dst

Reminder for next year: New rule about nominating alts to same or different category.

How do you plan on dividing players based on combat knowledge?

If you'd know them then you'd be able to create alts to get the presents you'd like.

Make the submissions public.

Happy New Year from Romania as well!

For some of the above: It's not about anyone having the wish from the wish shop. It's about being able to actually DO stuff with the clickes. More than just to put a password and show a text. She didn't ask for players with the wish bought but for players that know what an array is.

http://www.random.org/

Hmm....I don't have a paypal account and I don't want to make one right now (LOTS of reasons why) so do you have an account I can transfer some money to from my own bank account? And of course, would you accept such a payment method?

Also, there is a timeline that will show you how the pad evolved. Save often so nobody will be able to delete it.

Psst. There is an option to restore the text. I just used it. It restored a 2 days ago text.

No idea. Soon.

After applying all the rules stated in the first post, the situation is the below one: So we have 3 categories with more nominees that allowed. I don't know if we'll remove one from each or we'll let them compete. Also, there are other 2 categories with only 2 players nominated. Since neither me or Grido nominated anyone we might use this to complete the missing categories. LE: added Chew to Top Techie cause I missed his nomination. If I missed anyone else, please let me know. If you have suggestions, please share. LLE: Added No one for adventuring. Rophs nominated him but I thought he meant nobody :D. I got tricked by my own...name :D

dst

Nimmy, I celebrate Christmas but I don't have half of those :D. Nor do I think I will get many of them...

1) I don't play a role. I am not a character. I don't rp and I hate rp-ers and rp-ing most of the time. I have A JOB. 2) I cannot care less of what you think of me (that I did bad or good or that I am rude or whatever). I only care when you accuse me of things I haven't done. And if you don't bring evidences (this is for you po! :D) then you're defo on my black list. 3) I don't expect rewards from anyone and especially not from you. I have achieved almost everything I wanted in MD. I am not looking for "spiritual rewards". I don't look for fame (although it came to me by itself). The only thing that is rewarding to me in MD at this point is information. And you Ack* have none to provide. Except the occasional trolling (see this whole thread). For some personal reasons I kept posting in this thread and I might post some more but to be honest this is just me killing time: you'll not understand anything from what I am and what I am saying and what I do and I will probably not bother carefully reading your post because they are chaotic (I cannot find a better word). As you see, I only answer few things: the ones I understand from your posts. And I think this thread is not the first time I say it. There are other few players which had (or have) a similar way of writing. Guess what? I never read them and sometimes that worked in their disadvantage. Oh well...tough luck.

I have been doing it for years because I am playing for years. Also, before Council there was only Mur to go to and you know how he is. So for me the only way of acting was to make that info public. And it works. Every time a thing goes public, it is solved one way or the other. So why should I stop using the method that actually produces results?

In 90% of the abuses/wrong stuff cases, I go directly to council. That is why you don't know for example that I reported Menhir for alts abuse. Or some other players for the same thing. Or rumi and darkraptor (mostly rumi - darkraptor was quite a collateral). Some were dealt with, some not. I didn't quite pursue the ones that didn't because they were at their first offense. But with others like fang, fenrir, phantom orchid, NO. They have been accusing me of all sorts of things IN PUBLIC. So I reply with in the same way. Eye for an eye. Then there is the "what did they do?" factor you or mallos raised at the beginning of this topic. mallos knows most of the stuff because they are buddies in crime but since few things are public he just plays the innocent card. So no, I will not hide the garbage under the carpet anymore. When it comes to certain players OR certain kinds of abuses (like cybering for example) expect to see things on forum.

You mean this? What do you mean by "minimize size of a council of punishment"? How do I choose SOME people to fully inform? What do you mean by "Have some people fully informed, and some people together capable of rebalancing the situation"? I don't understand the sentence if I add the second part. What do you mean by " Minimize the latter part"? What resources are you talking about? Define excess punishment. As I've said before: I DON'T understand your post at all. Enlighten me.

And I harm players because what?

I love how you think that I don't influence features anymore :D. Ignorant, that's what you are. Btw: I tried reading your post but except the part where you say that what I did in the past doesn't matter, I have absolutely no clue what you are saying. The ideas are so vague and the references to points are hard to follow that I give up and I will not read it a second time.

Who are you dd to tell me not to post on the forum? And who are you to tell me I am rude? Since when are you qualified to decide who is or isn't rude? Who are you to tell me what to do and how to do it?

Same as the stuff you did. No! EVERYTHING should be on the forum. We should have a transparent system and not me reporting all bad stuff to council and then you (general you) complaining that one person got jailed, banned, punished. There are TONS of stuff players did but none of them reached the public ears and people go by the idea that those person are nice and kind and bla bla.

I didn't say point 2 is fair or valid. Innocence has a forum account which he uses to troll and neg rep people and we all know that account. Him denying it has no effect in my eyes. Anyways, I think it's enough offtopic. If you deem necessary please split/delete/move/hide the "offtopic".

1) He doesn't want to be part of it: http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/topic/13331-md-awards-2012-nominations/ 2) I don't want such a person to be part of it.

I've seen many of you nominated innocence for RP. I am sorry to say but he will NOT be taken into account for the votes. Not this year not never as long as I am organizing this (and even beyond if I will be able to). So if you want to nominate someone else, please do so.