Chewett

I am inclined to remove it on a number of grounds and will disuse further with Mur. It would be interesting to see what the PC think.

This is acknowledged as a bug now, murry will fix it soon, so we dont need more people to confirm it thanks :)

Have a good birthday :)

I cant tell you because i cant remember. Nor will i be revealing the exact algorithms of what they relate to because its a spoiler, try experimenting and work it out.

Murry: [..] I will look at it then. Its good images load, that was main issue. [..] they will be fixed "soon" "... :)

Still not working - chewett - 22 sep - opera - fc19 --- also Trainer Red also is having this problem. Anyone else still have it broken?

when i say co-ordinates i mean, specifically on the image, i need to place the dots on the right locations, for each scene, if you want to do this i can send you the image and the specific details i need. ------ new post, probably going to be automerged Murs Response: i'll make it one day

The first, i did the whole of MDA inside and out, which took considerable amount of time, At the time when i was doing the other areas i didnt have enough time or knowledge about the exact positioning of the scenes. Grido sent me some information for which i am helpful but if someone wants to map it and give me x, y coordinates (contact me for further details) i can look at adding them since that will remove some of the time spent that others can help with, actually putting them on is still expensive in terms of time but will look to making some if someone can do the first. As for the other point, feel free to make an example, and we can look at properly annotating that. I will send Murry the thread for consideration on point 2.

As do i, not extreme.

i kinda agree.

Land Loyalty Required: Loreroot: 170 ------> you must have at least 170 days of loyalty in this land ... to grab the item Skills Required: No Other Skills Required ------> you need these skills to ... grab the item The action code, will probably be removed and changed to something that makes more sense. It doesnt make sense to expose the user to the raw db storage format. ---- i didnt see any other questions, please point them out if there were more :)

As usual, you appear to be mocking me... Please reread what i said "pretty bad form", Not purely "pretty bad", that additional word is a massive difference in the end. If i send someone a personal message, it is personal to them, not to post on the forum for all to see. If i wanted that then i would make a post. This topic has degraded. And i would suggest it be closed if Azull agrees.

>>Not going to do anything about this Chewett? Seems It was a part of a 'plan'. Where do i come in? What are you asking of me? Iv made it clear to azull that this is an individual acting without permission or seeking favour of MB. For Everyone: As a note, its pretty bad form to post personal messages on the forum.

Thanks nad!

Would have been fine if said people didnt include azull, apparently it did. Clearly i have caused confusion here, I thought copying and saying i agree with azull with it being roleplay, and just to "set the scene" would make it clear. Clearly not, so i wont post again here :)

Shush, the mods might wake up and see. As Azull put it, and i agree its "A bit of backdrop to support what happens ingame. A bit of posturing and rp. " And we all know rp != roleplay :P Edit: as a more serious answer: If there is roleplay purely occuring on the forum, then it makes ingame chat kinda pointless. However if its small and merely adding to ingame fun, then why not?

[ooc: I trust people understand this is roleplay (for me at least, azull might hate me :)) ) and not actual "i dislike azull" ect? If people are not grasping this (people referring to azull mainly, who im not sure atm) then im not going to post anything more on the topic here or anywhere. This is stuff that the AL and PAL should be. Its good.] I come to you Azull, I talked to you about what maebius was doing and you said it was fine. I made it clear that it was only him acting with kerberous, and again fine. But now you take your fight against innocents? How can i reason with you when you state that you wont stop any plans while discussing, and wont even stop them after if the result is not entirely to your liking?

repeat it.

Mur added it, make a new topic if you want to discuss it, like all changes. Not on a bug report.

Today Azull proved his worth, and was afraid to kill me. FS worked with Eon to try and kill Rheagar, they appeared to have failed. Come on Azull, Surely NC has more power than killing idle minions? Im at GoE, come kill or talk to me.

As is mine. I as king of MB offer you an alternative.

Its so much easier not to talk dst. Why do you think people dont? Are we not in a state where neither talks because its easier? Azull i am here, either talk to me, or kill me. It matters not which.

Spar was killed and left the game because of it. No "friends" came to help. ------- I made the post in the councils forum, to see what our public council has to say.

Since you have a shiny new forum why dont we use it. Previously the balance of killing and revival items were exactly equal meaning that it was possible to revive everyone killed. However possibility did not preclude greed, so this often didnt happen. Now with Mur increasing the ease the ease of killing people, but not of revival like he promised then surely we are going to end up with a large amount of people dead? Molquert exists yes, but that only just about balanced the greed of those holding revival items. In the past the death feature has been directly attributed to one player leaving, do we want more? What do you say public council? PS: for interest, i see Eon killing at the fastest rate he can with his new contract, and see little stopping.

Kill me first then if you are going to kill anyone, Show your conviction if you are going to blame people in my land.