Chewett

When a multicast spell is used, it only uses 1 cast.

Is the bug repeatable? Is this still the case?

How spells fail are entirely undefined and normally based on when and who coded them. The later spells have decent error reporting. All spells need to be reviewed and have proper error reporting. Question to people: Should a spell fail if it is casted on multiple people, and one of them doesnt exist/it fails on. Or should it pass, and succeed on everyone that was valid and ignore those that are not?

Its broken, it doesnt get logged, needs to be fixed, its useful, needs to be documented

Two posts edited to remove murs swearing.

There are ways to stop you being teleported while offline, I dont like the concept when logged out you cannot be teleported. Teleporting in general, is badly looked on by both of us however.

>>>changelanguage (if you remember..) Wont be given due to technical problems with the item.

Dont forget the talking rock at GoE.

For those interested, the proper solution is: //Checks to make sure $data is an array before iterating if(is_array($data)) { foreach($data as $d) { //do somethign with $d } }

I dont know what "vault" you are talking about. I made treasuries a while ago, and was planning to role them out to lands after some changes have been made.

See I would have said those should be unique items and not common...

No, use new ideas.

Looks good.

Poked Mur.

Mur already has some plans about totems, fusing them.

No thats splitting resources which we have already discussed, repeatedly, that it wont be done. Please people stop suggesting this. Well done Syrian.

Looks like spam/random/misc to me.

Yes.

Its badly worded by Mur, It means unique as in, non common item, I believe. Common items are meant to be purely for use and combined into something else. Unique items are items that could have affects added to them, etc.

All common items will have the same image. If you wish to put forward an image for the black rose, we will consider it. Email it over. Common items shouldnt be able to have an image uploaded per item, avatar people please deny all images for common items until we remove the ability to add an image.

All items will be reviewed, spell checked, grammar checked and capitalised properly in the coming days. Items already given out will have descriptions and titles modified.

If there is anything you feel is unfinished, and feel it should be worked on, please state here. Learning from the last topic, do not just say "X needs work" state what and why you think it needs work. MD is constantly in flux, some of these "unfinished work" could be seen as new features/developments on features which is why you need to explain what and WHY. Trolling posts will be removed without warning.

Nothing is ever complete. Thats MD.

A25 features being implemented and used as a quest? Seems pretty game changing to me.

What do people see as "the point" for stages? To me, I dont see that they affect anyone really, they are a name to which we attach announcements. Its all well and good arguing whether we have moved to "the next stage" as a point of intellectual debate since we like arguments. But whats the point? Surely, if you want it as a "unit of advancement" then every announcement made, every ruling decided, and every offensive comment Dick Dastardly makes, is an advancement in MD?