Chewett

fixed.

Ok thanks :)

Got any references? If im going to fix it I need to know what its meant to do. I wasnt aware anyone specified how things were meant to work. If its meant to allow collecting after a period of time, it shouldnt do what rophs is showing. If its not meant to allow collecting many after a period of time then it should only give one. Personally, I think it is meant to allow you to wait, use lots, then collect many, because thats what the elu does, and its the same system, but am welcome to be proven wrong by announcements or some Murpost I havent seen. Thanks :)

I would consider this a bug, why do you consider it normal behavior?

Not really, Its quite common knowledge FYI. And its even more common to mp3's spells, and tell them how to do it. I dont even think its considered a spoiler.

Some points that Im surprised to not have read: In case people didnt know, the "death" system is actually merely using the way that someone is killed in the torch contest. It was designed to be short term and resolved quickly and automatically. Currently, any modification to how death works in MD, also affects how it works in the TC. Although since we dont run this atm it doesnt matter too much. But please remember that until someone decouples one from the other, the more the "death" system changes, the more that TC will need to be re-fixed later. After the death items were given out, and became more popular, council saw people who died, and no one cared to help them be revived with big ceremonies, etc. Therefore a plan was devised, and that plan was Molly and their guards. Molly has worked really well (and hard) and is another one of councils legacies of planning and implemention (Which, im sure you are bored of this, but im going to keep telling you guys that council were amazing, they got it organised and such and required minimal coding to get it working) Molly was, and still is, the less public way of getting revived. Interestingly enough, people have forgotten the times when people arranged ceremonies to revive the dead, etc, and apparently consider Molly a community way to revive someone, and not something a couple friends can do. This is essentially my point of view on adding large amount of dead only content. This is the reason that previously Mac computers dont have viruses, because virus writers dont want to target a very small portion of the market, when you can target a massive section (aka widows users). And, to keep on this line, if the people dead at any one time rises (like the Mac users have now risen a fraction) we perhaps could look into making it even more immersive. And again, note I said large. That being said, this is only my point of view, and its quite feasible that Mur or anyone else who has the power to might decide to code large amounts of things. Some of the ideas are interesting and will certainly be considered, In a couple months when I will have a decent chunk of time I will definitely re-read this topic.

There is some issue with keys being given to people randomly, This started to occur on Murs account via fighting and he apparently fixed this but there is still some bug where keys are transferred... Its an ongoing issue.

This has already been discussed and planned by I and the Art team FYI. Please ensure people talk to the right people, before doing things like this and raising concerns.

All sent out except to: Asthir anonymous letter Who I couldnt directly find forum accounts for, please contact me. One entry was refused, as I didnt consider a newly purchased tree a valid secret santa. Thanks to Rophs for doing a large amount of co-ordination.

Tom left the game a while ago, it will likely have been disabled or similar.

Half of the santa'ing is done, I will finish the rest tomorrow due to having to deal with some issues IRL. Apologies.

I have everything now, pimped some rewards, just need to shuffle them around and send them out. This will happen later today provided IRL stuff settles down by tonight.

DD has read what I have to say, I hope he understands.

Leaving now validates everyone who you tried to prove wrong, and destroys everything you once did. Your two things that kept you here. 1) Those people are still your friends. 2) That person you lost hope in, gained a lot more respect for you over the past month. You are throwing away both of these and doing the most stupid thing you have ever done in MD.

As a note, I left early, so didnt really witness much at the end apart from guessing people said no.

DD wanted a revival via a molly voting, we had speechs and such. Most people said he needs to learnt how to deal with people and be social before he is revived. I was espically vocal about how someone will kill him, very soon again, if he is to be revived so there is no point being revived without changing his attitude. DD claimed that I was the only person that could change him, despite telling me in private this is the new him and he wont change. He then told the public that staying dead will change nothing. Then people voted no to keep him dead rather than revive him.

Enough said. Emailed you too.

The problem with MD (as I said in chat) is that many people have a similar thoughts, and sometimes feel it necessary to "agree" with others and overstate the point. This can come down to more serious cases on the forum where large swathes of negativity are introduced due to the masses disagreeing with someone, and it going on a downward spiral.

You had -1 You gained 5 You now have 4

The point was, many people use many different types of screens, sometimes I have a 1024 x 768 and ideally, that shouldnt matter in their experiance with MD.

This is planned and part of it has actually been coded :)

As a note, that sounds like an exceptionally large screen, from the comments about writing size, based on its DPI.

I am concerned this will end up as prices becoming "de facto" from people who have things to gain from it. E.g. a lot of these prices are drastically wrong. Also, can you put a basic credit trade value at the top and just show the units in GC. This will be easier.

Nutcracker: 3gc/$40 Santa: 4gc/$20 so 3gc = $40 but 4gc = $20?

So as not to mislead people, can you give references for all of your prices? I was not aware Anniversiary aramors have been sold recently, and I feel they are sorely undervalued, noting that there are only 70 in the game of the 7th ones, for example.