Muratus del Mur

[b]===================================== NEXT WAVE OF QUESTIONS GOES HERE ===================================== [/b] .Grido. (ID:7251) What is sanity? i mean in general, the insane person denys their insanity, and so does a sane person, if someone says they're insane it means that they aren't as it shows rational thought, yet it's also said there's a fine line between insanity and genius, and geniuses show rational thought. so what is it? Mur: round 2 -------------------- .Ailith. (ID:80963) What is the answer? Mur: Its that place where we decide to stop the question (not necessarly its end). Questions have no end, just places where we pick as beeing the general accepted end. 2+2=4 only because we agree on a coordinate system, but it could be the same also 5 or 1 or so on.. round 2 -------------------- MRV (ID:103641) does life (or human life, if you'd prefer to differentiate) have any value in itself? - why? which, if any, consequences do you derive from that thought? Mur: this question had two versions, the other vesion was personal and was replied by pm. round 2 ------------- Lifeline (ID:102239) what is death to u? (a constant companion who keeps reminding u how precious ur time is, something that challenges u? or something to avoid and to fear, something that simly ends it? or perhaps even see death as the stripping away of everything u ARE not, as a chance to really awaken. or maybe something completely different?) Mur: death is that end of the question that marks the border between serial and cyclic. Death is an answer in its nature, but not the answer we seek, its just the last answer that hppens after we collected all the answers we could. Death is a border that differentiates life from beeing a circle and life beeing a cycle. The one alive is life itself not each individual. THe speecies survives , its individuals follow a cyclic pattern and have to die and born to fullfill the cyclicity principle of the bigger "organism" thats life itself. Life never dies. Open to debate ----------------- Azrael Dark (ID:18615) If everything in the universe is made of atoms, and people are made of atoms, and atoms behave probabilistically, is there truly such thing as free will? Mur: free willl is a concept that has meaning only between two complexity planes or more. You can have free will inside the decision scheme of a system but this will not change the general direction of the system (the higher complexity plane). See random numbers for example, output a generated list of random numbers, why is it that you never get for example "999999999999999999999999" in a row, and why is it that the overall analysed numbers will have an almost equal distribution of each number from 0-9? They are random inside their own complexity level , but seen from above their "free will" is not relevant to anything. Open to debate ---------- .Metal Bunny. (ID:11799) Knowing you do not believe in god, do you think there is an absolute morality? Regardless of having absolute or relative morality, is getting caught the only sin? Hypothetically speaking; if you said yes to the 2nd question, does that mean you have no conscience? Does that imply you are not fully human? Mur: "knowing i do not believe in god" let me enlighten you a bit: my understanding of what god is (not who) made me decide that what most people agree on is not what i agree on so when someone asks me if i believe in god i must say no because what i believe in has nothing to do with thei image of what god is. Its not about religion its about self discovery. To understand god you must understand he does not exist. That sounds blsfamous, but for me god is an answer to a question that should never be answer in oder to fully understand it and without understanding the question fully any answer is false, anything you name that that its at the end of the question its wrong because its named. DO you think its a concidence both islam and christianity give 1000 names to God and Allah? Because one would be false, the less you name the more accurate you are. there is absolute morality because we as beeings are very much alike at the base. Moral guidelines have a purpose that affect the species not the indiidual. Its an art to combine personal interes and species survival. Life is interested in evolution not survival and for that animals have well established instincts and way of life, our way of life as humans is called or guided by moral. ---------------------- Liberty (ID:83289) what is liberty, peace and justice? are those 3 terms together as a total freedom? and then what is total freedom? is it something to let/allow us achieve anything? and then why to achieve something? at one point we pass out from this world, so why we want to achieve things, why we want to leave something for others that will come after we die? Mur: round2 ----------------------- *Princ Rhaegar* (ID:62639) if God is perfect being, allpowerful why he makes mistakes? according to bible (i am atheist btw) why he created life? why wants people to worship him? cause he's egoistic maniac? does God support ThE Bunny empire? Mur: what god, should we start and offend any religion by claiming one or the other god is the most powerful one? Should we consider all are right and then gods are just obsessed beeings playing around with humans? Or should we ignore thousands of years of polytheism and think one or two RECENT religions are the right ones? ..So what god is that? I am not even starting to explain my view on god and most beleivers get stuck in basic questions. And yes, i am sure that god supports the Bunny empire, but then we go to first issue again ) ------------ .Metal Bunny. (ID:11799) What is happiness? Mur: Try to see life as a bigger organism that is composed by all the individual living beeings. Happiness is same as pleasure, the the indication that we do what life wants us to do. We get wealthy or in love, means we perpetuate the species, means "life" is happy. Problem comes when humans cheat life to get pleasure for destructive things, thats the question, but you asked something else. Open for debate ------------------------------- .Zleiphneir. (ID:77300) Is evolution, survival of the fittest/best disguised etc, actually a demonstration of the process of extinction of any and all of an entire species and not the opposite as it claims? Mur: round 2 / debate -------------------------- .Zleiphneir. (ID:77300) Do we use objects, or do objects use us? Mur: if we were to be used by objects it would mean we would be only reacting to inevitable and we obviouly are not, o i think we are using objects now the opposite. But maybe i do not understand the quetion? ---------------------------- Cless (ID:45711) Do our dreams define us? Mur: debate, round 2 ------------------------------ phantasm (ID:137291) 1. In the beginning there was nothing, in the end there will be nothing. What lies in the middle? Mur: assuming your saying is correct, then obviously in the middle would be everything. My version is that this should not be seen as a linear thing, such as then now in the future...and to support this afirmation i ask you something ...if "in the middle" is everything, wouldnt that means that everything includes also "nothing", its "everything" afterall. ..so if it does, wouldnt that be a paradox? Its hard to understand time staticaly, i tried to do that with the shades but ... debate ---------------------------------- Beril (ID:88062) Does someone/something has to be intelligent in order to be a fool or act like stupid? Extremes allways touch, thats my motto. I have to see your question in a more obvious context to avoid considering it incomplete..so i would ask if its required to be intelligent to play a stupid (liek an actor) ..because otherwise anyone can behave foolish by mistake. Yes, you act as a fool by beeing one truly, or by having the mental power to imitate it perfectly. --------------------------------- .Cryxus. (ID:91129) Why are wars so profitable? with the loss of life, ammunition, and other gear it would be counter-productive. Mur: just like you said, because of consumption. What is consumption? one part gaining losses and one part counterbalancing by getting profit. In war those that fight are one part , those that supply weapons and goods are the other part, they get the profit. Expenses means money, money menas debt, debt is the only true value that big people controll. ---------------------------- StrongWilled Legna (ID:74199) Who am i? (reformulated) Mur: seen as a general question and not one addressed to ME....i am still seeking this answer. round 2 -------------------------- The Witch Doctor (ID:128472) If God ia Allmighty and He can do ANYTHING, can He create a rock so big and heavy so that He can't lift it? Mur: speaking about a theoretical all mighty force (because my view of god might stop this queston before it starts), i guess you answered your question alone... anything that is everything must also be nothing, as nothing is part of everything, so in the end it will be nothing. If something is not powerfull enough to be nothing then its not absolute. If god can create a rock so heavy so will vanish as a concept, if he cant he will dissapear from the start .... i am sory to be so pessimistic ) ------------- Jtz Champion (ID:79270) Would morality exist without religions? Mur: let me ask you this...would religions exist without morality? my guess your question answer is yes, this question answer is no, so there is something wrong in here. round 2 --------------- .Pamplemousse. (ID:91984) Do you think that there is any such thing as a truly unselfish act? Sure people help others all the time, but it makes them feel good, so they get something out of it. Even if someone were to do something that hurt them, if they got even the slightest bit of pleasure out of it or satisfaction in knowing that they did something right, would it make it a selfish act? Is there anything purely selfless in this world? (Not MD, but Earth.) Mur: i dont think so, but its a personal opinion and i am not 100% sure of it debate round 2 ------------- Done sory for the questions i did not post, but i only picked those that made me think most.

[b]Here are the most AWSOME questions i heard so far, yet i tried to answer them, keep trying. Those marked with round 2 will be considered for reward in the next stage. [/b] Ledah (ID:5305) IF a tree falls, and nothing is around, will it, does it make a sound? Mur: if NOTHING is arround, the tree will never move. Movement is relative. ----------- .MRD. (ID:38385) As we know everything has two sides. If you look at a door, you know there is another side. If you look at your computer, it has another side correct? So I ask you this question.... Where is the end of space, the universe type? and if there is an end..........what is on the other side? and if it does have something on the other side, then does it really end? Mur: The universe sides are infinity and nothingness. THats why its gets apparently inifinite if you walk towards the edges, space dilates untill it gets to nothing and therefore you will alter the perception of space, speed and time and walk forever, because you can not touch nothingness...its not like void. (see my lecture about space and time) Infinity and nothingness are both concepts that are not native to our mind and we all understand just a part of them fully. Of course, the usual disclaimer, thats just a theory <img src="http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=" " border="0" alt="smile.gif" /> ------------------ MRWander (ID:85143) Why are dragons known to every culture around the world yet are 'mythical beasts' ? Mur: Each creature has a so called Energy print. Some energy prints that manage to be stable, cause manifestations in matter and are in the animals around us. But energy prints are actualy sort of "conclusions" when energy groups together , and some prints are too complex to be manifestated into matter beeings, because of that they are not, but humans can still get in touch with them, see them, or even become them if trained properly (see asia) . Dragons, as well as many other, are such creatures. We feel and know they are there, we talk and write about them, yet none sees them, because we do not look in the right direction. -------------------- Windy (ID:86324) If a tree falls in the woods, and no one hears it, does it make a sound? Mur: Yes, for itself, plant sense sound too -------------------- King Daimon (ID:146189) Who are YOU? Mur: round 2 -------------------- I am Bored (ID:38621) What is Boredom? Mur: round 2 --------------------- Liberty (ID:83289) we live, then at one moment we die, why do we have to die, whats purpose of death and what after we die? Mur: Living beeings are self containing mini universes, the principle ballances within us is perfect or tends to be. I believe we are manifestation of information fields that by nature seek to adapt to the principle ballance of the universe we live in. Life and death are the ballance between syntropy and entropy in our mini universe that we mirror. Based on this theory, cyclicity as well as other principles should be "satisfied" so it could be an explanation why life is cyclic. All the things we do , from filling our neurons with info to the gene that cause death (yup) is programmed by nature to fulfill and keep the principles stable. If one principle goes wrong the entire ballance is lost and the information fields causing all this can not manifest themselves anymore. This is just a theory, suited to fit with religious beliefs of many cultures as well with my own researches on the matter in cause. It could be tottaly wrong. Selected for public debate, but not for round 2 because of the popularity of the question. -------------------- Fenrir Greycloth (ID:86191) Is the human race essentially good, or evil? What makes us good, or evil? What is Good? What is evil? How did we come to a conclusion that these are a way of behaving? Mur: only a third observer can observe the line of good or evil and understand the situation, not someone "inside" the issue bad/good. In humanity situation, i believe the observer is the world around us, what supports life and what brought us in the first place to existance. Considering that our impact on the nature around us, the earth and the rest of the life on earth is not at all good, i consider humanity overall can be considered BAD. We are the only animal to kill for pleasure, thats a luxury that no living beeing affords. We can, but chose not to do things to keep the ballance , we can but chose to be evil, or good, but over all i think the results of humanity over the nature, and i do not talk of ecosystem only, is i essance bad. animals are not good or evil, they are neutral, they do not chose to be evil, they do not chose to be good. We are tehnicaly capable to do better yet we dont, and its not about survival also. thats my personal opinion, and i wait for arguments against, if you think i am wrong. Selected for public debate, but not for round 2 because of the popularity of the question. ------------------------------- stormrunner (ID:47728) how do you get the perfect woman? Mur: By imagining that what you are is "the perfect man" and see what fits with you <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=" " border="0" alt="smile.gif" /> ------------------------- Talos Salvitore (ID:152987) Did the feminist movement end up destroying a woman's right to choose between working and staying home? Mur: Selected for public debate, i don't consider the question interesting enough for round 2 but i am not sure if its answerable without documentation or not ------------------------- Talos Salvitore (ID:152987) Why do you think that more people are born during periods of depression than periods of prosperity? Mur: answerable by psyhology explenation yet it could hold more info to it, goes to round 2 and public debate ------------------------ Shadowseeker (ID:50659) What is the definition of success, if that exists at all? And I mean not only saying when things go the right way, I mean an abstract idea, always within every successful event, even if it's only a pyrrhic victory or a complete win. Or even a loss, if the greater goal is achieved that way. So success is something depending on the point of view...what is it without that, seen in abstract? Mur: round 2, public debate ----------------------- *Princ Rhaegar* (ID:62639) if at beginning there was nothing, how from nothing was created something? time actually doesn't have a beginning? Mur: Things are limited or unlimed only when you are inside them. Looking at the universe wont make any sense and such questions will allways remain unanswered. Try to understand how both infinity and nothingness can be one yet still different and you will see what experience are just effects. I consider the universe as something spreading, also in a physical sense, from "everything" to "nothing". The concept of infinity and nothing are usuay wrong in our head because we compare them with things we know and they cand actualy be infinite or non existant. Look for example at a fractal <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal</a> and understand how an infinite shape can actualy have a finite form at the same time. Someone "inside" that shape, walking on its edge, will never understand that there is a shape or that the shape is defineable by a very short formula (sample formula to generate endless fractal shape: z = z^2 + c THATS ALL!!). I strongly believe infinity is achievable within a limited space , if compared from one complexity level to an other. Selected for public debate, but not for round 2 because of the popularity of the question. -------------------------- *Princ Rhaegar* (ID:62639) and why life was created? with what purpose? Mur: I belive life appeared as a manifestation of something that is allready there, probably caused by the planet itself, probably by the universe itself (NO i do not believe in god created the world!!) Life can be sensed and can exist also without matter, and to keep its stability it requires matter. Living beeings manifest a mirror of the universe in their principles ballance, i consider them like mini universes from a principle point of view. They could be the counterballance for the excessive entropy in the universe, sort of self ballancing of the universe by creating syntropy. Syntropy happens in the core of stars and in life, no wonder stars and living things are so connected. Selected for public debate, but not for round 2 because of the popularity of the question. ------------------------- King Bull (ID:67761) the Question..... is not............. do you believe in God? this i know the answer too already... i have seen you actknowledge God many times... so this automatically tells me the answer... now for the question. Genesis 1st book of the bible chapter 1, 2, 3, chapter 4 verse 16 and 17 the question: in the beginning god created heaven and earth. then he created adam and eve, they had children cain and abel.... Genesis verse 16 : then Cain went out from the presents of the Lord and dewlt in the land of Nod on the east of eden, Genesis Verse 17: And Cain knew his wife, and she concieved and bore Enoch....... the question is where Cains come wife come from? at this point there was only Adam and Eve and thier children..... Where did Cains wife come from? Mur: It came from the absurdity in the logic used to create those stories. People can't simply understand complex things, they need examples, mostly from their lives. The church needed a full monopoly over the creation of man and the universe and man needed an answe above all ..who care if it makes sense? it did for over thousand years. i can't believe in those child stories, but because its a book full of wisdom, and absurdities (or missunderstand sacrated knowledge how some prefer to call them, oops, just ignore my opinion on religion....) i think its awsome for public debate. round 2 (i might give an answer in round 2) ------------------------- Tzaroth747 (ID:101892) Why do you seek knowledge? Mur: round 2 p.s by you i understand you in general. ------------------------- Guybrush Threepwood (ID:140626) So, is the natural state of things ordered or disordered? In the beginning was there chaos or order? (Everything or nothing?) Mur: round 2 -------------------------- Kafuuka (ID:114145) What is a principle? Mur: round 2 --------------------------- Lightsage (ID:63991) Why do electrons effect each other if they're shot in different directions and one is monitored? (electrons do different things when monitored then when they're simply "shot" from an electron canon and it is only reviewed afterwards what they have done) Mur the process of observing is in its fact an intrusive process, you "receive" something in order to observe, be it light from the objects, sounds, movement, etc .. in case of a single particle , it has nothing to offer, the observation process will interfere with its nature and affect the observed particle my opinion Lightsage RE:Yes but in this case 2 electrons where shot each in a different direction, only 1 was observed but the other was effected by this as well even through it was meters away. public debate ------------------------------- .simplyzero. (ID:13313) What is....? Mur: round 2 -------------------------------

[color="#FF0000"]<b>QUESTION COLLECTING ENDED, RESULTS WILL BE DECIDED BASED ON ..What you do (read the rest of the topic). ====================================</b>[/color] I am putting up a Bounty , a ROYAL bounty, for who sends me the most interesting question i ever heard. The questions can be from well known questions about life universe or such to the simples apparently insignificat ones. The question must puzzle me. If i feel i can answer it or that the answer is achievable in a boring (documenting) way, i wont select the question. The question must make someone realy think and not require other documentation to solve it other than your own mind. Except that, there is no guide or limit to what kind of question you can ask. I will make the selected questions public and i will pic one, or more for the final prize. Also i will invite those that put the questions that get selected, to hold a public depate based on them , if they agree to do so. How do you send them to me? by PM only, and only from your account you compete with, dont send via someone else. Finding a way to do so is also a challange like allways and shows you care to find one not simply throw in a random question. DISCLAIMER: THE ANSWERS I WILL GIVE BELOW ARE MY PERSONAL VISION OF HOW THINGS ARE, I DO NOT CLAIM THEM AS THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH BUT IS THE BEST TRUTH I COULD FIND ON THAT MATTER. BECAUSE THIS IS A PERSONAL COMPETITION BETWEEN ME MUR AND YOU, AND NOT A GENERAL MD COMPETITON, I WILL JUDGE THINGS IN A SELFISH WAY AND DECIDE IF THE QUESTION IS INTERESTING OR NOT WITHOUT PUTTING UP FOR A VOTE <img src="http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=" " border="0" alt="smile.gif" /> Note: i am doing this with the hope it will be regarded as a great source for future lectures/debates not only by me but most of all by those placing the questions! Also, answering your questions helps me better understand things. Archivists, feel free to take info from here for the archives. CURRENT REWARD LIST: winners get to pick one from the list in order . 1st place picks first, 2nd place pick second etc.. - 5 tokens focused on a creature of your choice (random tokens) - a rustgold - 2 wispoints (yes i am making an exception by giving 2 at one time, dont do the same ever) - a tainted angien, with some decent age (wtf is that?! O.o) - a b/w joker (the rare one not the shop one) - a tag and description, if you don't have one allready - 10 extra creature slots - a wind dragon, ONLY IF YOU OWN A DRACHORN (it will get mutated) - 3 custom items of your choice (not overpowered)

Its a lot game-related. All logan actions and amorans brought attention BECAUSE they were game related. It concernes the enitre MD and me personaly when the rumors they spread are paranoid and make people run away. THis issue had to be talked through and public to stop the nonsense that was going on behind the curtains, because that was realy affecting the game. The scandal caused is a small price to pay for clearing out the paranoid opinions that many were brainwashed into believing.

fine tuned theory: the avy that you buy and hold (no more) you can send to an other player that has the avy feature active and at least 2 credits (cost will be 2 credits for that player). In return you do not get those two credits so you will have to negociate a trading value for the avy. The 2 credits go to MD. In the case that this will build a market of avys and for example when i post 50 avys they vanish in the hands of traders, this will raise the value of avys and if they do not get sold they will be put at risk by the new avys next time i put an avy pack up. That way the avy price will be according to the market demand.

so what? thats the point of trade please note a character can hold only one avy at a time and the one that wants to get it must have the avy shop item activated

once you reach the avatar item in the shop, even if you payed a lot to get there, you can buy any avy for 1$ anytime and you can change it for as many times you want. It wont be fair to give each time more than 1$ because that will easily get abused and create a avatar shopping source of income. i think also the 100 days one plus the permanents that remain, but also tradeable avys could be an option because trade will allways adapt to the importance and real value of the avys. If the shop will have new avys for 1 $ the trade will stop, if the shop will have none, the trade will grow.

feel free to split this if its too offtopic what if the avys could be set up for auction once bought and the owner to get half of the sum. Still you can get multiple accounts to start auctions or if avys get taken by force once you exceed 100 consecutive inactive days..because currently there are over 400 avys and yet only a few get used actively. In this case what happens with characters that are legends in their own way and even if not active , they should not lose the avy. avys are worth far more than you pay for so if you are given less when putting them back up you wont do that but if you get more you will abuse it with multiple accounts or by repeating it. i don't have an issue with turning avys into tradable goods

Lets put it this way, i want quantity, because i know Glor will filter that quantity out and in the end we will have both! Glor, i KNOW you will get one of the rewards, its pointless to compete, lol, so consider you get a reward by default once you submit them, an additional one so the other competitors will still have theirs to fight for. DST, great idea, i was thinking yesterday about avatar transfering, but i will make it so that avatars get back into the shop in exchange of credits or something else back to a character of your choice. (open to suggestions)

- i refer to MD as a GAME because i used too from since i started it. Its ment in a warm and "mysterious" way, more like "the game", like you could call life a "game". I am not considering it just a game. I think i consider it anything but a game more than any of you. - Players come and go, i call it "player life", the reasons are countless, from personal to caused. I allways say this, everybody leaves eventualy, EVERYBODY, sadly... I am the only that stays, consider it a ballance - Regarding the cowardliness filter of "the game", think about the first days of a noob, getting smashed by all... I don't think cowards are allowed in unless they have a certain passion that ballances that cowardliness. Its not good like it is and even if i dont believe 90% are cowards at all, i hope people will take more action and stand for their ideas (not kill for them) but at the same time imagine a MD world full of ppl like akasha...i don't think you could stick 2 of them within 3 scenes distance or the lines of the scenes will start to melt just because they so wish to I am still analyzing if the demotion of Logan and Amoran is caused by my fault of judgement when i selected them or not. It might be than when i select a RPC i consider all features and problems alltogether and see if one of them stands out and i do not consider that one of the problems could cause bigger issues later than all the features combined. On the other hand, i have no way of knowing each one so good because a character is usualy mirroring a PART of his owner not the entire complexity behind it.

send as soon as you get at least ten, if you wait too much others may send first.

untill glor gets enough artworks to decide the winners.

it will be ..heretic ) check on my paper what heretic, the word, means. now seriously speaking, it will be like the writings of a mad man...you know i love that.

you are right, [b] i will consider a change of name. [/b] Anyway, i did conducted the "lecture" as a open discussion, so even if called lecture , it was a debate, but the wording matters. So far i considered lecture sounds way better than debate, probably because if i translate in my language the difference is not that obvious and i presumed allways a lecture is actualy a open debate , afterall nobody is telling you not to speak during it. The level of authority will self ballance based on how well the person speaking masters the subject and how many different opinion are among the audience.

nono, EACH page has sketches and graphical representations of the few words put in it, its well spiced to avoid boring reading

funniest thing is that i don't think the book will be much bigger than that, i am at page 30 and they are not word pages. Anyway after my agressive reaction against church and predefined concepts in general, i must say the book will have a VERY "heretic" presentation and i mean in the form it will be printed. I made it look like a manuscript with apparently random notes, without exceeding one or two pages per subject.... i want to focus attention on the personal nature of the writing and not hide behind the apparent authority and official character that the normal font of a book gives, its enough damage that people see my ideas as answers not as reasons to think more just because i have a huge authority in MD.

off topic reply: omg..i just read your decalogue carefully..... i felt like i hear the life philosophy of akasha , awsome, are just woman like that? I think a man would just have a monologue "My way or the highway" ) awsome anyway

12h ? hmm, i could do that actualy, but not if we speak about same thing all the discussion, i allready dream of circles and shperes funny thing is that if i start with most (maybe all) of the principles, i end up with a circle with one dot breach in it.... the dot is hounting me LOL. If i focus on the uses and representations or interactions about principles i could speak about more humanly subjects and not abstract theories. Or of course there are plenty of other subjects i could discuss about other than principles, even tehnical ones, i dont mind, as long as i know something enough to explain it, i can share my view with others ... I hope more will see this as an example and hold conferences of their own on subjects they master. "last man standing" lectures

you seek for truth? funny.... thats why you tlked things behind my back and refused to say "the truth" when i demanded so in public? My reputation is immune, my reputation is the game, if my reputation gets a certain 'color' the game will get that color too. Like your actions represent you , people judge you as a person YOU ARE, not as a general theoreticaly perfect person as you claim... the same way , i am judged by my work and action ... and so far you are here arguing because of me, in a world initiated by me, arguing against the very things you claim you fight for .. is that just wrong or what? All the peole in MD have their own ideas, MD is built from all sorts of beliefs and all sorts of people, they actively represent the "player base" of md. My ideas can;t be fitting all of their opinions and i do not aim to please anyone with what i think. My opinions and beliefs shape the game but in return players respond to it wich makes me learn something. For me MD is a "living" thing that helps me learn from you and you from me, consider it a ballance. And in case you do not know the meaning of the word LEARN, its not about convincing anyone that you are right, but to complete your ideas with the things missing or to give you clues to improve your theories and continue to evolve. You did not presented it to me as a conflict of ideas, i would have allways discussed that without any hate or bad reaction, ..what you did was to act cowardly in your own favor and to use the power of scandal and fantasy conspiracy theories to attract attention and to convince players of things you and logan imagined. YOU LIED that you have proof and opinions from former players that would support those theories, you lied about speaking with valy about it, you allways lied just to make your point and get people believe what you wanted ... and you speak to me about truth?

[quote]There were two reasons I did not speak in game. One is that Akasha continued to attack me in the chat. I would have spoken if she had, pardon my words, shut up- or if someone had shut her up via chat controls. But the simple fact is that she did not, therefore I did not speak in game. No player should ever be subjected to that kind of treatment- you had the power to silence her and you did not.[/quote] I could have shut you up too , but i didnt. Anyone can speak its mind freely, its up to the ones feeling attacked to react to it. Akasha felt MD was attacked and reacted placing herself in a fight that was hers too as a player of MD [quote]The second reason is simply because of the fact that I did not make such accusations against you and the accusations were said in a YIM chat, which is OOC and out of game entirely. The YIM conversation was NOT a trial against you or any other person, nor did I use my RPC position to manipulate any player into believing me[/quote] You contradict yourself, you say you did not make those accusations but you say there were in private. It doesnt realy matter if you do them in private if you talk to people from MD, people that know you from MD and people that know you as RPC, authority given by me, making your word count a lot more than normaly should. The conversation was not a trial but a brainwash, masterminded probably by logan and actively presented by you. You two ended up taking players one by one to convince them about paranoid stuff how MD is built by secret organisations and how i am some kind of freak erasing your minds. I dont realy care Logan was the mastermind behind this as i suspect,... a man is represented by the ideas he fights for, you fought for logans ideas so you payed for them. I never punished logan for his ideas because back when he was RPC i was not aware of such a thing happenig. Suddenly after he steped tottaly wrong and got demoted, he started to have paranoid beliefs and agitate people for nothing. What a coincidence. I don't care to punish logan, he is no longer rpc he has nothing to lose, anyone can speak freely, but you as a rpc, you have no more business in MD rpc group anymore and on top of that I will no longer let you or Logan scare players with fantasy paranoid stories based on imaginary proof just because they sound cool and because scandal is more interesting to others than truth.

Burns put it better than i could, its all about evolution, ancient lore kept people ignore the present and hide in the past, the present builds the future, the past is the foundation, but in this md world, the past was invented not experienced. Amoran was not demoted to "keep things going" however, but because i won't allow a purson in wich i put trust and authority over others to speak against the world she has to protect and help to grow. Its not about a difference of opinion, is about direct accusations. If she or logan said those things on private it has no importance because it was said to players and in a way targeted to believe that bullshit. And yes, MD is tottaly not at the end of the bag, the stuff i have on standby are at least that big as the entire current MD, probably more, and i will never stop as long as i can go on. ..but some things you are simply not ready for, i am talking for example about the sphere in the AL, the point where the story just stopped for a while..i will continue it when i feel its right. I have many creatures not used yet, but its not time for them because i want different abilities and i will not add them untill the current abilities are not fine tuned. The map is bigger too, and i am not only talking about the things only a few see, but about the things nobody ever saw *except who saw the artworks* I am working on a tottaly different concept of fightng system, factions is also one thing put on standby that when it will be up wil change quite much, and so on. MD has to have a ideology and at the same time respect all opinions, its a dificult task, but without it it will be chaos. Its a big big difference from judging someone for his OPINIONS and juding someone after he ATTACKS you or the things you care for. And on top of all, things are simpler that any explenation, i made you rpc, i demote you from rpc. period. You should be happy i am allways thinking things and dont react by first impulse...because if i did i would have cut this and other bullshit that happens in the realm directly just because i can without reasoning it.

This was a 9 hour lecture subjects range from entropy and syntropy, to religion, symbols, mathematics, infinity and zero, back to principles, secret of magic and human mind. If it goes to the archives, please remove the extra chats like usual and splitt it a bit with subtitles ..its way to long. Thank you all for participating, it was a great experience for me to learn from you by thrwoing my theories to your minds and seeing your arguments boths for and against. Remember i do this to learn not to tell you conclusions. I hope i left enough questions to keep your mind active and that my personal conclusions on the discussed matters only acted as a guide to make you think there is something outthere worthy of analising and not simply accepting or ignoring. Thank you

ah yes..same problem here...i allways tell Mur to behave himself but he allways goes back and complains to Mur that i am harrasing him

[quote name='stormrunner' post='33852' date='Jun 18 2009, 07:31 PM']mur your losing it [/quote] a dark face reveals itself from below Murs cloak, .... He allready lost me.... *diabolic laugh* Curtains close applause

*hears echo* "why why when i have so many things to doo..!!" *hears echo again* "you have a problem with it? Huh?" Omg, i am hearing voices. shutup...no you shutup..no you... *gets away from his mind for a bit* ...lets see, mental disease dictonary.....s....s...here it is...nope...i am not mad, pfeww ...great.......I AM NOT MAD I TELL YOU, shutup *who said that?* ...Mur is that you?...ah good...then it explains it all....i am not mad, just hearing Mur invisible voice.... Whats a mur? shutup i tell you Who me? Mur, thats no way to talk to Mur, signed Mur How many???