Passant the Weak

I want to welcome this Change! Hello, have fun around!l

3 Gold

Warning: I just discover what illusions are, so take my opinion with a grain of salt. That being said: I understand someone in an illusion hides her real identity and looks different. However if someone gets in touch with the illusionist real alliance mechanism and kicks her, then the membership should be lost. The person has vhosen to be in an illusion, her real status (alliance membership) is not in an illusion. It's more an administrative status. And can still be lost.

Understood. I mean: cups of tea also have a limited life time (can't remember how much). I was wondering if the same issue (not refreshing the initial "birth date" with adding cups) could be ahppening. But maybe I should investigate and see if other people had the same problem. Will do.

I seem to have lost my Cups of tea. Could it be the same issue?

113) Recent alliances take over are a planned moved carefully prepared by MUR to give a pretext to radically change the alliance system.

After succesfully Pass Papers, there is a warning that appears in the weapon section of the profile: ***************************************************************** Weapon sets [b]Warning[/b]: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in [b]/home/magicdue/public_html/ui/userprofile/load_profile.php[/b] on line [b]226[/b] Properties of entire set are increased by 15% for each object you wear from that set ***************************************************************** Not critical since the papers work as expected, but I felt I should report it. Reason of the warning is probably obvious to who knows how it works.

Thanks for the clarification Rendril. I seemed to remember this working differently before but I might well be wrong. Topic can probably be closed and moved to Resolved section. Thanks!

Shuffling does restore the 8 avatars. I just tested. Strange that Burns does not remember buying one avatar for 2 years though. Unless he forgot!

[url="http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/221/7avyskai.jpg/"][img]http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/207/7avyskai.th.jpg[/img][/url] Uploaded with [url="http://imageshack.us"]ImageShack.us[/url] [url="http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/221/7avyskai.jpg/"]http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/221/7avyskai.jpg/[/url]

Avatar shop has always offered me a choice between 8 avatars. Recently I noticed it was showing only 7, although it says there are 668 available avatars in stock. I believe it's not normal (but please correct me if I'm wrong). I checked with a few people and Burns appear to have the same problem. I thought it could be because I recently bought one avatar from the shop, but Burns did not for 2 years +. I haven't tried shuffling the selection. If needed for some testing, please let me know.

[quote name='Liberty4life' timestamp='1326278304' post='100436'] i redid tests, at now... no arrows at necro nor lore gate has loyalty discount now... :s, and following nml locations give ap discount for me by correct value for all arrows same:[list] [*]pc exterior [*]road of battles [*]goe [*]tranquil plains [*]fenths press [*]meeting of the roads [*]winds game [/list] [/quote] I checked those places are tagged with no land. So it's definitely the same situation as what was described in the thread I linked. Nothing has changed. EDIT: beaten by Samon for a few minutes

I will cehck when back in NML, but looks like Samon is right. We are probably in the middle of an update. I'll try to check if anythuing changed in regards to loyalty bonus compared to what it was before that NML update.

Liberty, I posted a bug report some time ago about teh same subject but it was considered "normal" (I'm talking of places in NML classified either as No Man's land and offering no bonus, or as No homeland and offering your loyalty bonus). The thread is there: [url="http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/topic/10766-no-mans-land-vs-no-home-land-is-there-a-difference/"]http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/topic/10766-no-mans-land-vs-no-home-land-is-there-a-difference/[/url] Please check it out, in order to know if what you describe is different from that. If the Gate issue is solved, then you are probably talking of the same thing.

Thanks. i'll buy glasses.

Hello, Today i was in tribunal after a long walk. I logged off to avoid taking Skill Damage (there was some roaming around ). When I logged on again, I found myself in GoE. This happened just before Item dispatch reset, probably to prevent me from grabbing anything. Besides the bad news for the friends I have a party with tonight (sorry guys I won't bring booze, just the tea in my pocket will be available!), that raises a question to me. As far as I know I have no way to prevent nor counter such spell. Am I missing something? If not, then it would look like a "God" spell, which i can do nothing against. Which IMHO is not good.

Slightly related to the original post: is there a way to know who is sent to jail, reason and sentence? I failed to see any annoucement on Neno.

[quote name='samon' timestamp='1325893965' post='100194'] One big problem with completely forbidding having two alts logged in at the same time is that there are many 'false' alts. Players that actually are different persons but are still flagged as alts, for them it may become nearly impossible to play when they can't log on at the same time. [/quote] Yes. It would need to be indicated within the game database. There are many other issues with that rule, all solvable. I am not saying it's something I'd like to see implemented: it's really not worth the trouble IMO. I'd prefer people to behave!

I find the rule for being nominated Rookie of the year a bit unfair: I was lucky to start the game last year in February, thus being quite well known when December comes. Someone who started in November had no chance for 2011 Rookie and will not be eligible in 2012 if the rule is not changed. My suggestion (assuming teh award ceremony is in December 2012): - are eligible for the 2012 Rookie of the Year award, players who have started the game after 2011 June 1st. I don't see the need of adding a limit in AD.

Not sure what you want to be done. I replaced one Johnson by Fyrd... please check

It's in the restriction section: [quote] [b]Uncommon things that you CAN do[/b][list] [*]You can have multiple accounts, to try out story, to experince new ways of play etc ..., however if you are detected that you are using them just to help one of your main accounts , all of them including the main will get banned. [/list] [/quote] The discussion in the thread that was locked was precisely around this "fine line" between what is authorised and what is not. I think consensus was (almost) reached that if you are using ALTs to help your main know what happens somewhere, and thus make the choice whether you will go there or not is against the rule. I perfectly agree with all what Magistra said on that matter. Other people said that you are doing the same when talking to other people either ingame or via external messenger to get those information. Well, that is perfectly allowed (even encouraged as far as i understand MD's policy) and it's called teaming. You just can't team with your ALT, pretty simple rule. Then, there will always be people claiming that they don't learn things that way with their ALTs, or that you can't prove they do. But it does not make this behaviour more legit. loose rules are the most convenient when people want to play fair game. Only when people try to abuse the system you need to tighten the rules. That happened with shared tools. If we want no possibility of ALT abuse the way it was evocated in the other thread, because some go beyond the line, then the best way would be: - either forbid ALTs (with all usual implications/arguing that come from that) or - forbid having 2 ALTs connected at the same time and - make an ingame mechanism forbidding to log on with an ALT within x hours after another was used Of course those rules and ingame mechanisms can always be bypassed by usual tools used by MultiAccount professionals And they would hurt badly those who use ALTs for playing 2 different characters fair way.

You can't sacrify Nadrolski! I would get it for a symbolic silver but have no slot right now. If you can wait a few days/week, I would happily get him and make him fart or so.

I'm very secretive with my privacy. However i have no problem marking the big city I live at. It's voluntary action isn't it?

I, for one, am not asking Eon to prove he is [s]guilty [/s]innocent ([size=2][i]edited[/i][/size]). I have just asked 2 questions in page 2 of that thread, that answering of would probably close the discussion. We are not in a trial here dst, unless I understood your thread wrong. But in a discussion within the community. I remind my questions: [quote]Are you using your ALTS to spot activity in different areas so that you know what's hoing on and your main can go wherever there is something to get? Have you been using your ALT to record data about shared items abuse in the log room? That benefitted to your main (if you ever got a bounty, that is!)[/quote] That would harm nobody to just answer that, would it ? It's just simple questions on what people called out in your initial post seem to have issue with. Of course you can chose to stay on general things like "everyone is innocent unless proven guilty", "people will never say they abuse ALTs", "people are coward and complain about nothing", "people can use ALTs for whatever they want they don't have to state how" etc, etc, etc.

[quote name='dst' timestamp='1325801187' post='99859'] Kyphis, I have nothing to prove. It's like me making an alt to test a thing and once I am done with it I simply let it "rot" somewhere. Do I NEED to have a role for it if I wish to log in once in a while just because I can? Is this really what you're saying? [/quote] If you were in Eon's situation I would just ask you the same question I asked him above. They are fairly simple, and do not force you to tell about a role or whatever. Just state that you are not using ALTs to help main.