Chewett

Oh I can repeat that bug also :P

The sparring ground was a group that no longer really exists. That forum isnt appropiate. Post it in new ideas :)

Pick whatever section you want, the importance is getting the ideas down and discussed no?

Its actually an issue with flash :P And you once called yourself a bug researcher!

Someone: Hey I have a bug, MD looks like this: http://storenow.net/my/?f=0e9f9f048dea754798dc23c102e7088e Someone Avoiding work: Nope, looks fine, definitely a feature. Wont fix.

No one has a very good point. I get your points after re-reading this thread a couple times but its not really structured for me to have a proper look and decide if its a really good idea. Ideally you should be able to look at one part of an idea and its merits without having to bear in mind the entirety of it, its not really possible as you discuss the different ideas multiple times, slightly differently. I like some of the ideas, Will I be implementing any of them? No, because I cant form a coherent plan from this thread. It might give me some ideas for my own direction go to but this thread is too unstructured to get a good opinion. Personally I do think you need to make multiple topics.

Tad old but: http://magicduel.com/players/*chewett*

WPRC's didnt exist in RPC time FYI Grido :) If it doesnt work send me a forum PM and I will... adjust... it

I never saw any noticeable action from them so would deem it a group role and not significant. He is still doing the role although it's paused so I guess so

MRD grants to MRA, but MRD isnt around so change it to Murry.

In any issue cases or where the old person cannot be reached then Mur can award them

{ "title": "King of Marind Bell", "recipient": "Princ Rhaegar", "authorities": { "granting authority": "Muratus del Mur", "confirming authority": null } }, based on this, previous leader confirms, I should be confirming { "title": "King of Necrovion", "recipient": "Azull", "authorities": { "granting authority": "Muratus del Mur", "confirming authority": null } }, Same as above, Should probably be peace { "title": "King of Golemus Golemicarum", "recipient": "Grido", "authorities": { "granting authority": "Muratus del Mur", "confirming authority": null } }, Confirmed by Yrth as per above --- Per: http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/topic/15695-confirming-leader-tags/ these are valid. ---- also: { "title": "Leader of SoE", "recipient": "Chewett", "authorities": { "granting authority": "Muratus del Mur", "confirming authority": null } }, { "title": "Leader of SoE", "recipient": "Rheagar", "authorities": { "granting authority": "Chewett", "confirming authority": null } },

As a note can people not post links that expire because then posts lose content over time

There appears to be a duplicate time on the poll

I know but here they disagree http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/topic/15649-md-titles-updated-list-with-suggested-hierarchy/?p=154304

I propose that we make all leaders be confirmed by their predecessors rounded no bad things happened to make the previous leader not want to confirm. This would apply to kings and ally leaders

I am in discussion with Krioni, the reasoning is since we were testing giving them the ability to store unlimited heat.

Any protectors heat that is donated to the cause is _not_ counted FYI. Because they can keep large amounts of heat indefinitely. If any protectors did donate, I would suggest you contact me privately sooner than later, so you wont lose the heat in-between now and when I check and find out.

Common shaming tactics to make me feel bad? Thats wrong DD. I wont continue this with you on the forum publicly.

Sending me one link a week isnt data, data is normally organised. Present your data properly DD and the community can review it. If you want help with that I can tell you further in a PM. But I guess you are not going to bother because you dont care. I have told you why I refuse to make the decision, becuase I cant. Just because one person neg repped you twice, after they re-read the post is not someone going through 200 posts DD. You are using the Fallacy of Multiplication to try and "prove" your point, and it reduces it. You insult me by saying I havent taken time to understand you. You were the one that said I spent time doing this again and again and thats why you will always be my friend. But sadly that wasnt true as you turned against me as I didnt favour you in this case and just insulted me. That really hurt me DD as I told you but you didnt care.

Post the data, You just send me individual links and the majority of them I agree at you making a stupid comment DD.

You cant force everyone to take your viewpoint in how the reputation system should be used. Some will give neg/pos rep more easily than others and thats just how it works. Im not going to dictate how people have to use the system nor should you when suggesting fixes. If your fix is "well people should use the reputation system like this" then thats not a fix, thats imposing your ideas on others.

No, because they are not SS or KC...

SS not signing things follow the logic that the council cant sign things. If SS could, then surely council can also.

I wouldn't logically reason that. SS cant because they are an entity that has been played by a number of people, like MoC. Surely a well established alt will have one owner and therefore can have someone sign them. I dont consider the situations the same.