Jump to content

Yoshi

Member
  • Posts

    382
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Yoshi

  1. [quote name='cutler121' date='01 March 2010 - 07:42 AM' timestamp='1267447338' post='55555'] The main difference within level is how quickly the water refills and changes for each lure at different types of fishing locations from more quickly to more slowly. [/quote] Oh GOOD! The water refilling is quite annoying to say the least.
  2. Happpy birthday to youu, Bob doesn't like youuu, don't worry be happyyyy, cause today you turn 2! Seriously though, Happy birthday
  3. Will certain lures catch certain fish better, or only certain type of fish per lure?
  4. [quote name='Jester' date='28 February 2010 - 05:45 PM' timestamp='1267397146' post='55515'] In the first case, B could be not responding because A's argument is irrefutable, not because it is childish. This format you used for the argument confuses me, however. B has the strongest position of being able to refute A's arguments each time, and he gets to end. It would appear to be more fair if A would have a chance to counter B's arguments. [/quote] I don't think A and B is the same person or group/party in each question.
  5. Yoshi

    Lottery

    What is the number range? 1 - 10 for all 4 numbers, no repeats? Also, just have to have one trustworthy person to use something like: http://www.random.org/quick-pick/?tickets=1&lottery=4x10.0x0 (I set it up using the URL to pick 4 numbers up to a value of 10, with no repeating integers) The person just has to click it once, screen cap it, then post it.
  6. [quote name='Kafuuka' date='28 February 2010 - 07:56 AM' timestamp='1267361811' post='55476'] Debates have always been a part of MD and I thought it was once again time to talk about argumentation. Suppose you have two people (or groups of people) A and B who are each supporting one thesis. In the following examples, who do you think is 'winning', if any? 1. A gives 1 argument and B does nothing. 2. A gives 2 arguments and B gives 1. 3. A gives 2 arguments and B refutes one. 4. A gives 2 arguments and B refutes both. 5. A gives 2 arguments and B refutes both and gives 1 argument of his own. Feel free to ponder why exactly I'm asking this. [/quote] 1. A is "winning" because B cannot counteract said point whether it being perfectly valid, or just something that is beyond B's understanding/knowledge. 2. This would depend on the arguments used, wherein B could have used a more valid argument, while A's arguments were more just BS. Either could be "winning". 3. A is "winning" because even though B is able to refute one argument, he is back to 1. because it might be beyond B's understanding/knowledge. 4. Neither is winning and they are both at a stalemate. B might be ahead by a bit because the way I see it, if he was able to shoot down the arguments of A, then B is being more successful. How long that will last however is deemed uncertain. 5. This would be the better outcome to 4 (in B's case anyways), and B would be "winning" at this point due to B shutting down A's arguments, and making a claim/argument of his own to which A has to respond to. Now, this is purely on a "as far I see it" plane of thought, and winning to me would be successfully counteracting the opponent, and making valid claims of your own that your opponent cannot refute. As for another way of looking at it, debates are usually beneficial to both parties, by the fact that it allows the other party to see the topic in another Point of View, and it allows for constant exchanging of knowledge. Eg. If you get defeated in a debate, you have won, if you now use the opportunity to research further, so you can debate it further next time, and then have an arsenal of facts against that certain top, knowing that if they use an argument, you now have a defense against it. Or, you might even see that your point of view was not as correct as you might have thought, and you might go to the other side. In which case, the side that successfully "converted you" would be seen as the winner, but you are also, since you now are more content on the side you are now on. I would really love to hear your thoughts on this. I love debates
  7. Due to their area, Chile was extremely prepared for it as unlike Haiti. My prayers are still going out to everyone affected by this current string of natural disasters.
  8. Uhhh not sure if I should do this, but I'm going to hijack this thread. I got this just now. along with others at the Sparring Grounds... Error: SyntaxError Err description: undefined Err number: undefined Err message: illegal character Ajax response: ���ϪF�?��&���G@�{��(( �+�|1��0 ��}��Ow�i�ͽ��Ո!q3�r����Ż4�}� Ux�U2�� �$@ -���,�/>D�O[%A�k�÷�|��QAҟ�����3�@��^GE ��°��# =�\��{�2�KȮUzy��_@h��i�"�"���Ѿ�9������]��V<���" ��`%��&�0���1�+޺U����c�o6y�C��ѱL�G�߾UJ��R�������� ����f���؏��mI��xo�5 �{�9�\�3���s�S�;#��� ����W�$���#�C*;{�g�<���=�j��r�N�M@xJ*�U�r��4ƽd�-�o �ɝJ�'��K�e��N|���������,"�~�'!���9��X�ʰ������c�l�<��0�QN���K�9� 2�[|�2�����M�gP���:��<���C��*N�6{2���Bm؏��[�� 3�aiRu3\՞!�#�4����>�6&�\vn����I�=�pn�uJ���j&�G"c�̒|��S��P L�s�>R3��̕S�3��yOI�>��zX +/��}�S&��z#�g2:"fdX:y����5�4I�ӡ����yN��1Hv)�&��z::�V��m�<ꍎ2qI/,jc�s�4d�?,-k8����d{K����fF�K�aL�S2�j�����W^Nz��&�Bc�>��0&0I��aiK]~sॵ#ޚk�";ŢJ�m��E��0r ����ԛ�Vm��>�puᇴ��"J�qⳋO,���d'h��!���[}lϯ������ҠӦ2&�{�݆{]��<Zx�$��0���טwC��g*���_���{�� Q2�i���2I��.�$�k��^���Q��>����T��m�_X��(���r�b���@�kEyN9�z[s�p�N��k�@pș;b�Aj� ���:�ݬ���F��6�l��GA�'���O��k, ��.�D��ը�0` ��FA�� ��4�����~&�L�y��Ѯ@����'�Po�^M|�`2�u`s<��vL��U��n͋�-��ʧqrۑ�g����X>'n�?(~�1�pk����(Z�3�^��G=fp�,�t��8X�iF��Ҙ\|��.�G�-e�Qb �ltO�*8�C�� T���n��,��{S&�xA$�@?��ukd��{c������bSmm�6X�Pj�0��s.�0�]35&<���X�Qj��m�7�ޣM��M�u���3�Fj�rX�l�k{Xh��P�Q���,��5|f6L5��}��>�ÎF�ә�7�q���/f\�:�> �?w瞪�dA�>r`7�f��X�r��wQs,�[6��h_/L鈒�3D����E�b�n�Π�/��v��YD��j]0 ���zRW�����j�����t�R"?�~���]�fjRa���^[�ᪧ�Gn�4�����)�J����΁kq��Tq���>���C�U�����Rq2�W��"���Ԥ�t���ҼN��&0�hQ��%z8�(����ꅸ���$&��h��礖���먃ܒ[�R���=:x�V-
  9. prob would have been easier had it been red not pink but well done
  10. I don't recall ever hearing of that type of birthday having a specific name. I tried googling various terms though for about... an hour or so The only thing that I could find would be a Golden Birthday, which is when you have your 25th birthday when you were born on the 25th, etc. I did find this though (not sure if it'll help ): 3: Is it true that everyone celebrate their 28th birthday on the same weekday on which they were born? About 79 % of the people celebrate their 28th birthday on the weekday they were born. If you have already read the Babwani's Congruence especially pages 19-23 you would know the 5-6-11-6 cycle. Which means that your birthday falls on the same weekday of your birth in the cycle of 5 years, 6 years, 11 years and 6 years and again 5 years.... depending upon the type of year of your birth. Therefore, one can infer that one's birthday repeats on the same weekday of birth after 28 years. This takes place if the years follow the pattern of 1 leap year after every three non-leap years. (One in every four years) But this cycle is obstructed by the Heap year. (Heap years are those years which is divisible by 100 but not divisible by 400 E.g. 1800, 1900, 2100, 2200, etc.) A Heap year though looks like a Leap year because of its divisibility by 4, does not have 29 days in February. Therefore if a person is born in the year 1887 will not have his/her 28th birthday on the same weekday of his/her birth. Because he/she goes across through the Heap year where one day (29th February 1900) was missing thus disturbing the entire 5-6-11-6 cycle. Thus any one born on or in between 29 Feb 1872 to 28 Feb 1900 will not have his/her 28th birthday on the same weekday. However, one born on or in between 1 Mar 1900 to 28 Feb 2172 will have his/her 28th birthday on the same weekday. This includes every one of us. Thus, for practical purposes (for this present time) we all (about 100 %) have our 28th birthdays on the same weekday of our birth. This is because 2000 was not a Heap year but a normal Leap year.
  11. [quote name='Grido' date='26 February 2010 - 06:20 PM' timestamp='1267226448' post='55365'] I thought up an idea which whilst taking a while the first time you play, would then result in no spoilers. My idea is to enter CTC-MDC's of creatures you have, to unlock the card and previous levels of the creature, the MD code allows for you to determine the ID of the owner, which you can match against the person entering the game, to ensure that the player actually has those creatures, and isnt just using someone else's CTC's. You then wouldnt have an issue with anyone seeing stats of creatures they dont have, and so removes the issue of spoilers. Just takes a while when you go to start playing the first time. [/quote] And what if you don't have any crits because you sacced them?
  12. Sap from a tree?
  13. Uhm, how about one person gets to see all the responses, and is able to remove the ones that are clearly joking/not appropriate, and combine the true answers into several possible outcomes. Then, they take the possibilities, and send them to Mur to be incorporated, therefore Mur only has to read several, instead of several hundred.
  14. Ah ok, see, I thought by base stat, you meant only the stats from the lowest level of each crit was shown for every upgrade of it. Thank you for clarifying
  15. Dannngggg, I was doing good, won 5 games in a row then BAM! He copied my strategy I think, and won every card straight through O_O No time to react lol... awesome card game though. Perhaps a bit spoilerish, but I don't understand when you say you only show the base value to avoid spoilers... Currently: 5 wins, 1 loss, 4 wins, 1 loss, 4 wins, 1 loss, 10 wins, 1 loss, 4 wins.
  16. [quote name='CrazyMike' date='26 February 2010 - 05:59 AM' timestamp='1267181950' post='55279'] Yes.... I heard Blackberry supports Opera Mobile which supports Flash Lite. I am hoping someone already has it, but it looks like I would be the first. Wish me luck! [/quote] Good luck! Break a leg is used when acting, so break a... cord?... antenna?... codec?... this requires more thought
  17. It...is... pink!
  18. Never-mind, I'm an idiot Read it as Month/Day/Year, not Day/Month/Year so got confused Perfectly fine for me.
  19. [quote name='DarkPriestess' date='25 February 2010 - 08:48 AM' timestamp='1267105720' post='55201'] I gave Mur a gold coin because he said he didn't have one before this topic was made. Does this count? [/quote] Haha, I was totally there I gave a bird egg to Atlas but I didn't have this on my mind at the time so it's not like they are obligated to pass something on.
  20. [quote name='Kafuuka' date='24 February 2010 - 02:44 PM' timestamp='1267040658' post='55111'] lmao, that's wrong for so many reasons [/quote] Well, it very well could be right. I'm not going to go into the logic of it, but with similar brain teasers, it's possible for most every number to be correct.
  21. Welcome to the forums! :D

  22. http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/topic/6490-unacceptable-pl-entry/ As you can see, same person, very nearly the same pl entry.
  23. http://mmorpgindex.com/ Gives this: Warning: mysql_connect() [function.mysql-connect]: Can't connect to MySQL server on 'mmo0910003545727.db.4218798.hostedresource.com' (4) in /home/ggot666/public_html/MMO/mmorpgindex.com/sources/misc/skin.php on line 210 Could not connect:
  24. I'm in, at any time really.
  25. Yoshi

    Whatdahell?!

    Wow... Orlando, based on what you said, I or anyone else could be able to crash any plan you might have with no consequence. How would you feel if someone did that? Based off of what's been said, Redd has been wronged in a way that went against the rules of where he was. Whether it was on accident or on purpose I cannot say. I can say though, that the person that did it does not have enough maturity to either own up and apologize, or doesn't have enough of a conscious to admit it was them. Since the GGG is a community run place, you being a part of the community and not caring for the rules, have let down the community, and as a result, MD itself. Now, since there is no way to really find out who it was as of now, the best thing is to just change your plan as best you can, and move on. To avoid this in the future, you may have to either stop being idle there, or know the risk involved, or come up with another way to stop it from happening. And as someone said earlier, most MP3's would welcome the experience... I cringed while reading that. Perhaps that may be correct, but at the area where Redd was, he obviously did not want/need the experience, and therefore it WAS unwanted. Think before you start posting about how anyone should feel a certain way towards something. Not everyone has the same feelings/emotions towards similar ideas or situations. And Orlando, no-one should have to start over unless they choose to out of their own free will and not out of pressure from a certain event that occurred. Your post makes me realize your character, and frankly, I don't like it.
×
×
  • Create New...