Chewett

Why LR? Why now?

No they wont. You can ignore them but they wont be deleted provided they do not break the rules of the forum. Shem has a good point, If you ignore hard/other questions from other people then surely you are trying to hide things from your potential land members?

When suggesting titles, It would be good to see why you think you are their authority. So far I dont see Peace as an authority on Bob or no mans land. Nim moreso with her GG nominations but again with dst, what is authority? I dont see myself an authority on much really So I dont really think I shall nominate anyone. Nims Tags: Drach Overlord - Is this a permanent one? RJ came and went as drach master, Is this what you are thinking Mur as a permanent one? LHO Overlord - Same as above. I agree with their prominence but feel perhaps a different title is needed. Also burns hasnt really been doing his job as long as grido, So why same tags? Knight of the MR's - Yes this seems to fit more, MRalyon will always be a MR knight kitty in the dark - Seems a silly title, I would nominate her for much more personally but dont feel its my authority. --- I think it would help for you to give an example of a good title Mur, or say which of the above are good or not. Also telling us what authority you think we are under would be helpful, You have named an odd collection of people.

Two Kings? Which two kings? Two roles as decided by the system as "kings" as discussed between us?

Get more talented and then you might be able to multicast. For now you are at a level at which you cannot cast two spells at once.

The current system seems to work better in actuality then you never actually assign one person as leader of this group with no leaders. Giving any one person power to decide roles in no mans lands essentially puts them on a king status. Letting Council and Mur give these tags out makes it much fairer. Also please dont append that message to the bottom of every posts, we get the idea you dont care for MD.

The discussion formed that, Having a visual representation of strength and not permitting lower mindpowers to attack the really really strong people without being informed of what they can do and such was considered.

They have become that recently, but they were never intended to be this.

Those were points dark also raised ingame while we were discussing that. Hence why its in the discussion phase still.

Getting balance isnt hard if you have the time to invest. You dont even need to know how to fight if you talk with friends and get help. This essentially just removes the restriction completely. This isnt a compromise it just means people are stuck with their creatures once advanced. You had some rather foolish players lead you if you were told that :P There is discussion amoung Mur and I to permit MP3's to attack anyone. Keep an eye on the announcements to see if this gets implemented :)

Here I publically apologise for calling the first post trolling. Ackshan explained his point more clearly here, and now we can all discuss it rather than it being a spammish comment that looks like he thinks RPC's are still around. I disagree entirely here. They were removed becuase the structure didnt work. Why remake an organisation that didnt work? I am considering remaking the RPC structure but I most definately will not be remaking it like it was. Your tense structure is plainly wrong also. Its what they did, not do. I did call it out? Unsure what you mean here. Agreed here Rophs, And for information all RPC's were demoted, the WP list is coded badly so it only updates the names when the person gets a WP. Grido last got a WP back in the days he was RPC. This stands for all those who have odd/wrong playernames.

I was CC'ed into a number of emails concerning this item, Peace was requested to post that the reason she did not get the item made at the time because she was requred to send the description and it was never sent in, She did not post this on the forum so I was asked to do so EDIT: Apparently she edited it, But this didnt bump the topic so im leaving it here.

From what I read, he is giving you gold coins, not silver. So that indeed makes him a "profit" Actually this isnt really a new thing, Its been done for years really, when people want gold fast, people sell it to them for 16 silver.

Unless im very much mistaken, you are trolling this again. Further trolling and I will have to ban you from any of my development/discussion posts again Ackshan. It gets very old becuase you do this to nearly everything. Surely option 2 is very likely to lead to option one just due to the vast differences in population of the main lands and other lands?

QR CODES

That is essentially the second proposal, Just be creating a number of non PC groups, like nims new role. Unless you are suggesting they need to be in a PC like group in some way?

Indeed have a good birthday Poe :) Come play MD again one day.

Not really, there were a number of key differences between PC and council, the primary one being how they are chosen.

It "could" work more fluidly with two. I didnt say it did.

Re-organising twitter/facebook is something on my todo list. I will contact you.

Yes, I said this to them repeatedly about the meetings being too long but they always ran on. I was attempting to get them to follow a meeting format, agenda and such, and a couple of the times i pushed/ran it myself to ensure it stayed to time, but I really didnt have time to do that each week, and like most meetings with people not used to holding them, they get caught on little things. Thats essentially what i was trying to do. Im not sure what you mean here. This would be great, Ideally just to ensure that it stays in a nice meeting format. Although During the meetings they would be asking me questions, But if it was nicely agendaed and had a good chair that could work.

Its still around, I have the login details for it all and was organising some things until I realised i really didnt have time.

Why with a PC? Why not any number of other ways?

This is a good idea. See Public/Private Key infrastructure Murry, Look up how X.509 certificates work. I can look into throwing something together if you want. Public key, everyone can decrypt the code to prove its real, only you can encrypt it and generate the serial number.

Two more? In a specific category? The idea of having 4 was to ensure that no vote would be "won" by two people siding on one side. It means things are thought through more rather than two people just steamrolling things.