Chewett

I have removed my entries as they are lies. Please hold no credence from them, the emails or anything else.

You have publically stated that you do not consider my entries "right" Player Name to receive reward: Chewett Period of Trial: 14 March - 22 March Proof of Pain: magicduel.com/players/chewett I have not uploaded the images due to forum space, i trust this is a valid entry?

I have finished this quest. Why? Forum was getting spammed and i had to do something. I also have numerious things i need to use the forum for, for my role. Numerius has publically stated my entries arnt in the format and that i wont win... In conclusion, Mur and council have made it clear that the type of quest shouldnt be ran, let alone be given a WP for. about a quarter of entries are on my profile page, i didnt even waste my time uploading all the other stuff since Numerius wont count it.

I am participating in this silly quest. No forum work will be done until the end of the quest. Thats your pain

The quest is to leave the forum for a period of time?

no - because its stupid from a "collect as many X as possible " pov and greedy

no - because its stupid from a "collect as many X as possible " pov and greedy

no - its stupid to collect below the 66% limit because then you can collect less the next day.

yes - mostly, apart from tribunal due to visosity, but thats a general visc issue really. its just a pain to get through

yes - some lands are clearly unbalanced (as a side not im working with a number of players to balance out the shared item tools to make them fairer for all lands, there are big diferences between lands at the moment)

yes - there are not enough recipies to use them in

yes - avaliblity of tools limit avaliblity of resources

no - greedy GG people charge for things that should be free.

yes and no are mutually exclusive for this... its stupid having it as a selection. Similarly having it being a checkbox is foolish. yes - i wanted more skill and was bored.

Good news, council agreed on the option they were discussing. [quote] Ann. 2510 - [2013-03-11 17:01:58 - Stage 11] We have spent some time looking at the possible options and feel that the best solution is to offer everyone that lost access due to the bugfix the ability to "trade in" some of their wishpoints for the access again. This would involve removing something that they had originally purchased. This is to reflect the fact that people may value access to these locations more than things they later purchased. We are still very sorry that the fix had to be implemented, but want to try and ensure that as few people are affected by this as possible. If you lost access and wish to trade one or multiple of your Wishpoints for access, email us the following (copied from the used WP page) one or more times. Only those who lost access to the locations are able to do this. WP access: Beserkers Charge WP to remove: Playername of wish giver on date: Reason for WP: Used for: Locate spell 8 charges, regenerable [/quote]

[font=comic sans ms,cursive][color=#006400]1) Adepting shouldn't be taken that lightly. A person should adept someone who is [b]really[/b] his/her teacher. This, I humbly propose that once someone adepts a "master", this bond may not be removed without the master's approval (through some coding, ofc). This would not only make this kind of bond stronger and with more meaning (rather than just clicking of buttons to help someone) but it would allow new people to search and learn to be with a teacher. If you're an adept of someone, it should be a clear sign that another teacher should not interfere with the master's ways.[/color][/font] I would disagree one teacher shouldnt help someone else, specifically restricting yourself to one teacher could have adverse affects, like if a teacher tells you to join every land just to get land loyalty. If you talked to just them and they said it was ok, then you might think this behavior is the norm. There are many peolpe who dont have, nor will be learning any more in MD, who should they adept, no one? I see adept as being fluid and worshipper being strong. Worshipper works as you described, they cannot leave after they have done a lot of work with you. Just changing them to now being able to quit until they drop makes this better. Furthermore as i said above, voting via adepting someone else, would be a path along the way of leaving them, but reducing their adepts and making them more likely to fail. [font=comic sans ms,cursive][color=#006400]2) Reduce the number of adepts required to be Protector to 15, or even 10. The intention would be that people will now take adepting more seriously, and will think a great deal about choosing someone as their master. Thus, gaining adepts would not be that easy. And anyways, once the bond between an adept and master becomes strong, it would be difficult to maintain 20 other similar bonds. Almost impossible, actually.[/color][/font] This sounds like you just want to make it easier for people to upgrade their creatures... [font=comic sans ms,cursive][color=#006400]3) If the above two really do come into being, Protectors should really be equipped with [i]some proper things other than heals[/i] to make that bond stronger.[/color][/font] As i have mentioned before, discussions for improving protector powers turned into a mudfight with one previous protector screaming that she was being penalized and such. When i actually went to talk to protectors privately only one person actually gave good feedback. [font=comic sans ms,cursive][color=#006400]Edit: Also, adept days requirement would also have to be increased a bit again so that someone doesn't adept someone without knowing the bond.[/color][/font] [font=comic sans ms,cursive][color=#006400][b]It should help the adept more than the Protector. The adept should not do someone a favor by making him MP6 cause he is asking or wishing for it. Rather, the Protector should be the one who is working hard enough to devote himself so that the adept can learn.[/b][/color][/font] I see adept being on a path to worshipper. Essentually your idea but switching adept for protector with a couple changes.

I agree worshippers should do more than bug people to follow them. It would be nice to see some benifit from worshipping someone, from the POV of older players, instead of they can give you 20 vital energy. Demanding things and other such things would be cool, since we are "tied" to them until they fall, we can vote for them by adepting them or not, if they are mean and we want them to fall.

[quote name='Burns' timestamp='1363003011' post='133769'] Maybe i'm missing something important here, if so please enlighten me. Seeing that the WPs 'remember' what they were spent on, wouldn't it be possible to reset them point by point, technically? Obviously that's not a good idea for everything, like points spent on research points, locations or clickable access, and possibly also for the 'increase VE' thingies (not sure if they record how much that increase was at the time), but maybe it could be possible to the take wishes back that you spent on spells? For example, if i had spent a wish to get 4 guardian army, and decide that this spell just isn't worth it, i might want to take that wish back and spend it on something else instead, maybe another spell, maybe access to scripting, who knows. That could, for example, be implemented as shop feature somewhere deep down the extra features section, probably 3-5 uses per reset, and each credit spent allows you to, for the lack of better words, relocate a wish. [This might also help with complaints about spells that work in questionable ways, compared to their description.] [/quote] council have already asked me the technical viability of this when i was discussing the fix with them, to which my answer was yes it is possible.

[quote name='Tarquinus' timestamp='1362999448' post='133760'] There seems to be a disconnect because I honestly don't recall any WPs having been refunded, and now I am faced with the loss of access. I'll put it simply: this is not the end of the world to me. Tarq still has a spell to get in Oak Tower, and Necrovion is effectively closed to him at this point, so the loss of access of Berserker's Charge is no big deal. But it's discouraging, you know? I am very much in favor of limiting access to people and I applaud everything you, Chewett, have done. But I'd like to know if there is some way to trace what I spent my WPs on and verify that I did in fact spend "refunded" WPs without knowing I was doing so. If it's a pain in the ass, let it slide for now! This to me is [u]not that important[/u]. But there is a morale factor in it, and I know it has affected Amoran the same way it affected me. I'd just like to think there's some way it can eventually be sorted out. If I can help in any way, please let me know. [/quote] If you are sure that you once did buy the access, and now cannot get it, then it definately was reset and you spent the wishpoints on something else. I have modified the Current and past WP's page to detail what you have used them for. This should allow people to tally up what they spent.

see here: http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/topic/13848-beserkers-oak-tower-and-lr-back-entrence-key-fix-information/

First, before i start any of this, i will point out something. Im not paid to do what i do, i do it because i find coding and MD exceptionally fun. However there are always things that you have to do which aren't fun. I spent a good chunk of my time trying to find out how a very large number of accounts got access to a load of secret areas for no apparent reason. I have still not found it and still dont know what has happened. This is the same with the research since it is rendrils area and i did not code it. But it hasnt stopped me spending many hours on it. This is not fun. There was a choice, between letting many accounts have access to many scenes they shouldnt, or implemented the only fix possible, this one. I discussed with council as to how they wanted but they also did not know what else could have been done. I have also seen people be offensive towards me, personally, both on the forum and on email about the issue. This is also not fun. I have spent my time trying to fix issues ingame and you, MD, respond as you did? Makes me not want to do anything honestly, its sickening how you seem unable to respond nicely. But here i am still making this topic. The fix is bad, it should have been done by mur when he did it, but he probably didnt think of resetting access like this. He could not have known that some big key issue would occur. He did not do it to spite you, nor have i. Previously when you went up a mindpower you lost these keys. Mur originally just refunded all WP's used to buy them, then if you lost them when upgrading a mindpower you could rebuy them. This meant that those who didnt lose them gained a or three free wishpoints. This is why you didnt get refunded WP's now, because you already had been. [b]There are two options for this thread. Either we can discuss nicely the issue and possible solutions. Offer suggestions as to what can be done now and try and work towards another solution. Or you can be offensive, i shall close the thread, and not attempt to help anyone else regards to the issue. You can deal with council.[/b] [b]Your choice.[/b]

[quote name='Shadowseeker' timestamp='1362997426' post='133755'] Theoretically someone who bought the access after the refund now has the wish used in the shop could have lost access with this? Possibly, I don't know if it works that way or not. Easy way to check would just be to make sure everyone who has the wish used also has the key. [/quote] no. All those that hadnt bought the WP lost access.

[quote name='Nimrodel' timestamp='1362916241' post='133702'] I see the point chewett. And thats why I am asking you. Whom am I to blame for the mess I am in? [/quote] blame me, everyone else does. It appears to be the MD way to want to blame people nowadays.

[quote name='DARK DEMON' timestamp='1362912861' post='133698'] [font=comic sans ms,cursive][color=#006400]But I do have access... [/color][/font][font=comic sans ms,cursive][color=#006400] [/color][/font] [/quote] no you dont, try going in.

[quote name='DARK DEMON' timestamp='1362912656' post='133696'] [font=comic sans ms,cursive][color=#006400]I had asked Mur about my access to Tormented Souls without spending a wishpoint, which was apparently not possible cause my story mode was incomplete. He said I'd rather enjoy it for now cause he didn't have time to look into it.[/color][/font] [font=comic sans ms,cursive][color=#006400]Is my access now gone?[/color][/font] [/quote] if you did not buy access you will not have access.