dst

Did you at least know Khalazdad? If you did, do you know that he stopped playing about 4 years ago? Same with Daemon Toblabla for which another player opened a HBD thread. What's the point of opening such threads? There are better ways to spam the forum than this.

Amazing! I just saw the clip. I don't usually like kids too much but yours Maeb is amazing! He's so natural and fearless! Thank you for the quest, the prizes, the fun and the kid

Let's forget about Mur, let's forget about Council for a moment. The only "authority" left is Rumi. What if he simply doesn't like what you planted? Let's say you plant mint. But Rumi hates mint and he asks you to remove it. Will you keep complaining? Don't forget: it's his project, he makes the rules, he takes the decisions. My [b][u]personal opinion[/u][/b] is that you choose that "culture" because you wanted to create a bit of fuss. Well you managed. Congratz! Now, move on.

Few things you can try: -get latest flash -clear cookies and cache -use another browser and see if you have the same issue

Attach a print screen please.

We're all going to die Well wookie...leave damn UK and move to RO. I can't guarantee you'll have food and shelter but you'll always have internet!

Thank you all for the wishes. It's my 5th anniversary in MD . I never thought I would last THIS long.

If he wants to run the ally by himself then he doesn't need an ally and TK should be disbanded. The purpose of an ally/guild/whatever is to gather people with the same objective under the same roof. Besides, the idea was tested in the past and failed badly (see all the complaints towards TKs and crass inefficiency that was governing).

GG sold. If you want spell stones, you know how to find me. Don't make idiotic offers for the spells. Mods, please close this. Thank you.

Define abuse. And how can you minimize the "death" effect? Any change towards that way will simply change the death to something else: death attempt, murder attempt etc. It's unfair to this mechanism to nerf it just because we see it as a "negative" thingy. I see bad RP as a negative thingy but I never asked for it to be "nerfed" (oh well...I tried but god knows those bad RP-ers are worse than <insert the worst thing you can think of> ). If you apply such change to death then apply it to ALL existing spells/items/actions.

Why sorry? It's his decision. It's what makes him happy. We should be happy for him. He's doing what he wants.

[quote] [color="#CCCCCC"]Ann. 2368 - [2012-08-07 02:24:14 - Stage 11][/color] The head of the Treasure Keepers is starting to smell. We can't stand it anymore. We have called in a specialist to fix this but some strong-hearted adventurers need to go and find this specialist. His name is Molquert, and Molquert will now appear whenever anyone in the realm dies. The problem is Molquert never does anything for free. Beware, he cannot hear anyone from the land of the living unless they have defeated both of his guards so first find them, declare your intentions and they will attack you. Defeat them, then you need to find Molquert. Do not try to trick Molquert, his guards will be keeping him informed and trying to trick him could end very badly for you... [color=#b22222][u][b]This is the first stage in the implementation of a new revival process.[/b][/u][/color] Good Luck! [/quote] So let's wait and see. Why change something that's not even finished yet?

Buhuhu. Players are getting killed. There are several ways to resurrect them but we are too lazy to apply them. What do we do? We try to change the system. If you think that way why not have also the revival spell/item/whatever backfire? As in it can also not work. Or spells. Or fights. Or broken minds.

[quote name='Pipstickz' timestamp='1347889323' post='121948'] As for Elus, I doubt something that changes inventory of its own will would be implemented unless it couldn't be traded normally, therefore stopping unsuspecting people from buying them and losing them the next day. [/quote] Actually...that is the purpose of Elu...It is implemented but it's not active.

[quote name='Etluc' timestamp='1347726706' post='121817'] There is a way to make it snow any time of year - not including the spell. [/quote] Nobody said anything about the spell. Besides, the spell does nothing. Only shows a nice pic on the trigger box.

We have that...for snow...during winter.

[quote]why should everyone even try to reach the impossible aim?[/quote] That's the point: it is not "impossible". It is achievable (and you can't deny that) BUT not by your everyday noob. Or at least not THAT easy as some want. [quote]Like in the hints it says eyeryone can win against every ritual - as I know even this is no longer true[/quote] Actually this is still true. Every rit has a counter. The problem here are the personal stats. Mur never ever thought that someone could reach 1M attack so I am pretty sure he never took into account that factor. But if you remove the stats, you can beat ANY ritual using another one.

Not to mention that mp6 is not complete yet. Things should change. At least according to Mur's last feedback regarding the situation.

[quote name='DARK DEMON' timestamp='1346774677' post='121438'] WHAT reasons? I would like to know [/quote] Few reasons (some that I have already stated): -inter mind power fights (see the example you have been given twice already about wars) -joining an ally gets you stats and as I explained, in the past 100 attack was a loot (and now land loyalty) -joining an ally gets you prestige especially if you're an mp4 (in the past mp3 as well). In the past if an mp3 was in an ally that person had already an advantage from the point of view of popularity+ again stats -almost everything in MD has 2 "faces" - mp4s being attack by mp5s is one of them [quote name='DARK DEMON' timestamp='1346774677' post='121438'] And when this was implemented, was it believed that MP4's WOULD join alliances? If it was, then the exact opposite is happening... [/quote] When it was implemented even mp3s were allowed to join. And they did. [quote name='DARK DEMON' timestamp='1346774677' post='121438'] My core point: If you're repeatedly saying that I should advance to MP5 if I wanna join an alliance, then why is the option to join one available at MP4 in the first place? [/quote] Why is there an option to buy spells from WP shop when you're an mp3 and you don't have heat to cast them? Btw: this is the last time I reply to your first question because right now it seems that you don't wish to understant or you're simply tring to piss me off.

DD, it seems you didn't understand a word I said. Alliances don't need to be changed in the direction you suggest. They were made this way for few reasons. The ONLY disadvantage a person that joins an ally is that if that person is mp4, he/she can be attacked by mp5s (and mp6es). But there are countless advantages to joining an ally. Why do you wish to take that "disadvantage" away? If you don't like it, I repeat, don't get into one or move to mp5.

By joining an ally, you get stats (I agree, right now they are not much but in the past 100 attack was a looot -besides, the amount can be easily changed and maybe it will be changed in the future). By getting stats, you should be stronger than a normal mp4 so you should be able to play in the big league. Also, why should you stay mp4? Advance. That is why mp5 exists. Joining an ally is optional. If you wish to be in one, you take it as it is: with advantages and disadvantages.

[quote name='Menhir' timestamp='1346758525' post='121409'] @Eon could you tell us the hight of the herbalism stat when it started to double please? Kind regards Menhir [/quote] That is a spoiler. And that is the reason Alyon's post was hidden (Eon edited his).

[quote name='Fang Archbane' timestamp='1346712230' post='121395'] I think Seigheart should live for a couple of reasons. 1) hes my Boss, and i need the head of the Treasure Keepers to run my job smoothly. 2) hes my friend, and seeing him incapacitated hurts me. 3) the community needs him, whether they like to admit it or not. hes an important part to Quest Hosting, and Mur trusts him, so the community should to (or at least thats my honest opinion) [/quote] 1) Subjective reason. I, as a normal player, don't care if your internal system is so badly defined that you can't work without your boss. 2) Subjective reason. I can't care less who your friends are or what they do especially if they are not my friends. 3) Incorrect. The community doesn't need TKs. It was just one of Mur's crazy ideas. I haven't seen any improvement in quests creation since TKs were formed. Even more, I've seen more stress and arguments since they were formed because TKs can't do their job good (even when fenrir was alive). Players used to do quests and sponsor them from their own pockets. Today it's the same: if a player wants to start a quest he/she must be sure he/she can provide a reward (even if it's just few silver coins) because he/she has no guarantee that TKs will sponsor his/her quest. So bottom line: stop the bs with "I can't do my job cause I am dead". You were unable to do your job even when you were alive. Why? Cause you're incompetent. Have a nice day!

The viscosity will NOT be thrown to the garbage can so the only option we have right now it to try and nerf it or re-configure it. So I suggest instead of whining, to come up with a solution. The new tutorial should not affect character that have already pass it. Why would it?

Or maybe noobs under 30 days (or 42 ) can ignore viscosity and after that day, the visc will gradually increase.