November 30, 201213 yr comment_126917 There never was supposed to be an alliance, but Seigheart was adament about it and bam. I personally believe an alliance just causes more problems than not, what with take overs and whatever and needing necessary loyaty. Not only that, but some people may prefer to stay in their current alliance while having tk status as something of a side job for the community-- hint hint--. Kind of like being an Lho and remaining in your land. Report
November 30, 201213 yr comment_126924 No Princ. By politics, I mean the above board, legal type, rather than the back room deals and currying of favours that you seem to think I do. I mean acting in a certain way so that people are happy to communicate with you, rather than not because they think they might get some backlash of some sort. If the evil comment was in reference to what I put, I intentionally exaggerated it, didn't mean that you (or anyone else) had meant that. Miq, if you did not wish to vote for yourself, how does that encourage anyone else to? Indeed everyone should vote, and it makes sense (to me, at least) if you're going for a position that you would vote for yourself. Neno, I believe that goes back to Mur/Council wanting a single point of contact for TKs to make it easier for communication. I'd hope that the runner up(s) are invited to be a TK as well though. Report
December 1, 201213 yr comment_126956 I understood it as mocking of my post (the evil part), which is your right I guess, but wanted to point out that it wasn't properly mocked because I didn't base my argument on "Dst will corrupt Lightsage" but that Lightsage is someone who is "evil" (let's put it your way ) and that due to friendly environment all over the top, he'll be free to be himself much more than some others. Some believe in Lightsage, I don't, simply put. Report
December 2, 201213 yr Author comment_127055 Curiose, you're full of fertilizer if you think I was adamant about it. If anything I was a bit reluctant but Mud thought it was a good idea. Stop talking through that brown orafice of yours. Report
December 2, 201213 yr comment_127056 anatomically, I like to think it was pink. if it was brown, then something must be wrong. I say adamently because you suggested it, I denied your suggestion, and then bam. you get an alliance. reluctant or not, you git your wish, so congrats for that, but not only that, but because of the start of your reign, the tks have had their name scoured through mud and sand. bravo, very commendable. Report
December 2, 201213 yr comment_127062 [quote name='Curiose' timestamp='1354410802' post='127056'] abut because of the start of your reign, the tks have had their name scoured through mud and sand. [/quote] ....which is [b]exactly[/b] how it's supposed to be! Report
December 2, 201213 yr comment_127079 [quote name='Grido' timestamp='1354316572' post='126924'] Miq, if you did not wish to vote for yourself, how does that encourage anyone else to? Indeed everyone should vote, and it makes sense (to me, at least) if you're going for a position that you would vote for yourself. [/quote] In some cultures it's common courtesy not to vote for yourself (unless you're something like running for president). Report
December 2, 201213 yr comment_127114 writing a retort to you, dd, is far worse than arguing with conservatives that homosexuality isn't a sin. Report
December 2, 201213 yr Author comment_127116 I'd like a mod to clean up this topic, so that it can go back on track, instead of being derailed by silly accusations by a dysfunctional child and even more silly retorts. Edited December 2, 201213 yr by Seigheart Report
December 2, 201213 yr comment_127138 [quote name='Udgard' timestamp='1354436789' post='127079'] In some cultures it's common courtesy not to vote for yourself (unless you're something like running for president). [/quote] Aye, I would fully agree, that is not to say those people then vote for the opposition though, they would abstain from the voting. Report
December 3, 201213 yr comment_127182 Accusations? I do believe I have the PMs still, if I say so myself. Report
December 3, 201213 yr Root Admin comment_127203 [Redacted] Edited December 18, 201213 yr by Chewett Redacted Report
December 3, 201213 yr comment_127206 [quote name='Grido' timestamp='1354480887' post='127138'] Aye, I would fully agree, that is not to say those people then vote for the opposition though, they would abstain from the voting. [/quote] Well, my choices as ever are mine. But look at my choice like this: By abstaining i would give away all choice. So if i don't win, then abstaining just increases the chance that for me, an unfavorable person wins. Anyhow, since the council has veto and i'm by far the best choice, then i'm confident of my prevailment. Edited December 3, 201213 yr by Miq Report
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.