant and harsher than I could have made it, but isn't that what the hate page is for to express your dislikes? Anyways, my point is that it's not meant to offend you, but to actually male you think.

Watcher said it perfectly.