Chewett

As a Note: This is considered poor form and it has generally been agreed that your bid remains true until someone else outbids you or the auctioneer accepts your cancellation :)

Internet is vroken

Im an hour late, where is everyone?

A general point to bear in mind for future tags and this one: Its MagicDuel or Magicduel. I prefere MagicDuel, but its not two words. Also, Personally I wouldnt put negative comments on the titles, using the word pestering seems negative, and I dont like that in a title document. To the tag, Changes I would make or consider suggesting: >>Awarded this title for his dedication to his role as [a or the] Guardian of Bob. Fits better adding this. >>Through his ongoing persistence and pestering, I wouldnt have pestering as above. >>Throughout time past, his dedication did not waver, even with the promise of fame and status. Too many commas. A general rule is that if you have a sentence in three parts (separated by two commas) the middle section should be able to be removed and still make sense. So I would change this to either: A) Throughout time past[removal of comma] his dedication did not waver, even with the promise of fame and status. B) Throughout time past, even with the promise of fame and status, his dedication did not waver. (middle can be removed and sentence makes sense) --- The other bits seem fine

>>This title is the epitome of the root role of a guardian, and further proof that grand deeds are not always required to show ones dedication, simply being there are just as important. That last section doesnt seem to flow properly. I would rewrite it by adding in: This title is the epitome of the root role of a guardian, and further proof that grand deeds are not always required to show ones dedication, deeds such as simply being there are just as important.

I agree, Sunfire should.

As a seperate issue, can you send me the details of the incorrect token descriptions so I can change it please, thanks :)

Its a problem with the machine and not the game.

Oh I can repeat that bug also :P

The sparring ground was a group that no longer really exists. That forum isnt appropiate. Post it in new ideas :)

Pick whatever section you want, the importance is getting the ideas down and discussed no?

Its actually an issue with flash :P And you once called yourself a bug researcher!

Someone: Hey I have a bug, MD looks like this: http://storenow.net/my/?f=0e9f9f048dea754798dc23c102e7088e Someone Avoiding work: Nope, looks fine, definitely a feature. Wont fix.

No one has a very good point. I get your points after re-reading this thread a couple times but its not really structured for me to have a proper look and decide if its a really good idea. Ideally you should be able to look at one part of an idea and its merits without having to bear in mind the entirety of it, its not really possible as you discuss the different ideas multiple times, slightly differently. I like some of the ideas, Will I be implementing any of them? No, because I cant form a coherent plan from this thread. It might give me some ideas for my own direction go to but this thread is too unstructured to get a good opinion. Personally I do think you need to make multiple topics.

Tad old but: http://magicduel.com/players/*chewett*

WPRC's didnt exist in RPC time FYI Grido :) If it doesnt work send me a forum PM and I will... adjust... it

I never saw any noticeable action from them so would deem it a group role and not significant. He is still doing the role although it's paused so I guess so

MRD grants to MRA, but MRD isnt around so change it to Murry.

In any issue cases or where the old person cannot be reached then Mur can award them

{ "title": "King of Marind Bell", "recipient": "Princ Rhaegar", "authorities": { "granting authority": "Muratus del Mur", "confirming authority": null } }, based on this, previous leader confirms, I should be confirming { "title": "King of Necrovion", "recipient": "Azull", "authorities": { "granting authority": "Muratus del Mur", "confirming authority": null } }, Same as above, Should probably be peace { "title": "King of Golemus Golemicarum", "recipient": "Grido", "authorities": { "granting authority": "Muratus del Mur", "confirming authority": null } }, Confirmed by Yrth as per above --- Per: http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/topic/15695-confirming-leader-tags/ these are valid. ---- also: { "title": "Leader of SoE", "recipient": "Chewett", "authorities": { "granting authority": "Muratus del Mur", "confirming authority": null } }, { "title": "Leader of SoE", "recipient": "Rheagar", "authorities": { "granting authority": "Chewett", "confirming authority": null } },

As a note can people not post links that expire because then posts lose content over time

There appears to be a duplicate time on the poll

I know but here they disagree http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/topic/15649-md-titles-updated-list-with-suggested-hierarchy/?p=154304

I propose that we make all leaders be confirmed by their predecessors rounded no bad things happened to make the previous leader not want to confirm. This would apply to kings and ally leaders

I am in discussion with Krioni, the reasoning is since we were testing giving them the ability to store unlimited heat.