Chewett

I personally dont care what my overall reputation is. Generally people who have more posts have more reputation. Although those are also people more involved in MD and such. e.g. me grido dst (from the top of my head) I dont see what the use is to display it really.

There is a limit, currently 50 i think.

We could change the reputation system to positive only Or make it not shown on profiles, or...

So you would entirely ban someone from the forum if you dont like their point of view? The problem is here is that I dont like the idea of myself, or someone else, arbitrarily deciding what is allowed or not. What will happen is each time I will ask the person and they will, from experiance, give a reason of "X's post is stupid becuase Y". At this point you either just accept thats their point of view or you tell them their point of view is wrong, not allowed, and warn them. We then reach Rophs point of "removing those giving rep's based on their viewpoint". This is what people dont do normally, or in all the cases im involved in they just go "well X doesnt like me". There has been recent cases where someone has just gone through the list of posts and neg rep them. We have dealt with that and that was simple to do as it was blatent. Also the person admitted doing it and explained why (because they were upset with the person). Im not saying thats a good reason (or one that will stop you getting punished) but they were honest and I respected that. An interesting point of view, Again what does it matter in all honesty? If we removed everyone that had a complaint against someone else, most of MD would vote me out. If you wanted to do that fine, but I know im very much hated by MD but I have one or two friends here still so I still play. We would effectively remove the community to 0 if we had to remove everyone that once made someone else uncomfortable and I would be the first to go. So if person Y says they are being annoyed by neg repping and person X gives a reason why its valid. What can you do? It all falls down to arbitrarily choosing no? As above :) ---- I forgot to mention in the original post, if people want to give feedback privately feel free to PM me.

I always get asked to "deal with" people who repeatedly neg rep others. However there is only one case that I can properly deal with. Where someone has deliberately gone back over a large number of posts in a period of minutes and neg repped someone. This is where I remove their ability to give reputation. If someone is just neg repping you a lot, what can I do? What do you expect me to do? They could just say they think your posts are bad and Its then not fair to go "I dont agree, I will remove your ability" What does the community think I should do in these cases?

So... You didnt follow the process? Like I asked you to DD... Did you have a look on the forum to see if it was reported?

I could be the postman.

Did you follow the process of talking to people?

Things change. I am letting people know with the above post :) See:

To explain my rep, and I think dsts. The last time you were a secretary there was a lot of mess that had to be cleaned up when you left if I remember correctly.

I asked him to post it here. it is a bug. Its not good behaviour.

Not entirely surprising when there has been 8 pages of this spam.

He was orange, he was not there. Did you save any of the errors DD? I dont see them here. Its a bug FYI. ------ So, to start with the comments. Dst shut up. More amusingly this time I actually mentioned this bug to you and you dont seem to remember it. Secondarily, thank you DD for posting this. For all others, I asked him to because I was pretty sure this was a bug. ------ Iv raised the issue before, its an issue because the login system is really poorly designed and the teleport spells sometimes cause an issue where a user has been moved but it appears they havent. Dont worry as there is nothing to abuse, Eon was moved but it just didnt appear in the scene.

Judges in these events should be anon so this is why he asked you to PM him.

After talking with DD he has stated he just wont post on the forum unless its really needed. He is not leaving the game :)

DD contacted me asking why I was hurt before his posts and I explained I do not hate him in any way. DD, you leaving "because of me" would hurt me more thinking I was the reason you left, Because I was hurt.

Moved to the new forum.

That hurts.

R.I.P. You were fun to work with.

The funny thing is Mur already has my address and has sent stuff to me (Although iv moved since then and dont send me stuff to the old address). Im playing devils advocate here, I don't necessarily agree dont want you to have my address, but I completely disagree with your high handed attitude and rudeness.

It was actually because you were put to confirm for everything. Not Murs doing I believe. Bitchy, I guess you missed the numerous posts where im suggesting changes... because you picked apart my posts, read one line you didnt like and complained. We _should_ be giving tags during this period Mur because I personally doubt this is going to be over soon. This is a perfect example and you have issued no edict to not give out any tags during this period. Just logged in and seen he has said so. Meh no one will get tags for months...

It doesnt matter Mur, you just dont get it. This is why Iv argued with you sometimes in the past, you just dont consider other peoples viewpoints when they are so different from yours. You dont think they are "real" or valid.

This is where question as to what "confirming" means, is this someone else who has the power to give/approve the role? or someone involved or? This is important in many of the cases, such as dst's above.

{ "title": "Freelance Artist", "recipient": "gonzalocsdf", "authorities": { "granting authority": "Muratus del Mur", // Murry as he would have approved and relates to other "confirming authority": "Mya" //proposed it } }, { "title": "Sky Scouter", // remove as group tag? - Yes, minor tag and a number have it. Can be added later "recipient": "AmberRune", "authorities": { "granting authority": "Muratus del Mur", "confirming authority": null } } -- Keep judge as its an important one ----- Ping me when you need to convert the JSON and remove the comments, I can help with that if you dont know how to Intrigue