Kaya

If I remember right the rules changed a while back and now you're no longer allowed to exchange coins and other items between accounts under any circumstances. Even when you buy them from the shop you buy them for that account, otherwise using alts you can gain as many coins as you have money for.

Happy Birthday Ledah!

I seem to be unable to connect to browsermmorpg.net

[quote name='Chewett' timestamp='1329429978' post='104479'] You make the, possibly incorrect, [i]assumption[/i] that they feel that he should be sacrificed since they "dont like him". If you consider that they tried to help and they died as well, Then it might not nesscarily be because they "dont like him" or he was rude to them.[/quote] My surprize wasn't as much for weather people like him or not, but moreso for the fact that people seem to be willing to sacrifice him at all. This seems, in my eyes, to be contradicting the reason for this topic and looks disrespectful to the other dead as well. They died trying to save Seigheart, so wouldn't sacrificing him make their deaths in vain? Also the apparent favor for such a solution makes it look like we've given up on fighting death already and now try to make the best of it by limiting our losses. (I'm not saying you did give up, this just that this makes me wonder how many people really want to fight death, and how many only want their friends back.) I could have missed something and this is all regardless of whether it's possible or not, but to me this is a bit shocking actually.

Good luck trying to resurrect them. Sadly from my current position I won't be able to help much. P.s. Anyone noticed how the proposal to sacrifice Seigheart to save the others gained +12 rep O.o I knew Seigheart wasn't loved by everyone, but a bit of consideration for the dead wouldn't have hurt.

I shouldn't have stepped out, I seem to have more than enough time, and I leash would have made things so much easier...

One thing I've been thinking about for a while is that coins in real live have one important use, except for their monetary value. Among other things many games and important decisions are decided by flipping coins. Therefore I think it would be nice to turn coins into usable items that would give either heads or tails in a similar way to how dices work.

I'm afraid I'll have to step out of the auction. I'm quite sure I won't be able to make it, and I'm also probably unable to fullfill my role as slave after that.

The first thing you do when you get at school is checking the "You know you've been on MD to much when..." topic. You start to speak OOC talk between brackets, on a game without RP.

The GoE if I'm right, but no one is there yet.

Shouldn't it be up to the buyer how long they want to keep their slave? I'm willing to stay a slave until I get abandoned by my master, or I get abused so badly that I see no other way to survive in this world than to try to run away. Also are we alowed to start making bids already?

An important cause of these errors is combining qoutes and stars while drunk. this should cause errors for everyone untill someone clears the chat.

This should help: http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/topic/6903-how-to-export-transparent-gif-avy/

I don't know how to use MD Script yet, but I do know a bit of HTML and plan on learning it once I have some more free time.

I'll volunteer, for the greater good. I'll do whatever you want, cook, clean, help you train, anything you want. I also have grade 4 clicky access if you need it.

On the other hand, do you think people would care for whether there enemy wants you in there land or not, other than the risk of getting killed? You can't really have a good war without the possibility of invasions. I do think there should be some penalty for walking in enemy territory though, like an AP cost bonus and a stat penalty. Perhaps even skill damage? The real locking out should be done by the players self in my opinion, that's what the land cleansers are for.

Hi Ocule Welcome to the realm and welcome to the forums, good luck on your adventures!

What you're saying, Kamisha, sounds pretty much like Torch Competition, only players that pick up a torch participate, and the prize goes to each land. One thing I thought is that it might be interesting when the land recognizes citizens of opposing lands as enemies, and makes it harder for them to walk through their territory, as opposing to land loyalty bonus.

I noticed the Tribunal gate (7_gate_1) isn't on the list. It can be depleted to 13/19 for full regen, or 11/19 for max regen. (6 herbs per day)

Inspired by Hedge I tried playing a bit with the triangle and the spiral, and here it is: [attachment=3622:Necro CoA.jpg] I pointed the triangle downwards as a reverence to both the elements earth and water and the darker down side. The white circle is the border between inner and outer Necrovion The spiral continues outside the triangle and outside the black circle like Necrovions influence reaches outside Necrovion. Also inspired by the tear shape Idea I made it into the shape of a tear: [attachment=3623:Necro CoA 0.2.jpg] This does greatly alter it's symbolic meaning, but can easily be combined with a mask to get a greater symbol. I think they would make s nice coat of arms when combined with a mask. Also the first time I tried to save it it ended up like this: [attachment=3624:Necro CoA.png] Not sure what it means, I thought it does look kind of interesting though.

Ann. 2071 - [2011-11-10 04:52:36 - Stage 11] Trading shared items interface restrictions Shared items can no longer be transfered if the target player already holds two or more other shared items. In some situations you might require having multiple shared items , such as the cauldrons for example. Remember the cauldrons are designed for collaborative play and not single-player activity. There is still a way to hold multiple items, so you can enjoy collecting more types of resources for example. All you need to do is go and grab them yourself! Its only the transfer that is restricted by the interface not also the grabbing of items directly from the item dispatcher. You can get more than 3 items by grabbing them yourself, you only can't get more items when someone else gives them to you.

That would mean changing the entire start of thee story mode and tutorial, because right now you need your creatures before you enter story mode. Chances of mur changing this are nearly zero. Placing something like this before story mode is a bit less impossible, but still highly unlikely. Also if this one way or another does get implanted I think it shouldn't be random. Barren Souls and the likes aren't really abusable any way.

I gathered a few screenshots of (near) depletion and abusive harvesting. Uploaded them to photobucket because there are to many to put them in one post. They are at [url="http://www.photobucket.com/mddepletion"]http://www.photobucket.com/mddepletion[/url]. At the moment I have (between brackets is the amount of screenshots I have and of what resource): Boterham (2 Herbs) Child of the Soul (1 Herbs, 1 Lumber) He did apologize though DST (1 Herbs) Eon (3 Water, 6 Herbs) might have some duplicates with previous posts No one (2 Herbs) Passant the Weak (1 herbs) Zyrxae (1 Herbs) may be more deeper in the Tribunal, didn't have AP and time to look This is what I found the past week. I'm actually a bit surprised about how much I found especially because I didn't search for depletion every day.

The GoE still belongs to no land and gives the loyalty bonus: [b]Territory: [/b] [b]Coord:[/b] 1_0x0_1 [b]Tags: [/b] none Same for the other locations. Also Old man's road (1_1x-4_1) doesn't give the no man's land loyalty bonus for me.

There is one thing that Eon most probably does using alts that is against the rules though. And that is saving a (or probably multiple) wishpoint or/and a lot of silver by using alts to find out players locations and therefore save Locate spells. Seeing one of Eon's alts and shortly thereafter seeing Eon is a strong indicator that Eon might be using her Alts for this, and if seen repeatedly could be used as prove to accuse Eon of a crime at least as bad as Neno's. Also there should be no need for screenshots when there are multiple reliable eyewitness accounts. As Xrieg says for some people it's almost easier to alter a screenshot than to make a good fake testimony.