Shadowseeker

Okay, last check after I edited things: (I'm seeing this as finished but going to show for public approval once more before I hand it in to council in a few days) http://magicduel.cixx6.com/info.rules.html

And to think I missed this...shame on me. HBD. Belatedly.

Hmm...

I just modded this as requested, but my opinion on this: While it's fine to use personal resources, using an official position's (TK) reward stock is what like Curiose did at times, leaving a mixed reception overall. Thus while I fully endorse statements like: I will pay people out of my own pocket, etc; I think TK stock should not be used for a case like this, where conflicting interests obviously intersect.

[quote name='Pipstickz' timestamp='1345442379' post='120515'] It's also easy to forget, then you get unnecessary warnings. People would love that. [/quote] People would love to pretend to forget as well at times. But I'd rather have a bit more work when setting up a sale in here and in return get guaranteed satisfaction when I actually buy something.

[quote name='Pipstickz' timestamp='1345415224' post='120499'] I don't, this is the point of contention for me. I don't like the idea of people being punished for what the mods believe is an attempt, because you simply have to look at Fang to see where this could get messy. Therefore, I would suggest punishments and warnings stay out of it until it can be proven that somebody is actually trying to pull something, whether that's the actual crime or a second attempt. [/quote] We warn first typically anyways, so first offenders would be informed. If that happens more, with one party or another being unhappy about the change especially (we have no method and time to track the heat of every creat that is being sold for example normally), then there would be punishments. It's easy to remedy if every seller just adds a sentence saying these values may change, final confirmation before sale etc.

Happy Bifday.

We didn't discuss it, but as an option infraction points and a possible ban for the market section were named.

Us mods have discussed a possible new rule to be added to the market section, essentially stating that any screens/values given have to stay the same as they were unless they automatically increase (age) or a warning is given that it may change, for a final confirmation before sale. (e.g. you used a heated creature to fight and it may have more/less heat due to that, so when you sell it you have to tell the buyer beforehand) We are in agreement with this, but considering the forums are a platform for the trades, we wanted to know the public opinion. I have enabled a poll, leaving yes, no, something else as options. However, if you wish to elaborate on particulars, feel free to do so here. (If it turns into a discussion it will be moved into a new topic, so if you want to discuss only please save us time)

There is no definite understanding. There exists knowledge with a ? behind, one with a !. But what you call understanding is merely personalized knowledge, for understanding transcends knowledge for me. Break it down from the higher order into a form you can grasp.

HBD.

Congratulations indeed.

How do you measure an idea? One man will call it rubbish and toss it away, another will see it as a treasure and a third will wish to bury it deep in the earth. Especially for somehow research related alliances there can be no such thing as a clear goal. Though I will admit research seems to have moved towards a stalemate lately, I honestly wish we would get the clues that were promised since a long time ago.

HBD.

Since you say the GG drach is worth so much to you, may I know how much in GC exactly? It's hard to bid on something you have set no value on.

15gc.

As to avoid confusion, I would appreciate it if you would also edit your first post...while it is clear your sale again is after the edit, it looks confusing if people like to only watch the summary. Edit: 15g as a bid from me as well for it.

HBD.

HBD.

I have updated the first post with a link as to how the rulepage would look like after I edited it. (The council email picture would have to be changed and refit, however...I just put that in as a placeholder.) [If you can#t see it yet, that#s because I am uploading it now]

Happy Bday.

I think he used modifiers for the prices based on age and exp...he did say the prices will be rounded.

Attached are the path of lone and the lore manor. I even have the interior to show why it should be that (It's a library). I'll update this as I find more.

This is definitely a new idea and experimental..nice idea. May I still ask if you want the FULL ITC thing or just MDC to ITC? Also, how does it count if you have something of one ID, but then submit another ID, will both be added together? If yes, you might want to limit it to one ID per owner, making always the highest count be valid, until someone else claims the particular item ID, removing the entry of the other person.

If you still have been unable to find anything after continous bumps forever...might you perhaps just consider that BP's are [b]just worth more[/b]?