Udgard

It normally lasts 10-15 minutes from memory. Before that you cannot leave the illusion, but once you passed that duration, you still need to manually exit the illusion from the illusion tab.

Just checking, how many new daily clues are given out per day, 1 or 3?

No tokens, I assume?

8gc

43sc

41s for memory stones.

19 silver for the memory stones.

1 gc 1 sc for the memory stones.

Happy birthday!

Happy b'day!

Why are people neg-repping lib's post? I found that it is one of the most informative posts here regarding the history of the aramors.. And on another note, are people looking to find out things connected to the aramors ICly (what story they might be assigned as reasons for existence etc), or the OOC reasons behind it?

Happy birthday!

Happy birthday Led!

Well to be fair, you did say "I am not Fenrir" in the forum before, where RP is not allowed (and thus, I would assume all posts should be taken OOC). Though knowing the RL name of Fenrir and Seigheart is the same, it was kinda a given that you're the same person in RL. Kinda made me lol at some of the PL entries that insisted you are not Fenrir (though to be fair, some of them might be talking ICly). Well, I guess it's a good thing that this is now out in the open for those who might have wondered.

Happy Birthday!

[quote][color="#CCCCCC"]Ann. 1830 - [2011-04-29 01:08:39 - Stage 10][/color] Any player that wishes to be part of an alliance needs to now be at least MP4 level to join.[/quote] A player needs to be mp4 to join, nothing says they need to be one to stay inside. CMIIW

Last I checked, people belong to a land, not the land that belongs to the people. I never remember Mur saying "once you become a citizen of a land, the land and all of its contents are yours, no one else may do anything there without your permission". As much as I prefer if people do not deplete and leave resources at 2/3rd. calling them thief and stuff seems wayyy overboard. Just my 2 silver coins.

On a related question, if you have 1k more losses than wins (hence falling to skilldamage area), will losing on cap make you lose stats? I assume this skilldamage works on the same basis as skillgain instead of the skilldamage stat basis, but it's just a guess.

Safe travels, we're gonna miss you around

[quote name='Yrthilian' timestamp='1328178703' post='103162'] Wrong! wrong!! wrong!!! The war treath came from LR first. Please if you are goign to make a statment make one of fact. when they made the treath i retuned it with a promise of war IF the one that cause the offence at the time apoligised. Raven did not have to step down. He was given 2 options he chose to step down since he could not get the ofending person to apoligise for abuse of powers. The war still happened we took over an alliance and did damge before he steped down. [/quote] No. Blackthorn was (unneededly, yes) offended by MRD's meddling with Savelites, and asked "Are you trying to start a war?". The first declaration of war (or to be precise, threats to start a war) was from you. Of course, you could say that the war happened the moment you threathened to start a war between GG and LR, though that's not what it looks like, at least from the other side (where Raven stepped down to [u]prevent [/u]war). And I do not remember the Savelites take over being done as part of the war (or during, even). Can't seem to find the topics about it on the forum anymore though, so I'm gonna stop here for now lest I go even more offtopic. On topic: A call-for-vote system sounds like a good idea. I do think that the scoring should be harsher than just a 51% majority vote for a land to be declared on war with another land though. Anything less than.. say 75-80% would mean it won't be labeled a "land war". (imagine an extreme scenario, 51% says go to war, 49% don't.. It's not fair to say that land X is at war with land Y just because 51% of land X citizen wants to). The 51% can go to war, just that it's a personal war, not an attack from that land per se.

Just confirming, does this mean someone who wants to vote has to contact 1 of the three vote-takers, or all 3 ?

[quote name='Yrthilian' timestamp='1328110500' post='103093'] The way one of the wars was won was that i declaired a player step down from their position and new person to be elected and i stated whom would not be accepted as the new leader. After much forum wars and in game fighting what i asked for was done. [/quote] Correction: technically there was never a war. You broke the treaty and threatened to start a war if Raven didn't step down, which he did to prevent war from happening. On topic: What does the community think about main alliances' power over the land, really? I remember a lot of bitching on the forums during the loreroot HC elections when they wrongly assumed that the HC wanted to control the land.. I see the ability to decide who the land goes to war with as one of the ultimate form of control against the land. Also, there's an issue if the main alliance wants to go to war, while other alliances don't. Since they all belong to the same land, this would mean they would be forced to go to war as well. I think it would be better if it requires all of the land's alliances' agreement to declare a war, and if a uniform stance cannot be formed, the war would affect the participating alliances only (which makes it an alliance war really, not a land war).

Uh, no 24 hours wait? I went to sleep with my bid as the highest and the earliest thing I see in the morning is that I've been outbid and the sale finish... My bid is even still the one posted on the first post as highest @_@ I'd still like to bid higher..