(Zl-eye-f)-nea

[quote name='Udgard' timestamp='1294289185' post='76925'] The first one, I don't think will object much to the proposed requirements, [/quote] They already have, multiple times, both in this thread and others. [quote name='Udgard' timestamp='1294289185' post='76925'] And no, people are not supposed to wait for their angiens to have max age before going mp5.. [/quote] Of course people want to age their crits before levelling. If you were new now, I'm sure you would too. All this "supposed to" and "not supposed to" is making my head hurt. The newer players who do talk oppose what is being suggested for them and when they do they get told they are wrong...but its for them right? so....surely their statements are pretty important? Actually arn't their statements the most important? Or are we in Plato's republic? Look at HeHelpedMe here, getting negged for not understanding. Ridiculous. He is one of the only lower AD lower MP people giving comment. He should be listened to and discussed with. His opinion is more valuable because he is actually in the group that is supposedly trying to be helped. If you actually want to help, work with people like him, he is the target population supposedly being supported by this initiative and he opposes it. [quote name='Udgard' timestamp='1294289185' post='76925'] I think lately there has been to many illusions of "mp5s/vets only wanting to get more people to move up so they can pound them". The thing is, staying mp3/mp4 for eternity won't help people prepare to fight the "vets". People at mp5 has access to much faster stat growth than an mp3/4 can ever hope for, so the longer people stay there, the wider the gap between power they will have. And really, what can those so called vets do to pound on fresh mp5s that has actual consequence to those fresh ones? Combat losses are needed for balance, and tree rits easily prevent damage to your main army. [/quote] Having maxed creatures like angiens does help beat other players like MP5s who have maxed power creatures, so in that sense it does help. In addition the mp3/4s arn't all saying they are staying at lower levels in order to be capable of beating the MP5s. A number of them are saying they are staying there because there is just no point in going MP5 at all due to current MP5 attitudes and actions. These "illusions" you speak of are the voices of those that are supposedly trying to be aided. So listen and work with them. Even I think they are right, I've done testing on it and I have come to the conclusion that they are correct - but I'm not foolish enough to think that I really understand fully because no matter how much testing I do, I the player am a vet of the game and they are not. [quote name='No one' timestamp='1294322846' post='76964'] Should I remind you about MP4s with 10k attack ? PPL this is for your own good, for MD's future. [/quote] Is it? I really don't think it is. In the alternative version of this thread that Kafuuka made [url="http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/topic/8805-a-partial-solution-to-mp-levels-being-broken/page__p__76283#entry76283"]here[/url] I explained how by reasoning the only viable end result of this idea here is an attempt at re-populating MP5, it won't actually do anything else it claims to attempt as far as I can tell. [quote name='Kafuuka' timestamp='1294338639' post='76981'] I claim that nobody who has never had an mp5 account, supports this idea. [/quote] I'd agree, and I'd go further. Some people who have MP5 accounts also don't support it. Z

Happy Bifday Fenrir. Have a good one. Z

Happy bifday, fetch boy fetch! Z

1 rusty age 63 no tokens & 1 soulweaver age 14 no tokens Z

I find the image disturbing in that 'stare at me' kind of way. Its really good. Keep at it. Z

9 gold 30 silver (equivalent of 11 gold) Z

As much as the MP5s complain about the "abuse" of the lower MP levels, the lower MP levels are complaining about MP5 "abuse" of their over-powered accounts and further, their lack of general awareness and manners. They just arn't as loud about it because certain Mp5s keep telling them to shut up and deal with it. I have always found MP5 on the whole to be very "my drach is bigger then yours". Amazingly, MP5 then complain about people staying super powered at lower MP levels. Personally, I find the whole thing very ironic. If you make everyone MP5 or force MP5 upon people in order for them to be able to play properly, you don't actually change the issue causing upset. Over-powered accounts upsetting newer players still exists as a problem - and by restricting what they are left with when they have to go MP5 it is actually made worse not better. What you will have actually done is removed a way of abusing alts and increased the MP5 population. Removing the way of abusing alts is irrelivant because the purpose of doing it still exists even after you have done it unless you want to do it just for and of itself. That leaves increasing the MP5 population. Is that what this is about then? People will still be upset and either leave or kill off all their crits, that doesn't help anyone. Like kaf says, lets just make everyone MP5! That'll solve it! no wait...wait...no it won't. What we need, imo, is an attitude change. If you over-farm your land, it gets barren, you're guna have to bite the bullet and let it fallow. Z

Clearly, passing aged crits onto your low level alts is an abuse, you arn't supposed to trade crits between alts - there is even a built in function to stop it that you have to go around. Don't kid a kidder. If this is the problem then why isnt this being looked into instead of trying to change the entire system? Z

This is a short public statement and does not contain all facts and figures but only those pertinent to the resultant. In Brief: On the night of December 25th it was noted that the single Lumber resource at the path of Lonliness had been harvested. Necromancer Mortis, spokesperson for the woodcutters guild, was quick to offer his services to investigate the matter. The resultant was that they do not know what happened and that others have tools to harvest which are outside the guild. The woodcutters are the guild and only group that could be considered charged with governing wood collection and tree cutting within the realm and are therefore those to be held accountable for offering an explanation. In the absence of said explanation the Guardians of Bob have found: - No trade log record of anyone enacting this harvesting - A database management activity was in process at the time of the incident - The single lumber has regenerated despite a 50% regeneration rule. Resultant Due to the anomilous regeneration, the lack of log and the database update that was in progress, we believe that this situation was a glitch in the fabric of reality and not an attack on Bob the Tree. We appreciate the co-operation the woodcutters have shown in this matter. Unless further information comes to light, no further action will be taken on the matter. Z

I danced with a snowman in the mall because im cool like that

Thank you Mur. Happy Xmas, may the tomato be with you, always. Z

Well...thank you Mur for totally derailing the point of the thread Don't get me wrong, the haze is great...but...it isn't practical, and it's one thing to like to stream dream as I like to call it but it's quite another when you literally cannot open your eyes or walk. It's like being very very drunk in the middle of a snow storm in the dark with someone with a torch shining it directly into your face, that's how my mornings are...putting orange juice into cereal, seeing walls bend, washing your hands in after shave...yup... Technique for getting to sleep - do not go to bed with the intention of sleeping. Go to bed with the intention of inactively thinking. That is, you do not focus and pin things down, analyse and disect as one might usually when they think, but rather you literally allow your thoughts to come and go and you allow yourself to think about them inactively. You do not try to stop yourself thinking about anything. Thinking about what you are thinking, passing mental comment about how stupid the technique is etc, they are all allowed. Let it all happen. Make sure you breathe well. You will be doing the equivalent of allowing ripples in a pool to tire themselves out instead of splashing about and causing more. Eventually, if you practise this technique, you will achieve a state of half sleep and if you are lucky actual sleep. Main issue with this is if you conjure up things that are unpleasant...but that's a different matter entirely. Causing yourself not to sleep on the other hand -refusing to go to bed until you actually feel exhausted and the physical need to go to bed, can be another issue. I used to do sit ups for that one, but that doesn't work for most people. For most people it does the opposite. If you can reach a point where inactive thinking becomes an pleasurable actual activity for you, then that'll work because you will be 'doing' something. Z

If we are going too far from the point then someone can splice it. I think the topic slides into this anyway myself. Aysun - Your post is important because it is a viewpoint I have heard...quite possibly...more than any other viewpoint, in all of MD. It is important because it demonstrates the gap that causes frustration for a lot of people. Keep pushing for more automation and you are just pushing for walls to be built, walls you won't know will exist because you won't even consider there is something for a wall to be there for anymore. First - yes, someone has to hit the button, but do you really think whoever is charged with that would be a biased party to the degree you are suggesting? If someone really believes there is no hope, then they are right, for them there wont be any. Think about when things have happened in MD. Consider how and why they happened, what activated the moment of fully realised conception? Try to put aside what you hear, or what you think you know, and just think about that, think about what you see not what you hear, not assumptions, not links, literally what you witnessed. I'll give you an example, how did we get Bob healed recently? Someone might have said, oh, it's Z, so he must have organised it with a higher power. Yet that is an assumption, and I will tell you now, it's wrong. So consider what actually happened. Build your winning potion from elements of success. Have some keys I've handed out before at various times that keep getting burried, a secret hidden in audible noise if you like. If it were me leading the rebellion, I would not be doing things behind curtains and in the shadows. I might do that for a while, but it would be for a very specific purpose that would lead to... A rebellion is a side of a see-saw, you need to tip the balance in your favour. The only way to do this is with weight. What adds weight and how would you achieve that in an obvious and visible way? How would you build enough energy to cause an explosion? It isn't about one man running into a field and knocking down a castle, nor is it about five men doing it, you need an army to do that for it to have any impact. It also isn't about seemingly cleverly concocted plans with devious storylines. You don't actually need to know the percentages and the ratios if you understand what I've been saying properly. It isn't easy either, because you need to have a constant. Remember, a rebellion is another word for war, and keep in mind to consider all people, this is a small world, any corner of it is everyone's corner. This will probably just fall on deaf ears again, or be used for a moment, maligned and tossed in the bin, but I say it for that tiny tiny cricket that listens and realises something they once knew and maybe didn't even know they knew, then somehow forgot. As my Dad says, go move the world. Z

You shouldn't be relying on anyone else anyway, there is no "must" rely on. There are lots of things the rebels can do if they want to, but they dont. For a rebellion, its incredibly quiet and well behaved. It is the least rebellious rebellion I have ever seen. You don't actually need anyone to do something special in order to advance the cause, because if you as rebels do what you should be doing to fulfil the title of rebel then things will happen as a result of that anyway. If rebels feel stifled from a lack of activity, it is their own - and you might want to have a think about what human element might mean, because it doesn't mean what you are talking about there. [quote name='Aysun' timestamp='1292516647' post='75581'] it is only stifled by lack of ability to properly act due to reliance on unreliable elements.[/quote] What or who are you accusing of being an unreliable element? Unless a King already knew who people's alts were, and unless once the rebels tip enough to call an election an instant alt check is done on all rebels, then a King is left trying to play detective. So this isn't a totally unfounded thread despite how some people want to portray it. Z

I had that log in screen appear for me too. I just clicked the login to existing account link and logged in, not a problem. I rather like the design all told. Z

[img]http://i415.photobucket.com/albums/pp238/zleiphneir/squshrp.jpg[/img]

Muchos happy bifdayos mistah Blackwood (Brick 42 says Hi) Z

Happy Bifday, Slainte Z

[img]http://i415.photobucket.com/albums/pp238/zleiphneir/stage31.jpg[/img]

[img]http://i415.photobucket.com/albums/pp238/zleiphneir/squarect.jpg[/img] Cancel

[img]http://i415.photobucket.com/albums/pp238/zleiphneir/mursymbol1.jpg[/img]

This idea has come up, it appears, as an opposite to balance Tranquility days. On a roleplay level, T-days are the mechanical function of night which is the opposition to standard fighting days which are the mechanical function of Day. Kafuuka has already said this. On a more base level, non T-days are not the opposite to T-days due to the percentages involved. On a heads day anyone can be attacked in a sanctuary once they have 7+ heads, what is the opposite to this? there isn't one. On standard days you can fight everywhere except a few locations and there are far more standard days than sanctuary days. A more accurate opposite would be to have few locations you could fight as opposed to none - but that isn't the argment or request here. This seems far more an excuse for vet MP5s who want to grind than anything else. Z

Thank you Phantasm...for your fantastic contribution to the discussion You can chair a board, I can stone you, but stone and chair are not verbs in and of themselves. The verb part doesn't even come from these words themselves linguistically. If a single word cannot be used to communicate a universal meaning then a conglomerate of single words can't either, it just makes the situation worse instead of better. The fact that despite the amount of words I used to explain the words I was using still ended with two people commenting on verbs should at least [u]partially[/u] demonstrate that. Things can indeed be defined by language but not to an extent which is totally devoid of interpretation. Language itself is an experience for one thing. How can you say the earth is and has always been spherical when we know this from scientific methods which are based on experience which we have agreed (as far as I can tell, I could be wrong?) is a flawed method? Years ago you would have ended that sentance with the word flat. The scientific method being fallible cannot necessarily be counted as evidence against objective reality, but in the same vein it also cannot be counted as evidence for it. Our experience may indeed have no bearing on something's objectivity, but then how to know it is objective? There is a 'something' that causes an experience. A majority of people call this experience Red. Despite any divergance from this majority experience, the something remains as it is. You can see it as Red, I can see it as Green, but it is as it is regardless - I take this as your argument. Agree or disagree with that point, it is a different debate though, not one about language. What is language based on is a subject I touched on in the first post I made here - it's an important one. Z

Here is [url="http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/topic/4659-the-alliance-list/"]Awiiya's alliance list[/url] for you No they don't all have the same benefits. Z

Science changes all the time, assuming it is correct just ignores where it comes from. Scientific measurements come from our physical experiences, we make machines that measure in a certain way, built in a certain way to achieve a certain result. Science, along with your argument, depends on the majority rules dictum - which is hardly evidence of objectivity. I don't really know what you are talking about when you say 'pure abstracts' - something that has absolutely no link or pointer to or in the physical world in any way what-so-ever? I never mentionned anything like that. If you are talking about the flaw in the tautological statement, that all language is based on experience anyway, then this falls into the Green or Red area again and I refer you to the above. I never said you couldn't define things using language, I said you can't do it in a way that is totally devoid of interpretation. No meaning is universally accepted, as I explained to you about the Chair. If definition is in question and your answer is to use language to solve this, you fall again into tautology and endless regress. The point that you sat on something is irrelivant here, I am talking about one single word - Chair, not a sentance. Chair isn't the verb to sit nor does this word hold a verb in it. Maybe it is better I pick a word for you that has no obvious attached function instead. A stone. If I say stone, and I do not point you to any particular stone, then to what do I refer? Is it some conglomerate of stone experiences? What is stoneness? Z