So do i. Which is why i'm so curious.
About this...here's what i did. First, i read entire texts. Then, i mingled phrases (because after a while i saw that i memorized the text and it wasnt 'reading anymore'), cutting the logic of sentences. Finally, i mingled words.
Based on that, i can say that memory is very important in this process. It all starts when you learn thw letters, of course, and the visual side matters a lot. Afterwards, memory still affects the way you read texts, so much that in order to break down the complex patterns forming in my mind, i had to simplify to the extreme. Only this way you can have a fresh look at a text everytime you read something. Why a fresh look? Because you might want to replace the way memory works by destroying memorised patterns.
What i did was simply read aloud texts in various languages, and tried to read without 'thinking'. And it's difficult identifying letters, stacked consonants and the way to pronounce them, also because in a word of, say, 5 syllables, due to double consonants, you have awkward breaks and many sounds. All in all, a syllabary serms to be harder at first and infinitely easier later, the opposite being said about alphabets. So is thrre an advantage of the alphabet that coyld compensate for its difficulty?
Maybe i'll learn hiragana, to check it out.