Chewett

Example report: I clicked on the top bar link <link here> I entered "useful reports are useful" and pressed enter The below printscreen shows its broken <broken image> I expected it to "show me kitties"

Apologies, I have been away helping an international competition today and yesterday and only just got back.

Please. when reporting bugs, do not just give me a screenshot and let me guess how you reached it, but detail it too. This helps massively as it gives me something specific to try rather than randomly trying to break it myself.

As a note, I still havent seen any steps to reproduce this bug :( I could probably reproduce it, but if you do report a bug, you already know the steps to do it so...

The order chosen isnt defined in the query, but since its indexed in ascending id, it means that for now it will select the lowest ID I believe And yes, you do need a grasan.

Something you might have forgotten, I was the one who provided the extensive list of ID's to playernames and helped you with that script. When I was later a coder I liked the idea so I implemented. It wasnt leaked :P

To focus on the positive points of the post, how do people think the interface could change. The optimial width of MD is planned to change to 1280. This fits the majority of screen sizes and this should be taken into account. If this discussion gets interesting I might leak the prototypes :D

As a note, you can call it what you like but it is still not allowed. You are modifying the behavior of MD to allow you to do things faster. This is an unfair advantage and who knows where you stop. Would you say that "Oh writing a bot to trade lots of items is fine because its just using MD", or what about a bot to attack again "im just using MD". I personally have wasted a lot of time where people have installed such scripts and forgotten or didnt know what they did and either they broke them, or the scripts were badly written and broke their MD. Although interestingly the new interface will have a large amount of customisation since we plan "slots" of information to move around the page. We know a number of people use scripts to gain an unfair advantage and some even brag about it and this isnt really fair. If script use becomes widespread we will have to just ban those using or making them because it is unfair.

ok then.

Rophs?

This will be worked on when I have finished the chat testing scripts.

Was fixed :)

Marked as not a bug for now, Its a wider issue and need a rewrite of the regen tick system (If you arnt around lots of things dont happen).

was fixed

Mur has said he has planned "some" way of replacing the things lost in story mode. However I dont know what that is. I shall contact him but he isnt working on MD atm as he is busy doing other things.

Potentially, I only mention it since I believe Grido gave his view on a number of things we discussed previously. Grido never found a solution he was happy me implementing as an improvement

There was another thread where grido replied to a number of these points giving his views.

Its interesting to see that many would become MP6 if they could freely, for whatever reason. I will ponder. Further feedback is welcome.

MP5 is also a requirement to MP7, Does this confuse the model more! Im not aware thats ever been said. When the creature requirements were created and some creatures were MP6 early mur planned many people to only visit MP6 for a period of time to max out their creatures. That everyone would eventually visit it. This turned out too annoying for the protectors as they all just kept falling as the next fighter wanted to max his crits, so I removed the MP6 requirement after talking with Mur.

But its not? The "final" stage is MP5. MP6 is a stage for protectors and MP7 is illusions. End game is MP5 where your character becomes an "adult"

If you are able to, and not restricted by needing to gather X adepts, would you become a MP6 and why. If you havent been a MP6 before, please state why not.

I didnt see that quote, but still stand by what I said, and that it is unfair if you are going to judge it purely on how people percieved the post. Also, as a note, If I missed it, did others? you dont know.

To be entirely fair Rheaggy, You only asked for votes you didnt ask for votes and reasons. So you couldnt possible award it on the basis of some people giving more than you asked. If you think that the reasons also matter, you should ask all players to vote and give one or two reasons then it will be fair. Otherwise you are awarding something based on mere understanding of what you wanted which doesnt seem very fair at all.

Question: is not asking peoples personal views and beliefs, itself a little... invasive? I wouldnt publicly post my religious beliefs, etc, on MD or anywhere on the internet and surely thats going to be the main reasoning for why someone would or wouldnt find it offensive?

Indeed Happy Birthday conc