-
Images
-
Posts
1,396 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
20
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Downloads
Everything posted by Yrthilian
-
[quote name='Azull' timestamp='1325515508' post='99386'] I have stated repeatedly, in public and to you Yrth and Grido in private, that I personally have no hostile intentions towards Golemus what so ever. Also you yrth told me you requested the council to unban me (unless I misunderstood your pm to me) Grido told me he would unban me on new years day if I was still in jail by then. As of this moment I am still jailed. Now we know the council takes it's time with what they do that's fine. But Grido didn't even reply to my question why he didn't make good on his word. Aside from any issues about use or misuse of power. Is this diplomacy? Is this the integrity of a Golemus land leader? [/quote] As i said repeatedly you are necrovian. This is not me saying YOU are the bad guy i am saying the long standing rule is your allegiance to necrovian is what causes the issue. just because you didn't have the citizenship because of getting kicked from your alliance does not mean you are not seen as necrovian. it is a mechanic that make you not a citizen. It is a mechanic i asked to be changed but has never been done. again you say about diplomacy just speaking or as has been said many time declaring you are doing something in a different land without communication with all the land leaders is where the break down happened. Is this how you proceed with diplomacy?? send a deceleration and say i asked?? the main underlining issue is communication on all sides. ether way what has happened has happened. yes i did ask for you to be unban/unjailed as to why Grido did not keep to his word have you considered he was told not to?? i can not speak for him but that would be the first thing i would have thought to be the issue [quote name='Udgard' timestamp='1325520682' post='99392'] Huh? I thought there was a triumvirate or something? Just 3 person? So is the land leaders actually all alliance leaders? Including the person who invited someone who got jailed for accepting that alliance invitation? [/quote] they have the same stance as i do. or at least that was my understanding. the leaders of alliance run their alliances as they wish as long as it does not affect the land directly. players assume they know how the land is ruled. don't assume and speak with the alliances and stop trying to undermine something on the forum or if you "really want to know" make a separate topic on it and not high jack this one.
-
history tells of who is land leader. come on people the golemus civil war? so that in turn make ALL alliance leaders land leaders. simple. the only difference is the GG alliance where there are 3 members in charge. so from that i am sure you can all figure it out. Yes kiley has been nothing but polite and that is great.
-
[quote name='Kiley' timestamp='1325465447' post='99324'] Upon accepting the position as guild leader I was given full power over how the guild should be run and have acted accordingly. I do not have to go to the "land leaders" in regard to the decisions I make. I would also point out that at no time did any "land leaders" approach me about my choice to bring Azull into the guild. I woke to find him jailed and not even a pm in my box. The truly sad part behind all of this lies in the fact that Azull and I have worked many months to develop a level of trust and cooperation between lands traditionally divided. Months of work that has been washed down the drain by a rash act that lacked diplomacy and tact. I am more than disappointed in how this has been handled and would have hoped that yrth would have spoken with ME personally before jailing Azull. [/quote] First Kiley as a GG leader you of all players should know the land rules and know that a necrovian citizen is NOT allowed in Golemus. as a land leader you are also expected to know better and should have know your action had a much bigger issue that you say. It is very disappointing you decided by your self you know better how a land should accept a player into a land. The same could have been said that you should have contacted me or the other land leaders before letting a necrovian into Golemus you say land leader did not approach you and same in reverse. [quote name='Passant the Weak' timestamp='1325479029' post='99338'] Going slightly offtopic: I agree with Paracelcus. Beyond the retired king thingy, there is a very strange behaviour of Golemus as a land: they jail someone, because he was invited in a GG guild.... That attitude, puts a negative light to GG in my eyes. If they had an issue with him joining that guild.... well, couldn't they have him off the guild? [/quote] He was told by a citizen of Golemus that he may get jailed. ALL it take is to read the land rules to know that he was not acceptable as a citizen of Golemus So far only 1 player has been jailed that is not accepted as a citizen so your argument of the strange behaviour is mute as this is a single case of this happening. [quote name='lashtal' timestamp='1325503329' post='99366'] Since Yrthilian's position is somehow border-line, since the decision to jail Azull was taken accordingly to the "land leaders", since neither Yrth nor the "land leaders" spoke with Kiley (who is the Fusioneers leader)... I'd ask the "land leaders" to state clearly: 1 - who they are; 2 - why should other Golemians acknowledge their leadership (are they elected, chosen by the king, self-declared?); 3 - how do they relate with the king and the guild leaders; and most of all: how would they explain this lack of diplomacy towards the Fusioneers leader. [/quote] First how little you know before asking such questions tut tut tut it again is kiley is just as guilty for lack of diplomacy as you say. As a land leader you have the right to run your alliance as you wish but when it come to matter of the LAND you don't have the right to decided by yourself. it is that simple. answer to the above 1. read the forums and you would know who the leader are it has been mentioned many times by me and the others. stop being lazy 2. LOL again lazyness has failed you here too. read of the past and you will have your answers. 3. wow really you should actually read the forums. your lack of information is what blinds you to the happening of a land. the same as the lack of diplomacy from the Fusioneers leader. Look it is like this. Keily has the right to bring in members she feel FIT with the alliance. But it is also expect that she will not bring in someone into the land that is a know hostile it is also expect as a land leader and leader of the Guild that she will abide by the rules of the land (in this she has broken them) My action that i took was not as a king but as a player with the power and requested to do so. Yes there was a big breakdown in communication and from my point of view and from what i seen action was needed to be taken quickly. The jailing is just part of what the tool does. This is more an issue between Necrovian and Golemus from a diplomatic point of view. The issue of king.ex king is also mute. as per murs response. You know this whole issue would never have happened if one player had read and abide by the land rules.
-
As Grido said To best be able to help he would have to show his abilities and the best way to do that is by creating quests and scripting clickables but to gain access to the abilities he would have to play for a while and get the ability in the WP shop Or work with someone whom has the ability to edit clickables
-
So since most of you ignored what has already been said many times over. Re read Murs post as he says the people whom still had the tools could use them. even without that you have also ignored the fact that the decision to do what i did was not just mine. (action was taken with the backing of the land leaders) Yes the council need to post something and make a statement of what they feel should or should not be done. @Asull just because you lost your land citizenship does not mean you are not necrovian. That is like saying i was kick from Ireland so i am no longer Irish. the fact you had no citizenship does not take away from what people see you as and that is necrovian. Those asking about the citizenship rule go read the bloody rules they state no necrovian is allowed in Golemus. AGAIN you all ignore the retirement statement. I said i was resigning but will still take care of the land until a replacement is in place so new we wait for council to comment on this matter as mur already has but seems you do not listen.
-
well looks like someone is trying to cause issues beyond what they are AGAIN. So lets get down to it. 1. I announced i was stepping down but this would not happen until a replacement was in place. 2. My actions where taken not just of me making the decision. 3. The leader (be it ex or not) decided they would join Golemus WITH OUT checking with land leaders first. Just because i am not king does not mean i am not a land leader. 4. As you can see Azull was warned of possible jailing and still choose to stay in the alliance and still didn't communicate with land leaders. 5. I will admit i missed the announcement from mur on the use of the items. 6. a week went by for very good reason before taking action i was away on holidays 7. A week went by and Azull still choose to stay in the land without permission from ALL land leaders 8. Alliance leader Keily does not have over all say as to whom can become a land citizen and should have communicated to land leaders (this is a matter for the land leaders) I find it both annoying and frustrating that that so many assumptions are being made in this matter. As mentioned i took the actions after making sure land leaders where ok with this. I should not be explaining this to anyone out side of Golemus. The ones starting this sort of forum attack (yet again are making this personal) Know this. Be i a king or land leader or just a citizen i will take every action i can that i have the power to use and will stop necrovian citizens becoming a Golemus citizen. You made your choice. I have and always will be agents necrovian gaining Citizenship of the land i love and protect. this has always been how i am. I have on occasion let and even help necrovian around the land but because of recent activities and yes Peace you are one of them i will do everything to be sure Necrovians will be thrown out of Golemus. I know i cant do it 24/7 but i will do it when i am online. I though we had started to gain trust between the land and i was starting to allow necrovian citizens into Golemus but this action and the even it is part of show that trust is not something that can be had between Golemus and Necrovian if this is how they intend to do business between our lands. In regards to the kingship items. The are still in my possession while i type this reply As acting king until FINAL decision is made i will keep holding them. There is a way for Azull to get out of jail if the necrovian citizens choose to find it and use it so be it. AT lest then it is the land showing defence for their people something that is lacking a lot thies days. Now i am loosing track of the argument ans tire of this so read on and do as you wish. If MUR or the Council decide i should be punished AGAIN for defending my land so be it but i will keep defending it in every way i can. edit: just yo add i speak personally of the blocking of necrovians from Golemus If the land leader back me on this all the better i do not and will not speak on their behalf.
-
Interesting As G said why 700? There is a reason for the number it is. But instead of asking or even realising this you assume to ask this to be changed. It is better to think on something than ask for change (null)
-
How kings should have distributed rewards
Yrthilian replied to Muratus del Mur's topic in General Forum
no it certainly did not work 100% as planned but nothing ever does. some things work some dont that is just how it goes. -
How kings should have distributed rewards
Yrthilian replied to Muratus del Mur's topic in General Forum
Well like I said I won't speak on their part. But yes it was done. Also I never said it was about me but since I was one of the monarchs I have responded. Should I not have? -
How kings should have distributed rewards
Yrthilian replied to Muratus del Mur's topic in General Forum
who said that was not done?????? -
How kings should have handled "eon issue"
Yrthilian replied to Muratus del Mur's topic in General Forum
Actually the question was asked several times and stopped being asked because it was ignored for weeks as is often the case. -
How kings should have handled "eon issue"
Yrthilian replied to Muratus del Mur's topic in General Forum
Agin you say we assume. Agin you say we don't read. But the you do just that. As I said the chat was not casual in fact the reason YOU moved the kingship to the private location was to talk to us about that spell or at least that is what YOU said. I don't care who may be at fault. I already admit that I am partly at fault for failing in areas but you are quick to shift the blame or even the focuse of what the issues are. I don't care for the issues. In fact I used thinks in md and got punished for useing them so why would I bother useing more inventive way when you punish for it. When I am more awake I may respond better another time. With regard eon I helped with taking action after waiting to see what the public could do with the needle but you seem to say we should not have waited??? -
How kings should have distributed rewards
Yrthilian replied to Muratus del Mur's topic in General Forum
I don't speak of new things at all I speak of thinks already in md. gift box's, creatures coins so no I don't speak of new things. You say we wait on new thinks to be added. We wait on old things agreed if kings made the accounts them selfs it would have been a lot worse -
How kings should have distributed rewards
Yrthilian replied to Muratus del Mur's topic in General Forum
Again this was discussed with you and agreed we could have a treasury account to be created by you. Again another thing you didn't do. You also agreed to help us reward things other than wp's again nothing. Personally I gave away a drac or 2 from my own collection I also gave batches of wp's to citizens to use in quests. I would have also given items but felt that may be an abuse of that ability and not just for golemus but for all. I won't speak for the others but for me I got ignored when I made suggestions of in game ways to give rewards and how I would supply some of the different rewards but again no answere and yes I tried more than once -
How kings should have handled "eon issue"
Yrthilian replied to Muratus del Mur's topic in General Forum
I have not read all the stuff in here but mur your sample is flawed. I asked you details in chat about the spell and you would not answer. This was when you pulled the kings to a private location. I told you in chat what I thought the spell could be used for. You where suppose to give us the spell at that location but didn't give it a kept going on about other things. Since you ignored me and the other kings on that sell I figured you didn't want to bother with it. So in essence you are as much at fault here for asking us to talk with you and then ignoring us because you decided something else was more important. Remover you called the kings to the location and told us it was to give us the spell and to explain the tags system but didnt do it even when asked Sorry for bad spelling and formatting doing this from my iPhone -
Oh seems it may well be true how sad "King Slayer" ????
-
just started getting the same issue page not loading at all now
- 12 replies
-
- performance
- lag
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
ou are a good player and a honest citizen. you will be missed dear friend
-
Resignation letter of Yrthilian - King of Golemus
Yrthilian replied to Muratus del Mur's topic in Historic Documents
Well i would have preferd to have done this myself. I at least waited until i got a reply before i made it public. So yes i have decided i should step down as king. I have many reason some are personal and RL issues some are in game issues. As most of you know i have been on-line less and less this is for RL reasons more so than anything else. I also felt it best to step away from what i see is a big issue and lack of respect from comunity towards the kingship. Players like Eon whom have a complete disregard towards land rule and cannot be punished for it is what broke the camels back so to say. Yes i could have used a tool to hurt Eon and i do not speak of the needle. But I fear if i was to use it in the way i planed i would be punished again for it. But that is only a small matter. The position of King was to enforce land rules. when there becomes a lack of respect for the kingship the king cannot enforce anything without support. I had made request to have players punished for things they have done and they were not done or take too long to do that the community forgets about it to the point of the punishment being pointless. For now until the voting is done i will still act as king to keep things in order. I do not wish to get into arguments over who didn't do what or what could have been done by the king I just wish to step away while i can be considered a fair king before i do something drastic and damage my rep further Just to add I do NOT blame Mur for any of this. When i say lack of support yes Mur and council are part of it but the main support comes from the community so in turn i blame the community and myself for failing in this. -
moan moan moan I dont care dont you get that??? have fun with the moaning session.
-
LOL @ PIP suddenly you make your self the one who cares?????? who made you the police??? Look i dont care what you think or why you think it. Currently i dont care about much at all. As regards penalty point i aint gona care about that ether. I did what is within my given ablity to do. I made a decision that effected a tool that is on Golemus land. What you, Chewy (the almighty) or anyone else want to believe or not believe does not matter. To thoes saying the mighty taking the tool from the same place is agents the rule then the water dowsers are just as guilty for having multiple of the same bloody tool. How about this. I will make the tipical responce that is made towards any LR player or someone that brings other things to light. you are all just a bunch on moaners. Get over it. Making post about it apparently does not solve the stupid issue. PIP is just pip he like to create DRAMA just for the hell of it so i dont see this being a topic of any worth when he is involved. As regards me in game. You have not interacted with me in game to know anything that is going on. When it comes to the forum you ALL know by now when i state something official from me as KING i use a sig. Me as a player think you all need to get off the band wagon just for a small bit and learn to embrace things and not jump on the forums and have a bloody moan about things. It is no wonder MD is loosing players by the bucket load when there is nothing but a huge negativity and hatred within the realm. This topic to be honest is pointless. it is just another one of those moan moan moan and nothing ever gets done. Well with my little rant there it might as it seem to only take someone going on on of this stupid rant to get any notice or action. So lets see if little pippy gets his supposed way. But it wont matter as for one i wont give a (insert word not allowed to be used)
-
So now that someone has decided to manage a resource you all go crazy and complain. What happened when the memory stones got managed like that? oh nothing a small bit of neg repping and that was about it. Each land has their own rules to each land item and in regards to tool use. The Fusioneer's have the responsibility of managing Heat jar's. Before they got turned into public items the heat jars where used and managed by the fusioneers and that is what they are doing. Managing the tool. Personally i dont care about the announcement of the shared tool as it is a complete contradiction to the alliance role. again remember the tool was the alliances before a bunch more got created and put into shared status. So the fact that the fusioneers feel they have a right to manage such a tool is not unjustified. To answer to whom gave the permission for Mighty P to do as he has been doing. It was me and i stand by that. This is just a case of Mighty finding a loop hole to the rules that have not been plugged. He is not using an alt. The armours are not ALT's they are something else. They are not necessarily dead account's ether. This sort of thing has been done many times in the past and has always been abused. Just when someone has done it with a tool like this now you all complain. Why didn't you moan about the woodcutters and their abuse? and no i wont start bringing in more crap of prove this prove that. I have no care to do so. Until Mur make a set rule or implement what every he has planed i dont see the issue. Mighty has a system he has figured out and it is up to Mur to fix that if he so wishes. The only reason this is coming to light is that is has curved the greed a little and the greedy are upset by it. So it is like this. When Mur states it is 100% abuse and should not be done then Mighty may stop doing it that way. But if that is the case then nardolsk i think is it should stop taking all the water tools like he has been as that is a worse case of abuse. that what you lot are moaning about but you have done nothing to stop him or complain much about it. So if you are going to start picking on this sort of thing then bring every one into it that is abusing and not just the one guild or player. But all of them and i mean ALL of them. It is funny how you lot decided to gang up on one player until they give up and not bother others whom have been abusing the system for a much longer time. All this has come down to one thing farming what ever you can and abuse it all. To me all you lot are doing is making a mess of what should have been a wonderful system.
-
sorry i did not have access to forums from work Yes this refers to ALL lands. Golemus is a land of respect and the system is geared towards that respect of not depleting other lands of all their resources. The rule is based on the use of the item more so then the lands. The rule is that the item is not to be used to deplete the land resources. The laws of a land are still intact and i have not made a rule about the resources directly but on the use of the tool.
- 31 replies
-
- Tools
- Land Tools
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Added an update to the policy
- 31 replies
-
- Tools
- Land Tools
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
This is a warning to those that think it is ok to us GG tools to drain resources from a land area. I am looking into whom did it and who gave them the tool. Yes i will deal a punishment out to the citizen whom has been handing out the tools to a person that is draining the lands. You all know the policy no excuses what so ever.
- 31 replies
-
- Tools
- Land Tools
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with: