Jubaris

I agree that certain moral standards should be applied, like you say Sharazhad, but there are few "variables"... Mur is doing it for his personal benefit? What kind of benefit? Cognition? Isn't it the same benefit as the student that researches human behavior you mentioned? Bottom line is, this is Mur's game, and he made it clear on various occasions and on the very site that this is an unconventional "game". He is not making the game to make YOU relaxed, and wherever you go, you will be someone's "pawn" in one way or another. When clicking a youtube video, you are someone's "pawn" in achieving higher views number, for example... It's a relative subject. The problem is when you damage people in a way, then you need to explore the whole situation. Ok, you list psychological experience issues in MD - what, this game has potential to make conflicts between people?! That is what every community has in itself. This is a game that is supposed to bring experience to people (and experience of those people to the game, meaning Mur). Conflicts are IMPORTANT part of experience. If Mur encouraged certain conflict-making, then it is his decision to do so - it is your decision to accept it or not, to conclude is this the last line that couldn't be crossed or not quite yet? There is a certain inconvenience when you take Mur's decision to high standard and get offended when he thinks differently than you. He is not perfect nor best of us all, and this was supposed to be a community of intellectual independent people, that know how to avoid identity "mass-production" that is so frequent in reality, yet there are many people here, experienced too, that take Mur's words for granted and use it as some kind of axiom, and eventually get shocked that one of those is contradicting to their own logic - then mental chaos emerges! x)

[url="http://magicduel.com/"]http://magicduel.com/[/url] "[color=#ff0000]Regester[/color] now and get..."

A bit of classic hits: [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLZMMk8KZSU&feature"]http://www.youtube.c...Mk8KZSU[/url] (Uriah Heep - July Morning) And a bit of domestic acoustic power... Ave Serbia & Macedonia [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyFwwIHw6nw&feature"]http://www.youtube.c...wIHw6nw[/url] (Miroslav Tadic & Vlatko Stefanovski - Jovano Jovanke)

114) MD is actually a project made by Area 51. Mur is from Texas.

If he does not have to, does not mean he should not Neno Veliki is a respected member of the community, a very nice guy, dedicated, has a line of achievements for the cause of Magic Duel. He got jailed controversially for an act that is debatebly used by the very accusser. I think he deserves to be released as soon as his sentence runs out (which already did).

I can edit it now, but I got "edit all clickables" ability in the meantime so... Obviously, it isn't in Grade 4, even tho in the name of the clickie it should be so.

Well, Ghost/Cloak spells already do the Sanctuary, basically. But some abilities or locations that prevent skill damage would be cool.

I'm ok with the concept that you can use land loyalty to decrease viscosity even if you aren't citizen of that land (but you were before), but, the problem is that those that are very loyal to their homelands and don't want to temporary join other ones to gain some traveling advantages suffer. Perhaps there should be some bonuses for "very loyal" people. Some kind of proportional increase of stats in fights when they fight in their homelands?

I do that Tal, but still, when you have some 40 rituals to unbind...

30 silver for 51 memory stones

51 memory stones -> 1 gold coin.

Yeah, sorry for this derail of the topic Just wanted to add an additional "easy" option on COTS's offtopic suggestion.

Also, mark rituals so I can delete several at once, rather then one - refresh - one - refresh - one... etc.

All of the works are really great, I'm very happy that I've made it in the circle of awards. I enjoy these dream-based quests, it is a good flavor for our experience in MD I'm looking forward for the next one!

Yes Maeb, but I'm talking about the ability to make someone a citizen without inviting him or her to an alliance. I've noticed several people with Necrovion citizenship around, who could have only gotten it after Jester's "downfall". I'm concerned mostly about this because our land, Marind Bell, gets its people mostly on the level of citizenship, while the alliances are the next advanced steps.

But recruiting new citizens is ok? It doesn't fit in reward/punish sections.

Nutcracker alone - 3 gc

ID: 408848 Drachorn 16 GC and a Santa age 728

Amoran is from Loreroot, Udgard, you can't nominate her.

If Maebius can't get it, then I request the code, so you don't get in double standards troubles (I'll just forward it to him)

Samon and Guillak - I am in love with your works! Here's mine simple version: [img]http://www.dodaj.rs/f/2m/q9/4JmPQ9v3/winds-sanctuary-challeng.png[/img]

I have the same issue as Maebius when I tried to check multiple clickables - but, it works when I click on the name of one clickable in the list.

I know, thus my pointing out of the ridiculous and incomplete rule

My bad, then, Brulant. I was sure I saw Necrovion citizen tag on him long time ago...

I believe Dragual Monarth and Brulant are of Necrovion? I'm sure Azull is. [quote] Outstanding service to MD *[b]Brulant[/b] (+[b]Dragual Monarth[/b]) Golden protector *[b]Azull[/b] (+Sasha Lilias, [b]Dragual Monarth[/b], Maebius) [/quote] You should have asked people to tell their citizenship before nominating people, and probably telling citizenship of the nominated person. Also, do the rules allow for one of the people to drop citizenship of a land, just to be able to be nominated by his "previous" fellow citizens? Because there are several examples of land changing, even jailtime (nadrolski, tho he might have been released, I don't remember), which makes them eligible for nominations. For example, Jester was the king of Necrovion, up till recent. Some people have influence in certain lands like they are their citizens (Pipstickz with Necro and Tribunal), because they actually were before. The rule is so made in rush, and it sucks, plainly. It has major flaws, doesn't take a lot of things in consideration.