Pipstickz

I would suggest keeping your record on the forum as well as privately. With that, you've got the extra copy in case one is lost, plus there's that much more discouragement to use the service for something that is against the rules, and it is easier to solve disagreements. I would also offer my services to keep track of stuff, if you don't want to, and if this actually takes off.

What's the difference between being nobody's adept and being a random inactive account's adept? Some words under your name.

I'd certainly like to see it changed. I assume it'd be simple enough to do, simpler than changing the whole format at least, and anyone who uses PMs regularly will benefit from it.

2 gold, 11 silver for the history

1 gold, 11 silver for the history How much will you pay for the Sharptear?

There is a mirror in MD, it's called "You don't have enough land loyalty to take this item". [url="http://storenow.net/my/?f=3966"]http://storenow.net/my/?f=3966[/url]

Syntropic dust, 1 silver

Happy birthday!

[quote name='Maebius' timestamp='1331890120' post='106711'] I think Pipz was commenting about the Apostrophe in "Don't" displaying as not being "Don\'t" [/quote] Yes, that was my intention, sorry. I tried Chewett's suggestion, and I understand now.

5 gold for the Fenths.

3 gold, 6 silver

Where would you suggest the baskets be put instead? How many uses is fair? How do you account for the person that uses the basket up knowing that it is back and therefore having a greater chance of getting it than others?

[quote][b]Chengmingz[/b] - [i]Don't go chasing after waterfalls.[/i][/quote] I'm not seeing it.

Two gold, six silver for the Fenths.

Two gold.

I knew what you meant by WP spells, but I do not see how it cheapens them. If anything, it adds value through giving spells more diverse applications. I believe the point of Ivorak's suggestion is that you add spells to your own item, rather than taking stones from others, so I don't see how you would take stones from people, unless I am still misunderstanding you. Heat could be dealt with in a similar way to the clickable mentioned here: [url="http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/topic/11715-we-want-them-back-declare-war-to-death/page__view__findpost__p__104537"]http://magicduel.inv...post__p__104537[/url], where heat can be raised through donations or your own efforts and stored in the clickable, or possibly through dedicated items such as a heat jar that can be linked to a clickable, and if there is not enough heat for a spell that is deemed necessary to the experience of a quest, the associated event can be changed to say "Insufficient heat, try again or donate to continue". I don't think it's unreasonable for quest creators to ask for heat donations, and I would personally be glad to help, if this is a feasible idea. Obviously there could be people who do things simply to mess with others, or out of spite, or whatever, but that can be dealt with through public opinion and awareness, or possibly the court: (From the WPShop description of Edit all clickables) [quote]Abuse of this feature by mistake or stupid use will get your feature _removed_, abuse by intention will get you _baned_.[/quote]

21 silver coins (or 1 gold, 6 silver) for the Fenths

No one, can you please explain your intended purpose or the point you wish to make with each post, and provide a link or reference to wherever you're quoting from?

How much VE did you have at the time? From WPShop description: [quote]Requires own vitality to be over 6k when cast...Its best if combined with a high personal maximum vitality.[/quote]

[quote name='Mya Celestia' timestamp='1331756334' post='106572'] [color=#008080][font=lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif]It isn't that I don't want anybody to have baskets. It's that a resource gathering tool is ranked at the same level as a toy in another land. It seems off balanced to me.[/font][/color] [/quote] Back when Mur asked people to submit herb suggestions, he stated that herbs were meant to be available to anybody (will attempt to find a link). Plus if baskets are given a Lorerootian loyalty restriction (I am assuming that is what you'd suggest, as they are located in Loreroot), then I would argue that tea cups, tea pots and tea recipe books should be given Tribunal loyalty restriction (I'm assuming that they do not have restrictions, but I have not actually checked), as they are located in the Tribunal. How useful does that make herbs if you don't have Tribunal citizenship/Tribunal friends? The common link between these items, and the reason they are unrestricted, is that they are meant to be available to anybody who shows up to grab them. The fact that the dice are "toys" doesn't make them less useful than herb baskets, either: they are just used differently. Dice can be used for quests, decisions, games, and most likely some other things that I'm too unimaginative to think of.

I believe No one is assuming that "Drafts" is similar to the in-game notebook while, as I understand it, it is actually meant to be used to store incomplete messages that have yet to be sent. Similar in design, but different in purpose.

Grido, can you please explain what you mean about WP spells a bit further? I'm not sure I completely understand.

You'd prefer to keep herb baskets to yourself and your fellow citizens, then? Or am I not understanding?

How many spells are there that have exceptions?

Do you even realize that your proposed spell is unfair? First scenario: You harvested an 8/8 resource down to 5/8, by accident, or just because it'll still regen 2 (or maybe even 3, I haven't actually tried). 5/8=62.5%, that's lower than 66%. You're on the list, you can't have tools. Second scenario: You find somebody depleting a resource, and decide to try to take some so as to keep it from them (perhaps not necessarily a good act, but it certainly cannot be said that this is bad). You just harvested a resource below 66%, you're on the list, you can't have tools. Third scenario: You harvest a 2/2 resource to 1/2. That's lower than 66%, you're on the list, you can't have tools.