Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

MagicDuel Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Images

Aethon

Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Aethon

  1. Aethon replied to MaGoHi's topic in New Ideas
    This is the description for Guardian Army: Guardian Army Spell (+4) Allows you to use your army to guard an other character for a limited time. When that character will be attacked, the attacker will fight you instead. Good for roleplay but but also for practical use. It might have unexplored results under special situations. It will grant 4 casts, regenerable every two weeks, or increase maximum cast number by 4 if you allready have the spell. I think the best course of action is to get the existing spell "fixed" to it it's original description, as currently the they aren't guarded, they're given the creatures when attacking.
  2. Aethon replied to MaGoHi's topic in New Ideas
    Guardian army only works on outgoing attacks, not incoming. If the spell is supposed to guard on defence, then the spell should be fixed for that. If the spell is supposed to guard on offense then no, this idea would not make the spell void. As for the guard option, I feel it should only be based as a spell and not be dependent on stats. I can see too many different types of abuses coming from this; an example would be a player could become immune and still gain from it. Guardian army allows the target to attack with a more power, but also stops the target from gaining the rewards. It is a pro/con balancing scenario. I also think that it could be abused in fighting competitions such as heads (if it were ever to reappear), TC or other such competitions. In short: I think the idea is alright, but it should be done as a WP spell -- or have guardian army clarified as to a defensive or offensive spell and then work from there. Edit: Didn't see your post added as I was replying.
  3. Dream joker, 5sc
  4. No, because he has brought the "un-truths" to light before they could be spread. Whilst it may have only been to one for now, that one person could have easily continued to spread false accusations, creating a chain reaction. It doesn't matter who starts a game of Chinese whispers, it only matters where it finishes and the outcome.
  5. You may take part but, like with any others, any tasks you've already completed (outside of the quest), you cannot complete again. I will continue adding new ways to get heat stones. :)
  6. Ah thank you. Could I perhaps suggest making the options a little more obvious? Perhaps make it in a button?
  7. From what I read (which was everything in chat) he did not ask specifically for your story, he asked what happened and the reasoning. Your opinion can influence your reasoning, but slandering and lying is another thing; this extends to talking about Firsanthalas as if you were best friends or detailing historical happenings falsely. If you are to give your opinions on a happening, make sure that is known before hand. If you don't know the real history, research first. Slander is slander and should not be acceptable in any case, however. (Especially when you've only just said to the person you're slandering that you wish to make amends...)
  8. Can you cite this please? If it's true, it would be interesting to look into and possibly document. :)
  9. I also have never had those options, though it would be nice to...
  10. https://magicduel.com/page/Announcement/view/3067 Only "Sky is visible" tag is effected. Open bright doesn't necessarily mean it's open to the sky (not sure what scene that coord is from memory) so there could be a roof or obstruction to prevent rain. Also, have you tested this? Are you sure all other water scenes do? Or is it a guess?
  11. I would kidnap employ judges in private. The less known about the judges during the quest the better (as this makes it harder for any bribery, flattery or any such bias resulting action to take place.)
  12. So here's the beginning stages, pre-potting! http://imgur.com/DDhm2w4,CFkfKgG And here's the potted version (MD written far end) http://imgur.com/OCVBiyI Now to wait 2 weeks for them to sprout! :) P.s. The oils you see in the background were made with the Chillis and Basil that I've previously grown! :D
  13. Thank you! Was a nice and interesting quest to take part in. Sad that I won by default though and no one else took part. :( Congrats Dst and Jubba :)
  14. Honestly, not sure. Most likely a blood drop as those are the ones I remove when I do.
  15. No! We don't exist! It's all lies! :ph34r: On a more serious note; if people are interested in this I can do my best to make it happen.
  16. Happy birthday. Hope you have a lovely time with those that are special to you and have an awesome day...you old, beautiful sassy man.
  17. When removing tokens sometimes it leaves a creature with a blank "[]" section: It seems that when the creature has a token added back to it though this is the first slot to be filled. (This happened to my angien but no screenshots to show it) Method to Reproduce: 1) Remove token 2) Check creature 3) Try adding token to creature with "[]"
  18. Points were corrected. Winners reordered
  19. Thank you. Just got home so will sort this now. My fault for not noticing.
  20. I have added a feedback poll to this quest. Please vote and leave any comments you may below. Thanks all. -A Edit: I think that would be very nice, but is not down to me to decide. (As I know you know and weren't meaning) I'd definitely add my vote to say throw them a point or two as well. (If needs be they can share my 5)
  21. Judging was based on the following scores: 1) Conformity - Did the player(s) stick to the dinner and role theme? 2 Originality - Were they original? Or was it the same old shtick? 3) Roleplay - How good was their roleplaying? 4) Embodiment of the Role - Did the player(s) become the role(s) they played? Were you convinced?) 5) Humour - Was it fun to read? Did it make you chuckle or laugh? 6) Adaptability - How well did they react to other's RP? Did they cope well with having role swapped or missing a go? 1) 1-10 points 2) 1-10 points 3)1 -20 points 4) 1-20 points 5) 1- 5 points 6) 1-30 points Here's how our judges scored: [log=Judge 1] 1 = 87 Conformity - 10 Originality - 9 Roleplay - 18 Embodiment of the Role - 19 Humour - 5 Adaptability - 26 2 = 86 Conformity - 10 Originality - 8 Roleplay - 18 Embodiment of the Role - 19 Humour - 5 Adaptability - 26 3 = 88 Conformity - 10 Originality - 8 Roleplay - 19 Embodiment of the Role - 19 Humour - 5 Adaptability - 27 4 = 84 Conformity - 10 Originality - 8 Roleplay - 17 Embodiment of the Role - 19 Humour - 4 Adaptability - 26 5 = 87 Conformity - 10 Originality - 8 Roleplay - 18 Embodiment of the Role - 19 Humour - 5 Adaptability - 27 6 = 84 Conformity - 10 Originality - 8 Roleplay - 18 Embodiment of the Role - 17 Humour - 5 Adaptability - 26 7 = 87 Conformity - 10 Originality - 9 Roleplay - 18 Embodiment of the Role - 18 Humour - 5 Adaptability - 27 8 = 86 Conformity - 10 Originality - 8 Roleplay - 19 Embodiment of the Role - 18 Humour - 5 Adaptability - 26 9 = 86 Conformity - 10 Originality - 8 Roleplay - 18 Embodiment of the Role - 18 Humour - 5 Adaptability - 27 [/log] ---------------- [log=Judge 2] 1 = 86 Conformity - 10 Originality - 10 Roleplay - 19 Embodiment of the Role - 19 Humour - 3 Adaptability - 25 2 = 88 Conformity - 10 Originality - 10 Roleplay - 19 Embodiment of the Role - 19 Humour - 5 Adaptability - 25 3 = 84 Conformity - 10 Originality - 10 Roleplay - 18 Embodiment of the Role - 20 Humour - 2 Adaptability - 24 4 = 91 Conformity - 10 Originality - 10 Roleplay - 20 Embodiment of the Role - 20 Humour - 4 Adaptability - 27 5 = 93 Conformity - 10 Originality - 10 Roleplay - 20 Embodiment of the Role - 20 Humour - 4 Adaptability - 29 6 = 89 Conformity - 10 Originality - 10 Roleplay - 19 Embodiment of the Role - 20 Humour - 5 Adaptability - 25 7 = 90 Conformity - 9 Originality - 10 Roleplay - 20 Embodiment of the Role - 20 Humour - 3 Adaptability - 28 8 = 92 Conformity - 10 Originality - 10 Roleplay - 20 Embodiment of the Role - 20 Humour - 4 Adaptability - 28 9 = 81 Conformity - 10 Originality - 10 Roleplay - 17 Embodiment of the Role - 18 Humour - 2 Adaptability - 24[/log] ------------------ [log=Judge 3] 1 = 70 Conformity - 8 Originality - 7 Roleplay - 16 Embodiment of the Role - 16 Humour - 3 Adaptability - 20 2 = 67 Conformity - 9 Originality - 7 Roleplay - 18 Embodiment of the Role - 18 Humour - 5 Adaptability - 10 3 = 61 Conformity - 8 Originality - 6 Roleplay - 15 Embodiment of the Role - 14 Humour - 2 Adaptability - 16 4 = 67 Conformity - 9 Originality - 8 Roleplay - 10 Embodiment of the Role - 16 Humour - 2 Adaptability - 22 5 = 81 Conformity - 9 Originality - 7 Roleplay - 22 Embodiment of the Role - 20 Humour - 3 Adaptability - 20 6 = 79 Conformity - 9 Originality - 5 Roleplay - 22 Embodiment of the Role - 20 Humour - 3 Adaptability - 20 7 = 76 Conformity - 9 Originality - 8 Roleplay - 20 Embodiment of the Role - 16 Humour - 3 Adaptability - 20 8 = 77 Conformity - 7 Originality - 9 Roleplay - 17 Embodiment of the Role - 17 Humour - 5 Adaptability - 20 9 = 54 Conformity - 8 Originality - 4 Roleplay - 8 Embodiment of the Role - 12 Humour - 2 Adaptability - 20[/log] -------------------- Due to the above the total scores stand at: (1)Lintara = 243/285 (2)Jubaris = 241/285 (3)Sunfire = 233/285 (4)Ungod = 242/285 (5)Zleiphneir = 261/285 (6)Nimrodel = 252/285 (7)AmberRune = 253/285 (8)Aeoshattr = 253/285 (Winner of voting -- tie break) (9)Miq = 221/285 1st: Zleiphneir 2nd: Aeoshattr 3rd: AmberRune So concludes our Deranged Dinner! Thank you to all of those that attended, to watch or partake in the festivities, and thank you to my three wonderful judges! Winners: Congratulations! I will hand out rewards as soon as possible (probably tonight). Non-Winners: Commiserations, but! On the bright side! You all get 1 Christmas point for taking part! Better luck next time and thank you for taking part - you were ALL great! Judges: Thank you for your work (and some at short notice). I will be handing out a reward to each of you as a token of gratitude. Note: Apologies for any mistakes (counting, format, etc) it's 2am and I've only my iPad to sort this all :) Let me know if there's any major mistakes and I'll endeavour to correct them.
  22. So am I now to return the gold as I've been kicked to 4th?
  23. I wouldn't kick yourself too hard Sy! It was a great idea for a quest and good fun to take part in! Mistakes happen to us all! :)
  24. My point was, many quests are made that have no connection to MD, all rewarding different types of rewards. What's the difference between awarding a drachorn or WP for a non-related quest? A reward is a reward at the end of the day? Given to someone for good work? I don't get why that has to be a barrier between in game or out of game so long as it's us as a community?

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.